Governance and Administration: Organizational and Structural Trends

Springer International Handbooks of Education

Volumn 18, Issue , 2007, Pages 141-157

  Sporn, Barbara ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Entrepreneurial Activity; High Education; High Education Policy; Institutional Leader; Public Management

Indexed keywords

EID: 85179364873     PISSN: 21971951     EISSN: 2197196X     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4012-2_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (65)

1. Altbach, P. G. (2004). Globalization and the university: Myths and realities in an unequal world. Tertiary Education and Management, 10(1), 3–25. [Note: An updated version of this essay appears in this Handbook.]
2. Askling, B. (2001). In search of new models of institutional governance: Some Swedish experiences. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 163–180.
3. Askling, B., Bauer, M., & Marton, S. (1999). Swedish universities towards self-regulation: A new look at institutional autonomy. Tertiary Education And Management, 5(2), 175–195.
4. Baldridge, J. V., Curtis, D. V., Ecker, G. P., & Riley, G.L. (1977). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In G. L. Riley & J. V. Baldridge (Eds.), Governing academic organizations (pp. 2–25). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
5. Bauer, M., Askling, B., Gerard-Marton, S., & Marton, F. (1999). Transforming universities: Changing patterns of governance, structure and learning in Swedish higher education (Vol. 48). London: Jessica Kingsley.
6. Birnbaum, R (2000) Management fads in higher education: Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. Chichester: John Wiley.
7. Bleiklie, I., Hostaker, R., & Vabo, A. (2000). Policy and practice in higher education: Reforming Norwegian universities (Vol. 49). London: Jessica Kingsley.
8. Cave, M., Hanney, S., Henkel, M., & Kogan, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement (3rd ed.). London: Jessica Kingsley.
9. Chevaillier, T. (2002). Higher education and its clients: Institutional responses to changes in demand and in environment. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 303–308.
10. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
11. Clark, B. R. (2003). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Tertiary Education and Management, 9(2), 99–116.
12. Cohen, M. D. & March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president (2nd ed.). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
13. De Boer, H. (2001). On limitations and consequences of change: Dutch university governance in transition. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 163–180.
14. Dill, D. D. (1993). Quality by design: Toward a framework for quality management in higher education. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 8, pp. 37–83). New York: Agathon.
15. Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: The organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher Education, 29(4), 369–384.
16. Dill, D. D. (1997a). Effects of competition on diverse institutional contexts. In M. W. Peterson, D. D. Dill, & L. A. Mets (Eds.), Planning and management for a changing environment: A handbook on redesigning postsecondary institutions (pp. 88–105). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Dill, D. D. (1997b). Higher education markets and public policy. Higher Education Policy, 10(3/4), 167–186.
18. Dill, D. D. (1998). Evaluating the “evaluative state”: Implications for research in higher education. European Journal of Education, 33(3), 361–377.
19. Dill, D. D. (1999). Academic accountability and university adaptation: The architecture of an academic learning organization. Higher Education, 38, 127–154.
20. Dill, D. D. & Sporn, B. (1995). The implications of a postindustrial environment for the university: An introduction. In D. D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Pergamon.
21. Dill, D. D., Massy, W. F., & Cook, C. M. (1996). Accreditation and academic quality assurance: Can we get there from here? Change, 28, 16–24.
22. Eckel, P. D. (2000). The role of shared governance in institutional hard decisions: Enabler or antagonist? Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 15–39.
23. Etzkowitz, H. & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Introduction: Universities in the global knowledge economy. In H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy (pp. 1–8). London: Pinter.
24. Ferlie, E., Ashburner, L., Fitzgerald, L., & Pettigrew, A. (1996). The new public management inaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
26. Green, K. C., & Gilbert, S. W. (1995). Great expectations: Content, communications, productivity, and the role of information technology in higher education. Change March/April, p. 8–18.
27. Gumport, P. J. (2000). Academic restructuring: Organizational change and institutional imperatives. Higher Education, 39(1), 67–91.
28. Gumport, P. J., & Pusser, B. (1999). University restructuring: The role of economic and political contexts. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research. New York: Agathon.
29. Gumport, P. J., & Snydman, S. K. (2002). The formal organization of knowledge: An analysis of academic structure. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 375–408.
30. Gumport, P. J., & Sporn, B. (1999). Institutional adaptation: Demands for management reform and university administration. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 14, pp. 103–145). New York: Agathon.
