PRO-LIFE IS ANTI-LIFE: THE PROBLEMATIC CLAIMS OF PRO-LIFE POSITIONS IN ETHICS

Value Inquiry Book Series

Volumn 144, Issue , 2003, Pages 99-109

  Harris, John ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85180801688     PISSN: 09298436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789401200967_014     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. David Oderberg, Moral Theory (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000).
2. Euthanasia Examined: Ethical Clinical and Legal Perspectives, ed. John Keown (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).
3. See John Harris, "Conjoined Twin Non-Persons," Medical Law Review 9:3 (2000), pp. 221-236.
4. See John Harris, Violence and Responsibility (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1980);
5. John Harris, The Value ofLife: An Introduction to Medical Ethics (London: Routledge, 1985).
6. Laurence H. Tribe, Abortion, The Clash ofAbsolutes (New York and London: W. W. Norton and Company, 1990), p. 140.
7. See H. L. A. Hart, "Intention and Punishment," in his PunishmentandResponsibility (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968).
8. Julian Savulescu has argued something like this in a personal communication.
9. See Oderberg, Moral Theory, p. 147.
10. See Harris, Violence andResponsibility.