First Amendment Limitations on Trademark Rights

Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age: Volume 1: Copyright and Related Rights

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 147-174

  Ramsey, Lisa P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85184095014     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Alex Kozinski & Stuart Banner, Who’s Afraid of Commercial Speech?, 76 Va. L. Rev. 627, 651-53 (1990);
2. Robert C. Denicola, Trademarks as Speech: Constitutional Implications of the Emerging Rationales for the Protection of Trade Symbols, 1982 Wis. L. Rev. 158, 190 n.146;
3. David McGowan, Some Realism About the Free-Speech Critique of Copyright, 74 Fordham L. Rev. 435, 441-49 (2005)
4. Mark A. Lemley&Eugene Volokh, Freedom of Speech and Injunctions in Intellectual Property Cases, 48 Duke L.J. 147, 185 n.179 (1998)
5. Erwin Chemerinsky, Balancing Copyright Protections and Freedom of Speech: Why the Copyright Extension Act Is Unconstitutional, 36 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 83, 93-94 (2002)
6. David McGowan, Why the First Amendment Cannot Dictate Copyright Policy, 65 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 281, 294-96 (2004);
7. Neil Weinstock Netanel, Locating Copyright Within the First Amendment Skein, 54 Stan. L. Rev. 1, 47-54 (2001)
8. Keith Aoki, How the World Dreams Itself to Be American: Reflections on the Relationship Between the Expanding Scope of Trademark Protection and Free Speech Norms, 17 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 523, 538-43 (1997);
9. Rochelle Cooper Dreyfuss, Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation, 65 Notre Dame L. Rev. 397, 412 (1990);
10. Robert N. Kravitz, Trademarks, Speech, and the Gay Olympics Case, 69 B.U. L. Rev. 131, 146 (1989);
11. Robert J. Shaughnessy, Note, Trademark Parody: A Fair Use and First Amendment Analysis, 72 Va. L. Rev. 1079, 1111-12 (1986);
12. Eugene Volokh, Freedom of Speech and Intellectual Property:Some Thoughts After Eldred, 44 Liquormart, and Bartnicki, 40 Hous. L. Rev. 697, 711-12 (2003).
13. C. Edwin Baker, First Amendment Limits on Copyright, 55 Vand. L. Rev. 891, 922-33 (2002)
14. Pierre N. Leval, Trademark: Champion of Free Speech, 27 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts 187, 191-92 (2004);
15. Lisa P. Ramsey, Descriptive Trademarks and the First Amendment, 70 Tenn. L. Rev. 1095, 1113-15 (2003)
16. Lisa P. Ramsey, Intellectual Property Rights in Advertising, 12 Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 189 (2006).
17. Margreth Barrett, Internet Trademark Suits and the Demise of “Trademark Use,” 39 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 371, 393, 417-18 (2006);
18. Stacey L. Dogan & Mark A. Lemley, Trademarks and Consumer Search Costs on the Internet, 41 Hous. L. Rev. 777, 791-99 (2004);
19. Mark A. Lemley, Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding, 83 Tex. L. Rev. 1031, 1033-69 (2005);
20. Glynn S. Lunney, Trademark Monopolies, 48 Emory L. J. 367, 455-61 (1999).
21. David J. Franklyn, Debunking Dilution Doctrine: Toward a Coherent Theory of the Anti-Free-Rider Principle in American Trademark Law, 56 Hastings. L.J. 117, 138-45 (2004)
22. Kevin J. Greene, Abusive Trademark Litigation and the Incredible Shrinking Confusion Doctrine-Trademark Abuse in the Context of Entertainment Media and Cyberspace, 27 Harv. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 609, 614 (2005);
23. Alex Kozinski, Trademarks Unplugged, 68 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 960, 972-73 (1993);
24. Malla Pollack, Your Image Is My Image: When Advertising Dedicates Trademarks to the Public Domain-With an Example from the Trademark Counterfeiting Act of 1984, 14 Cardozo L. Rev. 1392, 1397-1446 (1993).
25. Jennifer E. Rothman, Initial Interest Confusion: Standing at the Crossroads of Trademark Law, 27 Cardozo L. Rev. 105, 150-59 (2005).
26. Uli Widmaier, Use, Liability, and the Structure of Trademark Law, 33 Hofstra L. Rev. 603, 620-24, 647 (2004).
27. Mark A. Lemley, The Modern Lanham Act and the Death of Common Sense, 108 Yale L. J. 1687, 1710-12 (1999).
28. HannibalTravis, The Battle for Mindshare: The Emerging Consensus That the First Amendment Protects Corporate Criticism and Parody on the Internet, 10 Va. J.L. Tech. 3 (2005), http://www.vjolt.net/vol10/issue1/v10i1 a3-Travis.pdf.
29. Pratheepan Gulasekaram, Policing the Border Between Trademarks and Free Speech: Protecting Unauthorized Trademark Use in Expressive Works, 80 Wash. L. Rev. 887, 922-31 (2005)
30. Bruce P. Keller & Rebecca Tushnet, Even More Parodic Than the Real Thing: Parody Lawsuits Revisited, 94 Trademark Rep. 979, 1006-07 (2004).
31. Nike, Inc. v. Just Did It Enters., 6 F.3d 1225, 1228 (7th Cir. 1993)