BRIEF INTERVENTION MODEL FOR ACCESS-BASED POSTSEPARATION DISPUTES: Family and Court Outcomes

Family Court Review

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 504-513

  Birnbaum, Rachel ^a   Radovanovic, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85170090327     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.174-1617.1999.tb00549.x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amato, P. R. 1994. Life-span adjustment of children to their parents' divorce. The Future of Children: Children and Divorce 4 (1): 143–64.
2. Amato, P., and B. Keith 1991. Parental divorce and the well-being of children: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 110 (1): 26–46.
3. Ash, P., and M. Guyer 1984. Court implications of mental health professionals' recommendations in contested custody and visitation cases. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 12 (2): 137–48.
4. Ash, P., and M. Guyer 1986. The functions of psychiatric evaluations in contested child custody and visitation cases. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 30:554–61.
5. Austin, G. W., and P. G. Jaffe 1990. Follow-up study of parents in custody and access disputes. Canadian Psychology 31:172–9.
6. Emery, R. 1988. Marriage, divorce, and children's adjustment. Developmental Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry Series 14. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Furstenberg, F. 1990. Divorce and the American family. Annual of Review of Sociology 16:379–403.
8. Hysjulien, C., B. Wood, and G. A. Benjamin 1994. Child custody evaluations: A review of methods used in litigation and alternate dispute resolution. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 32:466–89.
9. Irving, H., and M. Benjamin 1987. Family mediation: Theory and practise of dispute resolution. Toronto: Carswell.
10. Johnston, J. R. 1994. High-conflict divorce. The Future of Children: Children and Divorce 4(1): 165–82.
11. Johnston, J. R., and V. Roseby 1997. In the name of the child: A developmental approach to understanding and helping children in high conflict and violent divorced families. New York: Free Press.
12. Kruk, E. 1992. Psychological and structural factors contributing to the disengagement of noncustodial father after divorce. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30 (1): 81–101.
13. Maccoby, E. M., and R. Mnookin 1992. Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Mosten, F. S. 1992. Confidential mini-evaluation. Family and Conciliation Courts Review 30:373–84.
15. Radovanovic, H., C. Bartha, M. Magnatta, E. Hood, A. Sagar, and M. McDonough 1994. Follow-up of families in custody/access assessments. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 12:427–35.
16. Simons, V. A., L. S. Grossman, and B. J. Weiner 1990. A study of families in high conflict custody disputes: Effects of psychiatric evaluation. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 18 (1): 85–97.
17. Smith, R. 1997. Child custody evaluation: “You get what you need.” Family and Conciliation Courts Review 35:336–41.
18. Statistics Canada. 1997. Divorces 1995. Catalog 84–213. Ottawa: Minister of Industry, Science and Technology.
19. Tobin, P. 1990. Clinical recommendations for sole custody in child custody disputes: An analysis of sex-related factors in the decision-making and assessment process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto.
20. Weissman, H. N. 1991. Child custody evaluations: Fair and unfair professional practices. Behavioural Sciences and the Law 9:469–76.