Therapeutic sperm cryopreservation

Clinical Andrology: EAU/ESAU Course Guidelines

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 124-133

  Tomlinson, Mathew ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85178211417     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Aust TR, Brookes S, Troup SA, et al. Development and in vitro testing of a new method of urine preparation for retrograde ejaculation; the Liverpool solution. Fertil Steril 2007; 89:885-891.
2. Polge C, Smith A, Parkes A. Revival of spermatozoa after vitrification and dehydration at low temperatures. Nature 1949; 164:666.
3. Sherman JK. Synopsis of the use of frozen human sperm since 1964: state of art of human spermbanking. Fertil Steri 1973; 24:397-412.
4. Nijs M, Ombelet W. Cryopreservation of human sperm. Hum Fertil 2001; 4:158-163.
5. Tomlinson MJ, Pacey AA. Practical aspects of sperm banking for cancer. Hum Fertil 2003; 6:100-105.
6. Oehninger S, Kemal Duru N, Srisombut C, et al. Assessment of sperm cryodamage and strategies to improve outcome. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 169:3-10.
7. Horne G, Atkinson AD, Pease EH, et al. Live birth with spermcryopreserved for 21 years prior to cancer treatment: case report. Hum Reprod 2004; 19:1448-1449.
8. Critser JK, Arneson BW, Aaker DV, et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa II Postthaw chronology of motility and of zona-free hamster ova penetration. Fertil Steril 1987; 47:980-984.
9. Henry MA, Noiles EE, Gao D, et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa IV. The effects of cooling rate and warming rate on themaintenance of motility, plasmamembrane integrity, and mitochondrial function. Fertil Steril 1993; 5:911-917.
10. Gao DY, Liu J, Liu C, et al. Prevention of osmotic injury to human spermatozoa during addition and removal of glycerol. Hum Reprod 1995; 10:1109-1122.
11. Devireddy RD, Swanlund DJ, Roberts KP, et al. The effect of extracellular ice and cryoprotective agents on the water permeability parameters of human sperm plasma membrane during freezing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1125-1135.
12. Mahadevan M, Trounson AO. Relationship of fine structure of sperm head to fertility of frozen human semen. Fertil Steril 1984; 41:287-293.
13. Alvarez JG, Storey B. Evidence for increased lipid peroxidative damage and loss of superoxide dismutase activity as a mode of sublethal cryodamage to human sperm during cryopreservation. J Androl 1992; 13:232-241.
14. James PS, Wolfe CA, Mackie A, et al. Lipid dynamics on the plasma membrane of fresh and cryopreserved human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1827-1832.
15. Medeiros CMO, Forell F, Oliveir ATD, et al. Current status of spermcryopreservation: why isn't it better? Theriogenology 2002; 57:327-344.
16. Crister JK, Huse-Benda AR, Aaker DV, et al. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa III. The effect of cryoprotectants on motility. Fertil Steril 1988; 50:314-320.
17. Mc Laughin EA, Ford WC, Hull MG. The contribution of the toxicity of glycerol-egg yolk citrate cryopreservative to the decline in human sperm motility during cryopreservation. J Reprod Fertil 1992; 95:749-754.
18. Giraud MN, Motta C, Boucher D, et al. Membrane fluidity predicts the outcome of cryopreservation of human spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2160-2164.
19. World Health Organization (WHO). Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
20. World Health Organization (WHO). Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
21. Tomlinson MJ, Kessopoulou E, Barratt CLR. The diagnostic and prognostic value of traditional semen parameters. J Androl 1999; 20:588-593.
22. Björndahl L, Tomlinson MJ, Barratt CLR. Raising standards in semen analysis: professional and personal responsibility. J Androl 2004; 25:156-157.
23. Tedder RS, Zuckerman MA, Goldstone AH, et al. Hepatitis B transmission from contaminated cryopreservation tank. Lancet 1995; 346:137-139.
24. Fountain D, Ralston M, Higgins N, et al. Liquid nitrogen freezers: a potential source of microbial contamination of hematopoietic stem cell components. Transfusion 1997; 37:585-591.
25. Sakkas D, Manicardi GC, Tomlinson M, et al. The use of two density gradient centrifugation techniques and the swimup method to separate spermatozoa with chromatin and nuclear DNAanomalies. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1112-1116.
26. Tomlinson MJ, Moffatt O, Manicardi G, et al. Interrelationships between seminal parameters and sperm nuclear DNA damage before and after density gradient centrifugation: implications for assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2001; 10:2160-2165.
27. Sharma RK, Agarwal A. Influence of artificial stimulation on unprocessed and Percoll-washed cryopreserved sperm. Arch Androl 1997; 38:173-179.
28. Esteves SC, Sharma RK, Thomas AJ, et al. Improvement in motion characteristics and acrosome status in cryopreserved human spermatozoa by swim-up processing before freezing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:2173-2179.
29. Mack SR, Zaneveld LJD. Acrosomal enzymes and ultrastructure of unfrozen and cryotreated human spermatozoa. Gamete Research 1987; 18:375-383.
30. Mortimer D. Symposium: cryopreservation and assisted human conception Current and future concepts and practices in human sperm cryobanking. RBM online 2004; 9:2.
31. Bergeron A, Manjunath P. New insights towards understanding the mechanisms of sperm protection by egg yolk and milk. Mol Reprod Dev 2006; 73:1338-1344.
32. Royere D, Barthelemy C, Hamamah S, et al. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa: a 1996 review. Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2(6):553-559.
33. Watson PF. The preservation of semen in mammals. In: Finn CA, ed. The Oxford Reviews of Reproductive Biology. Vol 1. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1979:283-350.
34. Clarke GN, Liu DY, Baker HW. Improved sperm cryopreservation using cold cryoprotectant. Reprod Fertil Dev 2004; 15:377-381.
35. Tomlinson MJ, Morroll D. Risks associated with cryopreservation: a survey of assisted conception units in the UK and Ireland. Hum Fertil 2008; 11:33-42.
36. Clarke GN. Sperm cryopreservation: is there a significant risk of cross-contamination? Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2941-2943.
37. Ragni G, Caccamo AM, Dalla Serra A, et al. Computerized slow-stage freezing of semen from men with testicular tumours or Hodgkin's disease preserves sperm better than standard vapour freezing. Fertil Steril 1990; 53:1072-1075.
38. Mc Laughin EA, Ford WC, Hull MG. A comparison of the freezing of human semen in the uncirculated vapour above liquid nitrogen and in a commercial semi-programmable freezer. Hum Reprod 1990; 5:724-728.
39. Paras L, Freisinger J, Esterbauer B, et al. Cryopreservation technique: comparison of test yolk buffer versus Sperm-Cryo and vapour versus computerised freezing. Andrologia 2007; 40:18-22.
40. Duru NK, Morshedi MS, Schuffner A, et al. Cryopreservation-thawing of fractionated human spermatozoa is associated with membrane phosphatidylserine externalization and not DNAfragmentation. JAndrol 2001; 22:646-651.
41. Donnelly ET, Mc Clure N, Lewis SEM. Cryopreservation of human semen and prepared sperm: effects on motility parameters and DNA integrity. Fertil Steril 2001; 76:892-900.
42. Ackerman DR. Damage to human spermatozoa during storage at warming temperatures. Int J Fertil 1968; 13:220-225.
43. Behrman S, Ackerman DR. Freeze preservation of human sperm. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1969; 103:654-664.
44. Tomlinson MJ. Opinion: managing risk associated with cryopreservation. Hum Reprod 2005; 20:1751-1756.