Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: Theoretical and methodological considerations 1

Costerus New Series

Volumn 141, Issue , 2002, Pages 410-437

  Cowie, Claire ^a   Dalton Puffer, Christiane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85176789409     PISSN: 01659618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004489349_017     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Adams, Valerie. 1973. An introduction to modern English word-formation. London: Longman.
2. Algeo, John. 1998. Vocabulary. In The Cambridge history ofthe English language, 4: 1776-1997, ed. by S. Romaine. Cambridge: CUP
3. Anshen, Frank, and Mark Aronoff. 1989. Morphological productivity, word-frequency and the OED. In Language change and variation, ed. by R. Fasold and D. Schiffrin. 197-202. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins..
4. Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Wordformation andgenerative grammar. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
5. Aronoff, Mark. 1980. The relevance of productivity in a synchronic theory of word formation. In Historical Morphology, ed. by J. Fisiak. 71-83. The Hague: Mouton.
6. Aronoff, Mark, and Frank Anshen. 1998. Morphology and the lexicon: Lexicalization and productivity. In The handbookofmorphology, ed. by A. Spencer and A. M. Zwicky. 237-248. Oxford: Blackwell.
7. Baayen, Harald. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of morphology I99I, ed. by G. Booij and J. van Marie. 109-149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
8. Baayen, Harald. 1993. On frequency, transparency and productivity. In Yearbook ofMorphology 1992, ed. by G. Booij and J. van Marie. 181-208. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Baayen, Harald, and A. Renouf. 1996. Chronicling The Times: Productive lexical innovations in an English newspaper. Language 72.1: 69-96.
10. Baayen, Harald, and Rochelle Lieber. 1991. Froductivity and English derivation: A corpus-based study. Linguistics 29: 801-843.
11. Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bauer, Laurie. 1988. Introducing linguistic morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
13. Booij, Geerd. 1977. Dutch morphology. A study ofwordformation in generative grammar. Lisse: de Ridder.
14. Burnley, Richard. 1992. Lexis and semantics. In The Cambridge History ofthe English Language 2: 1066-1476, ed. by N. Blake. 409-499. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Chitashvili, Revas, and Harald R. Baayen. 1993. Word frequency distributions. In Quantitative text analysis, ed. by L. Hrebicek and G. Altmann. 54-235. Trier: WVT.
16. Cowie, Claire. 1999. Diachronic word-formation: A corpus-based study of derived nominalizations in the history ofEnglish. Cambridge University: Ph.D. Thesis..
17. Cowie, Claire. Forthcoming. The discourse motivations of neologising: Action nominalization in the history of English. In Lexicology, Semantics and Lexicography in English Historical Linguistics: Papers from the Fourth G.L. Brook Symposium, ed. by J. Coleman and Ch. Kay. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
18. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1994. Productive or not productive? The Romance element in Middle English derivation. In English Historical Linguistics 1992, ed. by F. Fernandez, M. Fuster and J. J. Calvo. 247-260. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
19. Dalton-Puffer, Christiane 1996. The French influence on Middle English morphology: A corpus-based study ofderivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
20. Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Maria Ladanyi. 1998. On grammatical productivity of word formation rules. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 62163: 29B55.
21. Dressler, Wolfgang U., and Maria Ladanyi. 1999. Productivity in word formation (WF): A morphological approach. Acta Linguistica Hungarica.
22. Fisiak, Jacek (ed.) 1985. Historical Semantics, Historical Word Formation. Berlin: Mouton.
23. Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. Mayerthaler, Willi 1981. Morphologische Naturlichkeit. Wiesbaden: Athenaion.
25. Neuhaus, Joachim. 1971. Beschrankungen in der Grammatik der Wortableitungen im Englischen. Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrlicken: Ph.D. Thesis.
26. Nevalainen, Terttu. 2000. Lexis and Semantics. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 3: Early Modern English 1476-1776, ed. by R. Lass. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Plag, logo, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, and Harald Baayen. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3: 209-228.
28. Plag, logo. 1999. Morphological productivity. Structural constraints in English derivation. (Topics in English Linguistics 28) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
29. Romaine, Suzanne. 1983. On the productivity of word-formation rules and limits of variability in the lexicon. Australian Journal ofLinguistics 3: 177-200.
30. Romaine, Suzanne. 1985. Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In Papersfrom the Sixth international Conference ofHistorical Linguistics, ed. by J. Fisiak. 451-465. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
31. Schafer, Jtirgen. (1989). Early Modem English: OED, New OED, EMED. In Dictionaries of English, Prospectsfor the RecordofOur Language, ed. by R. W. Bailey. 66-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.