Notes on the Use of Plan Structures in the Creation of Interactive Plot

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-99-01, Issue , 1999, Pages 164-167

  Young, R Michael ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85169312645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Bal, M.1997. Narralology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
2. Brannigan, E. 1992. Narrative Comprehension and Film. NewYork: Routledge.
3. Comisky, P., and Bryant, J. 1982. Factors involved in generating suspense. HumanCommunication Research 9(1):49-58.
4. Doyle, P., and ttayes-Roth, B. 1998. Agents in annotated worlds. In Proceedingsof the SecondInternational Conference on AutonomousAgents.
5. Gerrig, R., and Bernardo, D. 1994. Readers as problem-solvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics 22:459-472.
6. Greenberg, D. P. 1999. A frameworkfor realistic image synthesis. Communicationsof the ACM42(8):45-53.
7. Grice, H. P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 68:377-388.
8. Kambhampati,S.; Knobloek, C.; and Qiang, Y. 1995. Planning as refinement search: a unified frameworkfor evaluating design tradeoffs in partial-order planning. Artificial Intelligence 76:167-238.
9. Ohler, P., and Nieding, G. 1983. Cognitive modeling of suspense-inducingstructures in films. In Vorderer, P.; Wulff, H.; and Friedrichsen, M., eds., Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses andempirical ezplirations. LawrenceErlbaum. 167-208.
10. Reeves, B., and Nass, C. 1996. The Media Equation: HowPeople Treat Computers, Television, and NewMedia Like Real People and Places. Cambridge University Press.
11. Rimmon-Keenan,S. 1983. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. London: Routledge.
12. Ryan,M.1991. PossibeWorlds, Artificial Intelligence and.Narrative Theory. Bloomington,IN: Indiana University Press.
13. Sacerdoti, E. D. 1977. A Structure for Plans and Behavior. Artificial Intelligence Series. NewYork, New York: Elsevier North-Holland, Inc.
14. Schank, R. C., and Abelson, R. P. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals andUnderstanding. Hillsdale, NewJersey: LawrenceErlbaumAssociates.
15. VCalton, K. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: Onethe Foundationof the Representational Arts. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Young,R. M.; Pollack, M.E.; and Moore,J. D. 1994. Decompositionandcausality in partial order planning.
17. In Proceedingsof the SecondInternational Conference on AI and Planning Systems, 188-193.
18. Young, R. M. 1999. Cognitive and computational models of suspense: Towardsthe automatic creation of suspense in interactive narratives. Paper presented at Interactive Frictions: The ConferenceProducedat the Pressure Point Between Theory and Practive: An International Conferenceon Interactive _Narrative, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.