31. Harman, G. (1999). Australian science and technology academics and university-industry research links. Higher Education, 38(1), 83–103.
32. Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education (Vol. 46). London: Jessica Kingsley.
33. Jeliazkova, M., & Westerheijden, D. F. (2002). Systemic adaptation to a changing environment: Towards a next generation of quality assurance models. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 433–448.
34. Kezar, A. J., & Eckel, P. D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: Universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? The Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.
35. Kogan, M. (1999). Academic and administrative interface. In M. Henkel & B. Little (Eds.), Changing relationships between higher education and the state (pp. 263–279). London: Jessica Kingsley.
36. Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education (Vol. 50). London: Jessica Kingsley.
37. Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (2000). Transforming higher education: A comparative study (Vol. 57). London: Jessica Kingsley.
38. Maassen, P. A. M., Goedegebuure, L. C. J., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1993). Social and political conditions for the emerging tertiary structures in The Netherlands. In C. Gellert (Ed.), Higher education in Europe (pp. 135–151). London: Jessica Kingsley.
39. Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise university: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Morgan, A. W. (2000). Importing organizational reform: The case of lay boards in Hungary. Higher Education, 40(4), 423–448.
41. Muller-Boling, D. (1998). University governance as conflictual management. In D. Muller-Boling, E. Mayer, A. J. MacLachlan, & J. Fedrowitz (Eds.), University in transition. Research mission— interdisciplinarity—governance (pp. 231–245). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.
42. OECD. (1998). Redefining tertiary education. Paris: OCED.
43. Rhoades, G. (1996). Reorganizing the faculty workers for flexibility. Journal of Higher Education, 67(6), 626–659.
44. Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany: State University of New York Press.
45. Rhoades, G. (2000). Who’s doing it right? Strategic activity in public research universities. Review of Higher Education, 24(1), 41–66.
46. Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002a). New models of management and shifting modes and costs of production: Europe and the United States. Tertiary Education and Management, 8(1), 3–28.
47. Rhoades, G., & Sporn, B. (2002b). Quality assurance in Europe and the U.S.: Professional and political economic framing of higher education policy. Higher Education, 43(3), 355–390.
48. Rothblatt, S., & Wittrock, B. (Eds.). (1993). The European and American university since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
50. Shattock, M. (2000). Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutional self reliance. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(2), 93–104.
51. Shattock, M. (2003). Managing successful universities. London: Open University Press.
52. Slaughter, S. (1998). National higher education policies in a global economy. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization (pp. 45–70). London: Sage.
53. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
54. Sporn, B. (1996). Managing university culture: An analysis of the relationship between institutional culture and management approaches. Higher Education, 32, 41–61.
55. Sporn, B. (1999). Adaptive university structures: An analysis of adaptation to socioeconomic environments of U.S. and European universities. London: Jessica Kingsley.
56. Sporn, B. (2001). Building adaptive universities: Emerging organizational forms based on experiences of European and U.S. universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121–134.
57. Sporn, B. (2003). Trends relating to higher education in Europe: An overview. In H. Eggins (Ed.), Globalization and reform in higher education (pp. 117–130). Berkshire: Open University Press.
58. Stensaker, B. (2001). Innovation and isomorphism: A case study of university identity struggle 1969–1999. Higher Education, 42(4), 473–492.
59. Tierney, W. G. (Ed.). (1998). The responsive university: Restructuring for high performance. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
60. Trow, M. (1998). Governance in the University of California: The transformation of politics into administration. In D. Muller-Böling, E. Mayer, A. J. MacLachlan, & J. Fedrowitz (Eds.), University in Transition (pp. 265–286). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.
61. vanVught, F. (1995). The new context for academic quality. In D. D. Dill & B. Sporn (Eds.), Emerging patterns of social demand and university reform: Through a glass darkly (pp. 194–211). Oxford: Pergamon.
62. vanVught, F. (1999). Innovative universities. Tertiary Education and Management, 5(4), 347–355.
63. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.
64. Weiler, H. N. (1998). Different ways of decision making in higher education and higher education policy in Germany and the United States. In D. Müller-Böling, E. Mayer, A. J. MacLachlan, & J. Fedrowitz (Eds.), University in transition (pp. 287–293). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Foundation.
65. Yorke, M. (2000). Developing a quality culture in higher education. Tertiary Education and Management, 6(1), 19–36.