Cost-Effective HITs for Relative Similarity Comparisons

Proceedings of the 2nd AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing, HCOMP 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 227-233

  Wilber, Michael J ^a   Kwak, Iljung S ^b   Belongie, Serge J ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS;

BEST PRACTICES; COST EFFECTIVE; EMBEDDINGS; FINANCIAL COSTS; HUMAN INTELLIGENCE; MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS; SAMPLING ALGORITHM; SAMPLING TECHNIQUE; VISION LEARNING; WORKERS';

EMBEDDINGS;

EID: 85167413808     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Ferecatu, M., and Geman, D. 2009. A statistical framework for image category search from a mental picture. IEEE TPAMI.
2. Frome, A.; Singer, Y.; Sha, F.; and Malik, J. 2007. Learning globally-consistent local distance functions for shape-based image retrieval and classification. In IEEE ICCV.
3. Gomes, R.; Welinder, P.; Krause, A.; and Perona, P. 2011. Crowdclustering. NIPS.
4. Heikinheimo, H., and Ukkonen, A. 2013. The crowdmedian algorithm. In First AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing.
5. Jamieson, K., and Nowak, R. 2011. Low-dimensional embedding using adaptively selected ordinal data. In Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing.
6. Kendall, M., and Gibbons, J. D. 1990. Rank Correlation Methods. Charles Griffin Book Series. Oxford University Press, 5th edition edition.
7. Kittur, A.; Nickerson, J. V.; Bernstein, M.; Gerber, E.; Shaw, A.; Zimmerman, J.; Lease, M.; and Horton, J. 2013. The future of crowd work. In Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1301-1318. ACM.
8. Kleindessner, M., and von Luxburg, U. 2014. Uniqueness of ordinal embedding. JMLR.
9. McFee, B. 2012. More like this: machine learning approaches to music similarity. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
10. Rao, V. R., and Katz, R. 1971. Alternative multidimensional scaling methods for large stimulus sets. Journal of Marketing Research 8(4):488-494.
11. Tamuz, O.; Liu, C.; Belongie, S.; Shamir, O.; and Kalai, A. T. 2011. Adaptively learning the crowd kernel. In ICML.
12. van der Maaten, L., and Weinberger, K. 2012. Stochastic triplet embedding. In IEEE MLSP.
13. Wah, C.; Horn, G. V.; Branson, S.; Maji, S.; Perona, P.; and Belongie, S. 2014. Similarity comparisons for interactive fine-grained categorization. In IEEE CVPR.
14. Wolfe, J. M. 1994. Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1.
15. Yi, J.; Jin, R.; Jain, S.; and Jain, A. 2013. Inferring users preferences from crowdsourced pairwise comparisons: A matrix completion approach. In HCOMP.