Cognitive Principles of Graphic Displays

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-97-03, Issue , 1997, Pages 116-124

  Tversky, Barbara ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AS GRAPH; COGNITIVE PRINCIPLES; GRAPHICS DISPLAY;

EID: 85169611448     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Beniger, J. R. &Robyn, D. L. 1978. Quantitative graphics in statistics. TheAmericanStatistician, 32:l-11.
2. Bower, G. H. 1970. Analysis of a mnemonic device. AmericanScientist, 58:496-510.
3. Carswell, C. M. 1992. Reading graphs: Interaction of processing requirements and stimulus structure. In B. Burns(Ed.), Percepts, concepts, andcategories. (605-645). Amsterdam:Elsevier.
4. Carswell, C. M. and Wickens, C. D. 1988. Comparative graphics: history and applications of perceptual integrality theory and the proximity compatibility hypothesis. Technical Report, Institute of Aviation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
5. Carswell, C. M. &Wickens, C. D. 1990. The perceptual interaction of graphic attributes: Configurality, stimulus homogeneity, and object integration. Perception and Psychophysics, 47:157-168.
6. Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. (27-63). NewYork: Academic Press.
7. Cleveland, W.S. 1984. Graphsin scientific publications. TheAmericanStatistician, 38:261-269.
8. Cleveland, W.S. 1985. The elements of graphing data. Monterey, CA:Wadsworth.
9. Coulmas, F. 1989. The writing systems of the world. Oxford:Basil Blackwell.
10. Cooper, W. E. &Ross, J. R. 1975. Worldorder. In R. E. Grossman, L. J. San, & T. J. Vance, (Eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Functionalism Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
11. DeFrances, J. 1989. Visible speech: The diverse oneness of writing systems. Honolulu:University of HawaiiPress.
12. Franklin, N. and Tversky, B. 1990. Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119:63-76.
13. Franklin, N., Tversky, B., and Coon, V. 1992. Switching points of viewin spatial mental modelsacquired fromtext. Memor)'and Cognition, 20:507-518.
14. Gattis, M. and Holyoak, K. J. 1996. Mappingconceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22:1-9.
15. Gelb, I. 1963. A study of writing. Secondedition. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.
16. Goodman, Nelson. Languages of art: An approach to a theoty of symbols. NewYork: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
17. Howard, I. P. 1982. Humanvisual orientation. NewYork: Wiley.
18. Huff, D. 1954. Howto lie with statistics. NewYork: Norton.
19. Hughes, M. 1986. Children and number: Difficulties in learning mathenzatics. Oxford:Blackwell.
20. Ittelson, W. H. 1996. Visual perception of markings. P.~ychonomicBulletin &Review, 3:171-187.
21. Kosslyn, S. M. 1989. Understanding Charts and Graphs. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3:185-223.
22. Kosslyn, S. M.1994. Elements of graphdesign. NewYork: Freeman.
23. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of ChicagoPress.
24. Levin, I. & Tolchinsky Landsmann, L. 1989. Becoming literate: Referential and phoneticstrategies in early reading and writing. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 12:369-384
25. Levy, E., Zacks, J., Tversky, B. and Schiano, D. 1996. Gratuitous graphics: Putting preferences in perspective. Humanfactors in computing systems: Conference proceedings (42-49). NY:ACM.
26. Macken, E., Perry, J. and Haas, C. 1993. Richly grounded symbolsin ASL.Sign LanguageStudies, 81:375-394.
27. Mallery, G. 1893/1972. Picture writing of the American Indians. (Originally published by GovernmentPrinting Office). NY:Dover.
28. Narayanan, N. H., Suwa, M., and Motoda, H. 1994. A study of diagrammatic reasoning from verbal and gestural data. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Neurath, O., 1936.
29. International Picture Language:TheFirst Rules of Isotype. London:KeganPaul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.
30. Pinker, S. 1990. A theory of graph comprehension. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. (73-126). Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
31. Schiano, D. and Tversky, B. 1992. Structure and strategy in viewing simple graphs. Memoryand Cognition, 20:12-20.
32. Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1992. Before writing, Volume1: Fromcounting to cuneiform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
33. Smith, M. C. and McGee, L. E. 1980. Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:.General, 109:373-392.
34. Spence, I. & Lewandowsky, S. 1991. Displaying proportions and perentages. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5:61-77.
35. Stenning, K. and Oberlander, J. 1995. A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: Logic and implementation. Cognitive Science, 19:97-140.
36. Stevens, S. S. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement.Science, 103:677-680.
37. Suwa, M. &Tversky, B. 1996. Whatarchitects see in their sketches: Implications for design tools. Humanfactors in computing systems: Conference companion, 191-192. NY: ACM.
38. Taylor, H. A. and Tversky, B. Indexing events in memory: Evidence for index preferences. Memory.Forthcoming.
39. Tufte, E. R. 1983. The visual display of quantitative information. Cheshire, CT:GraphicsPress.
40. Tufte, E. R. 1990. Envisioning information. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
41. Tufte, E. R. 1997. Visual explanations. Cheshire, CT: GraphicsPress.
42. Tversky, B. 1995. Cognitive origins of graphic conventions. In F. T. Marchese (Editor). Understanding images. (29-53). NewYork: Springer-Verlag.
43. Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S. and Winter, A. 1991. Cross-cultural and developmentaltrends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23:515-557.
44. Wainer, H. 1980. Makingnewspapergraphs fit to print. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad and H. Bouma(Eds.), Processing of visible language2. (125-142). NY:Plenum.
45. Wainer, H. 1984. Howto display data badly. The American Statistician, 38:137-147.
46. Wainer, H. 1992. Understanding graphs and tables. EducationalResearcher, 21: 14-23.
47. Yates. F. A. 1969. The art of memory.NewYork: Penguin.
48. Yin, R. K. 1969. Lookingat upside-downfaces. Jounzal of ExperimentalPsychology, 81: 141-45.