Differentiation: Making Curriculum Work for All Students Through Responsive Planning & Instruction

Systems and Models for Developing Programs for the Gifted and Talented, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 599-628

  Tomlinson, Carol Ann ^a   Jarvis, Jane M ^b  

^a University of Virginia s Curry School of Education   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168875773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003419426-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press
2. Anderson, R, & Pavan, B. (1993). Nongradedness: Helping it to happen. Lancaster, PA: Technomic
3. Brimijoin, K. (2001). Expertise in differentiations preservice and inservice teacher make their way. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville
4. Bruner, J. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31 21-32
5. Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H., Moon, T. R, Tomlinson, C. A, & Callahan, C. M. (2003). Feasibility of high end learning in a diverse middle school (RM05210). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
6. Carbonaro, W, & Gamoran, A. (2002). The production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal, 39 801-807
7. Collins, M., & Amabile, T. (1999). Motivation and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge University Press
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper Collins
9. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure. New York: Cambridge University Press
10. Dunn, R, & Griggs, S. (1995). Multiculturalism and learning style: Teaching and counseling adolescents. Westport, CT: Praeger
11. Garcia, G. (1995). Equity challenges in authentically assessing students from diverse backgrounds. Educational Forum, 59(1) 64-73
12. Gardner, H. (1985). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
13. Gayfer, M. (1991)- The multi-grade classroom: Myth and reality. A Canadian study. Toronto: Canadian Education Association
14. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities, and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63 295-312
15. Hébert, Τ. P. (1993). Reflections at graduations: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16 22-28
16. Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Aexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
17. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
18. Marulanda, M., Giraldo, P., & Lopez, L. (2003, April). Differentiated instruction for bilingual learners. Presentation at Annual Conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, San Francisco, CA
19. Miller, B. (1990). A review of the quantitative research on multigrade instruction. Research in Rural Education, 7 3-12
20. National Research Council. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
21. Renninger, K. (1990). Children's play interests, representations, and activity. In R. Fivush & J. Hudson (Eds.), Knowing and remembering in young children (Emory Cognition Series, Vol. 3, pp. 127-165). New York: Cambridge University Press
22. Renninger, K. (1998). The roles of individual interest(s) and gender in learning: An overview of research on preschool and elementary school-aged children/students. In L. Hoffmann, A. Krapp, Κ. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning: Proceedings of the second conference on interest and gender (pp. 165-175). Kiel, Germany: IPN
23. Saxe, G. (1990). Culture and cognitive development: Studies in mathematical understanding. Hills-dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
24. Sharan, S., & Sharan, Y (1992). Expanding cooperative learning through group investigation. New York: Teachers College Press
25. Sousa, D. (2001). How the brain learns (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
26. Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
27. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223-243). New York: Cambridge University Press
28. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster
29. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1997). Are cognitive styles still in style? American Psychologist, 52 700-712
30. Sternberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Teaching triarchically improves student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90 374-384
31. Sullivan, M. (1993). A meta-analysis of experimental research studies on the Dunn & Dunn learning styles model and its relationship to academic achievement and performance. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY
32. Tieso, C. L. (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students' math achievement (RM02154). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut
33. Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64 37-54
34. Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
35. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
36. Tomlinson, C. A. (2003). Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
37. Tomlinson, C. A, & Alan, S. (2000). Leadership for differentiating schools and classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
38. Tomlinson, C. A, Brighton, C. M., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R, Brimijoin, K, et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27 119-145
39. Tomlinson, C. Α., Brimijoin, K., & Narvaez, L. (in press). Making change for schoolwide differentiation. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
40. Tomlinson, C. Α., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J. H., Leppien, J., & Burns, D. E. (2001). The parallel curriculum model: A design to develop high potential and challenge high-ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin
41. Tomlinson, C. A, & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction and understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
42. Torrance, Ε. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7 313-322
43. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
45. Wiggins, C, & McTighe, J. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
46. Wolfe, Ρ (2001). Brain matters: Translating research into classroom practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development