PARITY OF REASONING" ARGUMENTS IN BIOETHICS-SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

Value Inquiry Book Series

Volumn 144, Issue , 2003, Pages 47-56

  Holm, Soren ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85180784016     PISSN: 09298436     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789401200967_009     Document Type: Chapter

References (10)

1. Matti Hayry, Playing God-Essays on Bioethics (Helsinki: Helsinki University Press, 2001), p. 70.
2. Tom Beauchamp and James Childress, Principles ofBiomedicalEthics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th ed., 2001), pp. 8-9.
3. James Rachels, "Active and Passive Euthanasia," AppliedEthics, ed. Peter Singer (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 32.
4. David Oderberg, Moral Theory"-{l Non-Consequentialist Approach (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2000).
5. J. J. Thomson, Rights, Restitution, andRisk(Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1986);
6. F. M. Kamm, "The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End," Proceedings o fthe Aristotelian Society, supp. 74 (London: The Aristotelian Society, 2000), pp. 21-39;
7. John Harris, "The Moral Difference Between Throwing a Trolley at a Person and Throwing a Person at a Trolley," Proceedings ofthe Aristotelian Society supp. 71 (London: The Aristotelian Society, 2000), pp. 40-57.
8. Kamm, "The Doctrine of TripJe Effect"; Timothy Williamson, Vagueness (London: Routledge, 1994);
9. Vagueness; A Reader, ed. R. Keefe and P. Smith (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1997).
10. R. P. Churchill, Becoming Logical-An Introduction to Logic (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1986). p. 58.