The German Constitutional Court says lila zu Deutschland!

German Law Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1241-1257

  Halberstam, Daniel ^a   Mollers, Christoph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85178186550     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20718322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S2071832200001577     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. European Parliament. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
2. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 413, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
3. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 400, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html(emphasis added).
4. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 327, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
5. CARL SCHMITT, DIEGEISTESGESCHICHTLICHE LAGE DES HEUTIGEN PARLAMENTARISMUS (1923).
6. See Daniel Halberstam, The Bride of Messina: Constitutionalism and Democracyin Europe, 30 EUR. L. REV. 775 (2005).
7. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 286, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
8. GERHARD LEHMBRUCH, PARTEIENWETTBEWERB 1M BUNDESSTAAT (3d ed. 2000);
9. Fritz Scharpf The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessonsfrom German Federalism and European Integration, 66 PUB. ADMIN. 239 (1988).
10. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 287, available at: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
11. See CHRISTOPH MOLLERS, STAAT ALS ARGUMENT 146 n.67 (2000).
12. CHRISTOPH MOLLERS, DER VERMISSTE LEVIATHAN 44-47 (2008).
13. HANS PETER BULL, DIESTAATSAUFGABEN NACH DEM GRUNDGESETZ (2d ed. 1977).
14. National League of Cities v. Usery, 426 U.S. 833 (1976);
15. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority, 469 U.S. 528 (1985);
16. New York v. United States 505 U.S. 144 (1992);
17. Printz v. United States 521 U.S. 898 (1997);
18. United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995).
19. Daniel Halberstam, Comparative Federalism and the Issue of Commandeering, in THE FEDERAL VISION 213 (Kalypso Nicola"ldis & Robert Howse eds., 2001).
20. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 252, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
21. HAROLD J. LASKI, STUDIES IN THE PROBLEM OFSOVEREIGNTY (1924).
22. STEVEN D. KRASNER, SOVEREIGNTY: ORGANIZED HYPOCRISY 79-80 (1999).
23. GREGORY BATESON, STEPS TOAN ECOLOGY OFMIND 159-338 (1999).
24. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2 BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 216, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
25. See, e.g., Heribert Prantl, Verfassungsgericht zu Lissabon-Vertrag - Europeiscne Sternstunde, SUDDEUTSCHE ZEITUNG, July 1, 2009.
26. Robert D. Putnam, Diplomacyand Domestic Politics:The Logic of Two-Level Games, 42 INT'L ORG. 427 (1988).
27. WALTER BAGEHOT, THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION 69 (1967).
28. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 409, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.
29. Treaty Establishing the European Community, Dec.24, 2002, art. 213(1)(3), 2002O.J.(C325)33, 120 [hereinafter ECTreaty];
30. Lisbon Case, BVerfG, 2BvE/08 from 30 June 2009, para. 229, availableat: http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208.html.