Definitions and Dimensions of Etiquette

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-02-02, Issue , 2002, Pages 1-7

  Miller, Christopher A ^a  

^a SMART INFORMATION FLOW TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER WORK; HUMAN RELATIONSHIPS; HUMAN-CENTRED DESIGNS; HUMAN-COMPUTER ETIQUETTE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 85169613129     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Miller, C. 2000. “Rules of Etiquette, or How a Mannerly AUI should Comport Itself to Gain Social Acceptance and be Perceived as Gracious and Well-Behaved in Polite Society”. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium Workshop on Adaptive User Interfaces. Stanford, CA; March 20-22.
2. Horvitz, E. 1999. Principles of Mixed-Initiative User Interfaces. Proceedings of CHI '99, ACM SIG-CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Pittsburgh, PA, May.
3. Miller, C. and Hannen, M. 1999. “The Rotorcraft Pilot's Associate: Design and Evaluation of an Intelligent User Interface for a Cockpit Information Manager”. Knowledge Based Systems, 12. pp. 443-456.
4. Miller, C. and Funk, H. 2001. “Associates with Etiquette: Meta-Communication to Make Human-Automation Interaction more Natural, Productive and Polite”. In Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Cognitive Science Approaches to Process Control. September 24-26, 2001; Munich, pp. 329-338.
5. Preece, J. (Ed.) 2002. Supporting Community and Building Social Capital. In Communications of the ACM, 4(4), April. pp.36-73.
6. Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S. and Churchill, E. (Ed.) 2000. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Billings, C. 1997. Aviation Automation: The search for a human-centered approach. Erlbaum. Mahwah, NJ.
8. Morris, W. (Ed.). 1978. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Houghton Mifflin, Boston. p. 451.
9. Davis, J.. 2002. Understanding and decreasing adversive behavior in online social contexts. This volume.
10. Whitworth, B. 2002. Polite Computing: Software that respects the user. This volume.
11. Louwerse, M., Graesser, A., Olney, A. and the Tutoring Research Group. 2002. Good Computational manners: Mixed-initiative dialog in conversational agents. This volume.
12. Edwards, J., Scott, G., McFadden, S. and Hendy, K. 2002. Traps, pitfalls, swindles, lies, doubts and suspicions in human-computer interactions: A counter-case for the study of good etiquette. This volume.
13. Brown, P. and Levinson, S. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK.
14. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
15. Corker, K. 2002. Performance impacts of digital communication in aerospace operations: Roger, Over. This volume.
16. McNeese, M., Salas, E. and Endsley, M. 2001. New trends in cooperative activities: understanding system dynamics in complex environments. HFES. Santa Monica, CA.
17. Norman, D. 2002. Emotion and Design: Attractive things work better. Interactions. July/August. Pp36-42.
18. Woodbury, M. 2002. Computer and Information Ethics. Stipes; Champaign, IL.
19. Vicente, K. 1999. Cognitive Work Analysis. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.