History Lessons: Historians and the Scholarship of Teaching and Leaming

Disciplinary Styles in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 45-67

  Calder, Lendol ^a   Cutler, William W ^b   Kelly, T Mills ^c  

^a AUGUSTANA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168858814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781003444268-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Bain, R.B. (2000). “Into the Breach: Using Research and Theory to Shape History Instruction.” In Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives, edited by P. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg, pp. 331-352. New York: New York University Press.
2. Barringer, F. (February 7, 2001). “From Gore, an Off-the-Record (Kind of) Lecture.” New York Times: A17.
3. Bass, R. (1999). “The Scholarship of Teaching: What’s the Problem?" Inventio 1: 1. Retrieved February 19, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://www.doiit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/randybass.htm.
4. Booth, A., and P. Hyland, eds. (2000). The Practice of University History Teaching. New York: Manchester University Press.
5. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
6. Cambridge, B. (December 1999). “The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Questions and Answers From the Field.” AAHE Bulletin 52(4): 7-10.
7. Cross, K.P. (March 24, 1998). “What Do We Know About Students’ Learning and How Do We Know It?" Paper presented at the AAHE National Conference on Higher Education, Atlanta, Georgia.
8. Cuban, L. (1999). How Scholars Trumped Teachers: Constancy and Change in University Curriculum, Teaching, and Research, 1890-1990. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Dow, P. (1991). Schoolhouse Politics: Lessons From the Sputnik Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Geiger, R.L. (1993). Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since WW II. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Gillespie, S.W. (1999). Perspectives on Teaching Innovations: Teaching to Think Historically. Washington, DC: American Historical Association.
12. Hake, R.R. (January 1998). “Interactive Engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A Six Thousand Student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physics Courses.” American Journal of Physics 66(1): 64-74.
13. Halldén, O. (1994). “On the Paradox of Understanding History in an Educational Setting.” In Teaching and Learning in History, edited by G. Leinhardt, I.L. Beck, and C. Stainton, pp. 27-46. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Holt, T. (1990). Thinking Historically: Narrative, Imagination, and Understanding. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
15. Horowitz, H.L. (1987). Campus Life: Undergraduate Cultures From the End of the 18th Century to the Present. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Hutchings, P. (1996). '“But Is It Working?' Learning Issues: Peer Learning, Intellectual Development, and Critical Thinking.” In Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching, edited by K.P. Cross and M.H. Steadman, pp. 161-196. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17. Kobrin, D. (1992). “It’s My Country, Too: A Proposal for a Student Historian’s History of the United States.” Teachers College Record 94(2): 329-342.
18. Kramer, L. (February 2001). “The Language of Historical Education.” History and Theory 40: 91-93.
19. Leinhardt, G., I.L. Beck, and C. Stainton, eds. (1994). Teaching and Learning in History. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Levine, L.W. (1996). The Opening of the American Mind. Boston: Beacon Press.
21. Norris, K. (1996). The Cloister Walk. New York: Riverhead Books.
22. Novick, P. (1988). That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Paxton, R.J., and S.S. Wineburg. (2000). “History Teaching.” In Routledge International Companion to Education, edited by B. Moon, S. Brown, and M. Ben-Peretz, pp. 855-864. New York: Routledge.
24. Rayson, D., E.L. Farmer, and R. Frame. (January 1999). “Preparing Future Faculty: Teaching the Academic Life.” AHA Perspectives 37(1): 1-13.
25. Rubin, J.S. (1998). “Listen, My Children: Modes and Functions of Poetry Reading in American Schools, 1880-1950.” In Moral Problems in American Life: New Perspectives on Cultural History, edited by K. Halttunen and L. Perry, pp. 261-281. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Sherry, M.S. (1994). “We Value Teaching Despite -and Because of -Its Low Status.” Journal of American History 81(3): 1051-1054.
27. Shulman, L.S. (November/December 1993). “Teaching as Community Property: Putting an End to Pedagogical Solitude.” Change 25(6): 6-7.
28. Stahl, S.A., et al. (1997). “What Happens When Students Read Multiple Source Documents in History?" Retrieved February 21, 2001, from the World Wide Web: http://curry.edschool.virginia.edu/go/clic/nrrc /hist_r45.html.
29. Stearns, P., P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg, eds. (2000). Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives. New York: New York University Press.
30. Thelen, D. (1994). “The Practice of American History.” Journal of American History 81(3): 933.
31. Trifan, D.D. (1999). “Active Learning: A Critical Examination.” In Perspectives on Teaching Innovations: Teaching to Think Historically, edited by S.W. Gillespie, pp. 68-79. Washington, DC: American Historical Association.
32. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1993). Characteristics and Attitudes of Instructional Faculty and Staff in the Humanities. National Study of Postsecondary Faculty. Washington, DC: Author.
33. Veysey, L. (1965). The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Voss, J.F., and M. Carretero, eds. (1998). Learning and Reasoning in History, Vol. 2. London: Woburn Press.
35. Wiggins, G., and J. McTighe. (1998). Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
36. Wineburg, S.S. (1991). “Historical Problem Solving: A Study of the Cognitive Processes Used in the Evaluation of Documentary and Pictorial Evidence.” Journal of Educational Psychology 83(1): 73-87.
37. Wineburg, S.S. (1992). “Probing the Depths of Students’ Historical Knowledge.” AHA Perspectives 30(3): 1-24.
38. Wineburg, S.S. (1994). “The Cognitive Representation of Historical Texts.” In Teaching and Learning in History, edited by G. Leinhardt, I.L. Beck, and C. Stainton, pp. 85-135. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Wineburg, S.S. (2000). “Making Historical Sense.” In Knowing, Teaching, and Learning History: National and International Perspectives, edited by P. Stearns, P. Seixas, and S. Wineburg, pp. 306-325. New York: New York University Press.
40. Wineburg, S.S. and S.M. Wilson. (September 1988). “Models of Wisdom in the Teaching of History.” Phi Delta Kappan: 50-58.