Elections: The Politics of the Permanent Campaign: Presidential Travel and the Electoral College, 1977-2004

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 749-773

  Doherty, Brendan J ^a  

^a UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85169091147     PISSN: 03604918     EISSN: 17415705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02623.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Althaus, Scott L., Peter F. Nardulli, and Daron R. Shaw. 2002. Candidate appearances in presidential elections, 1972-2000. Political Communication 19: 49-72.
2. Bartels, Larry M. 1985. Resource allocation in a presidential campaign. Journal of Politics 47:928-36.
3. Blumenthal, Sidney. 1980. The permanent campaign: Inside the world of elite political operatives. Boston: Beacon Press.
4. Bowman, Karlyn. 2000. Polling to campaign and to govern. In The permanent campaign and its future, edited by Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann, 54-74. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution.
5. Brams, Steven J., and Morton D. Davis. 1974. The 3/2's rule in presidential campaigning. American Political Science Review 68(1): 113-34.
6. Cameron, A. Colin, and Pravin K. Trivedi. 1998. Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Carter, John R., and David Schap. 1987. Executive veto, legislative override, and structure-induced equilibrium. Public Choice 52: 227-44.
8. Colantoni, Claude S., Terrence J. Levesque, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1975. Campaign resource allocations under the Electoral College. American Political Science Review 69(1): 141-54.
9. Dahl, Robert A. 2003. How democratic is the American Constitution? 2d ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10. Dearden, James A., and Thomas Husted. 1990. Executive budget proposal, executive veto, legislative override, and uncertainty. Public Choice 65: 1-19.
11. Edwards, George C. III. 2004. Why the Electoral College is bad for America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12. Eggen, Dan. 2000. With Nebraska, Clinton makes it 50-50. Washington Post, December 9, p. A2.
13. Fitts, Michael, and Robert Inman. 1992. Controlling Congress: Presidential influence in domestic fiscal policy. Georgetown Law Review 80: 1737-85.
14. Goux, Darshan J., and David A. Hopkins. 2006. The empirical implications of Electoral College reform. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 20-23, Chicago.
15. Hart, Roderick P. 1987. The sound of leadership: Presidential communication in the modern age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
16. Inman, Robert P. 1993. Local interests, central leadership, and the passage of TRA86. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12(1): 156-80.
17. James, Scott C. 2000. Presidents, parties, and the state: A party system perspective on democratic regulatory choice, 1884-1936. New York: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going public: New strategies of presidential leadership, 3d ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
19. Klein, Joe. 2005. The perils of the permanent campaign: Can the public live with an administration that is cutting corners and ignoring the details? Time, October 30. Retrieved April 28, 2006, from http://www.time.com/time/columnist/klein/article/0,9565,1124237,00.html.
20. Lacey, Marc. 2000. Nebraska, at last, gets a visit. New York Times, December 9, p. A8.
21. Lee, Frances E., and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. 1999. Sizing up the Senate: The unequal consequences of equal representation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
22. Lohmann, Susanne, and Sharyn O' Halloran. 1994. Divided government and U.S. trade policy: Theory and evidence. International Organization 48: 595-632.
23. Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Loomis, Burdett A. 2000. The never ending story: Campaigns without elections. In The permanent campaign and its future, edited by Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann, 162-84. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution.
25. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. McCarty, Nolan M. 2000. Presidential pork: Executive veto power and distributive politics. American Political Science Review 94(1): 117-29.
27. Ornstein, Norman, and Thomas Mann, eds. 2000. The permanent campaign and its future. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution.
28. Polsby, Nelson W. 1964. Congress and the presidency. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29. Polsby, Nelson W. 2002. Holy cow! Preliminary reflections on the 2000 election. In A badly flawed election: Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American democracy, edited by Ronald Dworkin, 265-283. New York: The New Press.
30. Polsby, Nelson W., and Aaron Wildavsky. 2004. Presidential elections: Strategies and structures of American politics, 11th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
31. Powell, Richard J. 1997. On the road again: Explaining presidential speechmaking and travel, 1961-1964. Ph.D. dissertation, Northwestern University.
32. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States. 1997-2004. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office. Available from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws; http://www.gpoaccess.gov/pubpapers/index.html; http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeches/publicpapers.html; http://www.bushlibrary.tamu.edu/research/paper.html; http://www.clinton6.nara.gov; http://www.whitehouse.gov/news.
33. Ragsdale, Lyn. 1998. Vital statistics on the presidency: Washington to Clinton, rev. ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
34. Rakove, Jack N. 2004. Presidential selection: Electoral fallacies. Political Science Quarterly 199: 21-37.
35. Reeves, Andrew. 2005. Political disaster? Presidential disaster declarations and electoral politics. Available from http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~reeves/papers/fema.pdf.
36. Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn. 1997. Presidents as candidates: Inside the White House for the presidential campaign. New York: Garland Publishing.
37. Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn. 2000. The American presidency: Surviving and thriving amidst the permanent campaign. In The permanent campaign and its future, edited by Norman Ornstein and Thomas Mann, 108-33. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute and the Brookings Institution.
38. Tenpas, Kathryn Dunn. 2003. Campaigning to govern: Presidents seeking reelection. PS: Political Science and Politics 36: 199-202.
39. United States Census. 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000. Available from http://www.census.gov.
40. Yunker, John A., and Lawrence D. Longley. 1972. The biases of the Electoral College: Who is really advantaged? In Perspectives on presidential selection, edited by Donald R. Matthews, 172-203. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.