Change To Social Justice Education: Higher Education Strategy

Social Justice Education: Inviting Faculty to Transform their Institutions

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 70-84

  Clair, Karen L St ^a   Groccia, James E ^b  

^a Emerson College s Center for Innovation in Teaching and Learning   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85173369810     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003447009-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Advancing a tradition of social justice (n.d.). Diversity Digest. Retrieved July 2008, from http://www.diversityweb.org/Digest/F96/haverford.html
2. Bell, L. A. (2007). Theoretical foundations for social justice education. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice (2nd ed., pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
3. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Civian, J. T., Arnold, G., Gamson, Z. F., Kanter, S., & London, H. B. (1997). Implementing change. In J. G. Gaff & J. L. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 647-660). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Clark, B. R. (2007). A note on pursuing things that work. In P. J. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 319-324). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
6. Dunkin, M. J., & Biddle, B. J. (1974). The study of teaching. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
7. Fletcher, J. J., & Patrick, S. K. (1998). Not just workshops anymore: The role of faculty development in reframing academic priorities. International Journal for Academic Development, 1(1), 39-46.
8. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Groccia, J. E. (2007, Winter). Planning faculty development activities: Using a holistic teaching and learning model. POD Network News, pp. 1, 3.
10. Jackson, B. W., & Holvino, E. (1986, October). Working with multicultural organizations: Matching theory and practice. Paper presented at the Organizational Development Network Conference, New York.
11. Kezar, A. J. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 28, No. 4). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Kuh, G. D. (1996). Guiding principles for creating seamless learning environments for undergraduates. Journal of College Student Development, 57(2), 135-148.
13. Lindquist, J. (1997). Strategies for change. In J. G. Gaff & J. L. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 633-646). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Marchesani, L. S., & Adams, M. (1992). Dynamics of diversity in the teaching-learning process: A faculty development model for analysis and action. In M. Adams (Ed.), Promoting diversity in college classrooms: Innovative responses for the curriculum, faculty, and institutions. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 52 (pp. 9-20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Professional and Organizational Development in Higher Education Network (POD), (n.d.). What is faculty development. Retrieved July 17, 2008, from http://www.podnetwork.org/development/definitions.htm
16. Roper, L. D. (2007). Creating, sustaining, and transforming difference, power, and discrimination programs. In J. Xing, J. Li, L. Roper, & S. Shaw (Eds.), Teaching for change: The difference, power, and discrimination model (pp. 227-234). Lan-ham, MD: Lexington Books.
17. Scott, G. (1999). Change matters: Making a difference in education and training. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
18. Scott, G. (2003, November/December). Effective change management in higher education. Educause Review, 38(6), 64-80.
19. Sell, G. R., & Lounsberry, B. (1997). Supporting curriculum development. In J. G. Gaff & J. L. Ratcliff (Eds.), Handbook of the undergraduate curriculum: A comprehensive guide to purposes, structures, practices, and change (pp. 661-683). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 6-9). New York: Macmillan.
21. Smith, D. G. (1989). The challenge of diversity: Involvement or alienation in the academy? (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 5). Washington DC: George Washington University.
22. Sorcinelli, M. D., Austin, A. E., Eddy, P. L., & Beach, A. L. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. Bolton, MA: Anker.
23. Taylor, K. L. (2005). Academic development as institutional leadership: An interplay of person, role, strategy, and institution. InternationalJournal for Academic Development, 10(1), 31-46