Cenozoic granitoid in Tengchong, western Yunnan: Genesis type and implication for tectonics;滇 西 腾 冲 新 生 代 花 岗 岩 : 成 因 类 型 与 构 造 意 义

Yanshi Xuebao/Acta Petrologica Sinica

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 927-937

  Doeng, FangLiu ^a   Hou, ZengQian ^b   Gao, YongFeng ^c   Zeng, PuSheng ^a   Jiang, ChengXing ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF MINERAL RESOURCES   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (China)

^c Shijiazhuang College of Economy   (China)

^d Geological Survey of Yunnan Province   (China)

Author keywords

Cenozoic; Genetic type; Granitoid; Structural application; Tengchong

Indexed keywords

EID: 85168641462     PISSN: 10000569     EISSN: 20958927     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.0000/55c77da084e54444b38ad0bd88ccd5fa     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Barbarin B. 1990. Granitoids :main petrogenetic classification in raltion to origin and tectonic setting. Geol. Jour., 25 :227-238
2. Barbarin B. 1999. A review of the relationships between granitoid types, their origins and their geodynamic environments.Lithos, 46 :605-626
3. Beck R A, Burbank D P, Sercombe P J, et a l. 1995. Stratigraphic evidence for an early collision between northwest India and Aisa. Nature, 373:55-58
4. Blisniuk P M, Hacker B, Glodny J, et al. 2001. Normal faulting in central Tibet since at least 13.5 Myr ago.Nature, 412! 628-632
5. Chen JS, Lin P B and Chen LZ. 1991. Series and unit research on Tinbearing granites of Tengchong-Lianghe area. Yunnan Geology, 10 (3) :241-289 (in Chinese with English abstract)
6. Coleman M and Hodges K. 1995. Evidence for Tibetan Plateau uplift before 14Ma ago from a new minimum age for east-west extension. Nature, 374: 49-52
7. DeCelles P G, Gehrels G E, Najiman Y, Martin A and Carter A, Garzanti E. 2004. Detrital geochronology and geochemistry of Cretaceous-early Miocene strata of Nepal: Implications for timing and diachroneity of initial Himalayan orogenies. Earth Panlet. Sci. Lett., 227: 313-330
8. DeSigoyer J, Guillot S, Lardeaux J M, Mascle G. 1997. Glaucophane-bearing eclogites in the Tso Morari dome (eastern Ladakh, N P Himalaya). European Jour. Mineral., 9: 1073-1083
9. Deniel C, Vidal P, Fernandez A, Le Fort P and Peucat JJ. 1987. Isotopic study of the manaslu granite (Himalaya, Nepal) :Inferences on the age and source of the Himalauyan leuogranites. Contrib. Miner. Petrol., 96:78-92
10. Ding L, Zhong D L, Yin A, Kapp P, Harrison T M.et al.2001. Cenozoic structural and metamorphic evolution of the eastern Himalayan syntaxis (Namche Barwa). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 192:423-438
11. England P, Le Fort P, Molnar P and Pecher A. 1992. Heat sources for Tertiary metamorphism and anatexis in the Annapurna-Manaslu region, Central Nepal. Jour. Geophys. Res., 97:2107-2128
12. Frost B R, Branes C G, Collins P J, Arculus R J, Ellis D J and Frost C D. 2001. A geochemical classification for genaitic rocks. Jour. Petrol., 42:2033-2048
13. Guillot S and Le Fort P. 1995. Geochemical constraints on the bimodal origin of High Himalayan leuogranites. Lithos, 35 :221-234
14. Guillot S, Hodges K V, Le Fort P and Pecher A. 1994. New constraints on the age of the Manaslu leuogranite:Evidence for episodic tectonic denudation in the central Himalaya. Geology, 22:559-562
15. Harris N, Inger S andMassey J. 1993. The roel of fluids in the formation of High Himalayan leuogranites. In:Searle M P and Treloar PJ (eds). Himalayan Tectonics. Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 74:391-400
16. Harrison T M and Mahon KI. 1995. New constraints on the age of the Manaslu leuogranite:Evidence for episodic tectonic denudation in the central Himalaya-Comment. Geology, 23:478-479
17. Harrison T M, Grove M, McKeegan K D, Coath C D, Lovera O M and Le Fort P. 1999. Origin and episodic emplacement of the Manaslu intrusive complex, central Himalaya. Jour. Petrol., 40 :3-19
