Towards model-driven provisioning, deployment, monitoring, and adaptation of multi-cloud systems

IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, CLOUD

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 887-894

  Ferry, Nicolas ^a   Rossini, Alessandro ^a   Chauvel, Franck ^a   Morin, Brice ^a   Solberg, Arnor ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

adaptation; cloud computing; CloudML; deployment; domainspecific modelling language; model driven engineering; models@run time; monitoring; multi cloud; provisioning

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY; MODELING LANGUAGES;

ADAPTATION; CLOUD-COMPUTING; CLOUDML; DEPLOYMENT; DOMAIN-SPECIFIC MODELLING LANGUAGES; MODEL-DRIVEN ENGINEERING; MODEL@RUN-TIME; MULTI-CLOUDS; PROVISIONING; RUNTIMES;

CLOUD COMPUTING;

EID: 85184840384     PISSN: 21596182     EISSN: 21596190     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CLOUD.2013.133     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. P. Mell and T. Grance, “The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Special Publication 800-145, September 2001.
2. E. Brandtzæg, M. Parastoo, and S. Mosser, “Towards a Domain-Specific Language to Deploy Applications in the Clouds,” in CLOUD COMPUTING 2012: 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing, GRIDs, and Virtualization. IARIA, 2012, pp. 213–218.
3. D. Ardagna, E. Di Nitto, G. Casale, D. Pectu, P. Mohagheghi, S. Mosser, P. Matthews, A. Gericke, C. Balligny, F. D’Andria, C.-S. Nechifor, and C. Sheridan, “MODACLOUDS, A Model-Driven Approach for the Design and Execution of Applications on Multiple Clouds,” in ICSE MiSE: International Workshop on Modelling in Software Engineering. IEEE/ACM, 2012, pp. 50–56.
4. R. Prodan and S. Ostermann, “A survey and taxonomy of infrastructure as a service and web hosting cloud providers,” in GRID 2009: 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing. IEEE, 2009, pp. 17–25.
5. A. Li, X. Yang, S. Kandula, and M. Zhang, “CloudCmp: comparing public cloud providers,” in IMC 2010: 10th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, M. Allman, Ed. ACM, 2010, pp. 1–14.
6. W. Jansen, “Cloud Hooks: Security and Privacy Issues in Cloud Computing,” in HICSS 2011: 44th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. IEEE Computer Society, 2011, pp. 1–10.
7. “CloudSleuth.” [Online]. Available: https://cloudsleuth.net/
8. “Amazon Web Services.” [Online]. Available: http://aws.amazon.com/
9. “OpenStack.” [Online]. Available: http://www.openstack.org/
10. “vCloud.” [Online]. Available: http://vcloud.vmware.com/
11. “CloudStack.” [Online]. Available: http://incubator.apache.org/cloudstack/
12. “Eucalyptus.” [Online]. Available: http://www.eucalyptus.com/
13. “OpenNebula.” [Online]. Available: http://opennebula.org/
14. “jclouds.” [Online]. Available: http://www.jclouds.org/
15. “Deltacloud.” [Online]. Available: http://deltacloud.apache.org/
16. “Simple Cloud.” [Online]. Available: http://simplecloud.org/
17. “fog.” [Online]. Available: http://fog.io/
18. “Libcloud.” [Online]. Available: http://libcloud.apache.org/
19. “The blurring line between PaaS and IaaS.” [Online]. Available: http://natishalom.typepad.com/nati_shaloms_blog/2012/10/paas-as-an-infrastructure.html
20. “OpenShift.” [Online]. Available: https://openshift.redhat.com/app/
21. “Chef.” [Online]. Available: http://www.opscode.com/chef/
22. “Puppet.” [Online]. Available: https://puppetlabs.com/
23. “4CaaST EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://4caast.morfeo-project.org/
24. “ARTIST EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.artist-project.eu/
25. “CELAR EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.celarcloud.eu/
26. “Cloud4SOA EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cloud4soa.eu/
27. N. Loutas, V. Peristeras, T. Bouras, E. Kamateri, D. Zeginis, and K. A. Tarabanis, “Towards a Reference Architecture for Semantically Interoperable Clouds,” in Cloud Com 2010: 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, 2010, pp. 143–150.
28. “CloudScale EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cloudscale-project.eu/
29. “Contrail EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://contrail-project.eu/
30. E. Carlini, M. Coppola, P. Dazzi, L. Ricci, and G. Righetti, “Cloud Federations in Contrail,” in Euro-Par Workshops, 2011, pp. 159–168.
31. “CumuloNimbo EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.cumulonimbo.eu/
32. “MODAClouds EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.modaclouds.eu/
33. “mOSAIC EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.mosaic-project.eu/
34. C. Sandru, D. Petcu, and V. I. Munteanu, “Building an Open-Source Platform-as-a-Service with Intelligent Management of Multiple Cloud Resources,” in UCC 2012: 5th IEEE International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, 2012, pp. 333–338.
35. “Optimis EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.optimis-project.eu/
36. A. J. Ferrer, F. Hernández, J. Tordsson, E. Elmroth, A. Ali-Eldin, C. Zsigri, R. Sirvent, J. Guitart, R. M. Badia, K. Djemame, W. Ziegler, T. Dimitrakos, S. K. Nair, G. Kousiouris, K. Konstanteli, T. A. Varvarigou, B. Hudzia, A. Kipp, S. Wesner, M. Corrales, N. Forgó, T. Sharif, and C. Sheridan, “OPTIMIS: A holistic approach to cloud service provisioning,” Future Generation Comp. Syst., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 66–77, 2012.
37. “PaaSage EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.paasage.eu/
38. “REMICS EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://remics.eu/
39. “Reservoir EU project.” [Online]. Available: http://www.reservoir-fp7.eu/
40. L. Rodero-Merino, L. M. V. Gonzalez, V. Gil, F. Galán, J. Fontán, R. S. Montero, and I. M. Llorente, “From infrastructure delivery to service management in clouds,” Future Generation Comp. Syst., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1226–1240, 2010.
41. J. Kephar and D. Chess, “The vision of autonomic computing,” Computer, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 41–50, January 2003.
42. G. Blair, N. Bencomo, and R. France, “Models@run.time,” IEEE Computer, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 22–27, 2009.
43. B. Morin, O. Barais, J.-M. Jézéquel, F. Fleurey, and A. Solberg, “Models@run.time to support dynamic adaptation,” IEEE Computer, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 44–51, 2009.
44. “OMG Model-Driven Architecture.” [Online]. Available: http://www.omg.org/mda/
45. C. Atkinson and T. Kühne, “Rearchitecting the UML infrastructure,” ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 290–321, 2002.
46. F. Fouquet, E. Daubert, N. Plouzeau, O. Barais, J. Bourcier, and J.-M. Jézéquel, “Dissemination of Reconfiguration Policies on Mesh Networks,” in DAIS 2012: 12th IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference on Distributed Applications and Interoperable Systems, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, K. M. Göschka and S. Haridi, Eds., vol. 7272. Springer, 2012, pp. 16–30.
47. J.-Y. Tigli, S. Lavirotte, G. Rey, V. Hourdin, N. Ferry, C. Vergoni, and M. Riveill, “Low response time context awareness through extensible parameter adaptation with ORCA,” Annales des Télécommunications, vol. 67, no. 7-8, pp. 313–327, 2012.