18. H o u Z Q, Q u X M, P a n g S X, et a l. 2003. Re-Os ages of molybdenite in the Gangdese porphyry copper belt in south Tibet:duration of mineralization and application of the dynamic setting. Science in China, 33 :509 #618 (in Chinese)
19. H o u Z Q, Gao Y F, Q u X M, Rui Z Y, M o X X and Zhao Z D. 2004. Origin of adakitic intrusives generated during mid-Miocene east-west extension in southern Tibet. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 220: 139-155
20. Khan T, Khan M A, Jan M Q and Naseem M. 1996. Back-arc basin assemblages in Kohistan, Northern Pakistan, Geodin. Acta, 9:30-40
21. Le Fort P. 1975. Himalayas, the collided range, present knowledge of the continental arc. Amer. Jour. Sci., 275A :1-44
22. Le Fort P. 1981. Manaslu leuogranite: A collision signature of the Himalaya, a model for its genesis and emplacement. Jour. Geophys. Res., 86:10545-10568
23. L B X, Pang Z, Zhang N D, et al.1993. Granitoids and mineralization in Sanjing region. Beijing: Geological Publishing House. 158 (in Chinese with English abstract)
24. Maniar P D and Piccoli P M. 1989. Tectonic discrimination of granitoids. Geol. Soc. A m. Bull., 101: 635-643
25. Mao J P, Zhang SL and Rossi P. 1987. Sn-bearing granites of Tengchong, Yunnan Province, and the relationship between mineralization. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 3 (4):32-43 (in Chinese with English abstract)
26. Miller C, Schuster R, Klotzli U, Frank P and Purtscher F.1999. Post-collisional potassic and ultrapotassic magmatism in S P Tibet:Geochemical and Sr-N d -Pb-O isotopic constraints for mantle source characteristics and petrogenesis. Jour. Petrol., 40:1399-1424
27. M o X X, Zhao Z D, Deng JF, et al. 2003, Response of volcanism to the India-Asia collision. Earth Science Frontiers, 10 (3) :135-148 (in Chinese with English abstract)
28. M o X X, Dong G C, Zhao Z D, G u o T Y, W a n g L L and Chen T. 2005. Timing of m a g m a mixing in the Gangdese magmatic belt during the India-Asian collision:Zircon S H R I M P U -Pb dating. Acta Geologica Sinica, 79 ；66-76
29. Pognante U and Spencer D A. 1991. First record of eclogites from the Himalayan belt, Kaghan valley, Northern Pakistan. Eur. J. Mineral., 3:613-618
30. Patriat P and Achache J. 1984. India-Eurasia collision chronology has implications for crustal shorting and driving mechanism of plate. Nature, 311: 615-621
31. Rowley D B. 1996. Age of initiation of collision between India and Asia A review of stratigraphic data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 145: 1-13
32. Sylvester PJ. 1998. Post-collision strongly peraluminous granits. Lithos, 45: 29-44
33. Turner S, Hawkesworth G, Liu J, et al. 1993. Timingof Tibetan uplift constrained by analysis of volcanic rocks.Nature, 36450-54
34. Vidal P, Cocherie A and Le Fort P. 1982. Geochemical investigations of the origin of theManaslu leuogranite (Himalaya, Nepal). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 46: 2279-2292
35. W a n g C S, Li X H and H u X M. 2003. Age of initial collision of India with Asia: Review and constraints from sediments in southern Tibet. Acta Geologica Sinica, 77 (1) :16-24 (in Chinese with English abstract)
36. W a n g J H, Yin A, Harrison T M, et al. 2001. A tectonic model for Cenozoic igneous activities in the eastern Indo-Asian collison zone. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 199: 123-133
37. Williams H, Turner S, Kelley S and Harris N. 2001. Age and composition of dikes in Southern Tibet:new constraints on the timing of east-west extension and lt &s relationship to post-collisional volcanism. Geology, 29:339-342
38. Xiao Q H, Deng JF, M a D Q, et al. 2002. The Ways of Investigation on Granitoids. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1-294 (in Chinese)
39. Yin A and Harrison T M. 2000. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan orogen. J. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 28:211-280
40. Zhong D L, Ding L, Liu F T, Liu J H, Zhang JJ, Ji JQ and Chen H. 2001. The poly-layered architecture of lithosphere in the orogen and its constraint on Cenozoic magmatism. Science in China, 30 :1-8 (in Chinese)