Planning While Learning Operators

Proceedings of the 3rd Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems Conference, AIPS 1996

Volumn , Issue , 1996, Pages 229-236

  Wang, Xuemei ^a  

^a Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING ALGORITHMS; REPAIR;

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; EXPERT AGENTS; INTEGRATED SYSTEMS; LEARN+; LEARNING OPERATOR; LEARNING PROCESS; PLANNING DOMAINS; PLANNING OPERATORS; PLANNING WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION;

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 85166379792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Allen, J.; Hendler, J.; and Tate, A. 1990. Readings in Planning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
2. Anzai, Y., and Simon, H. A. 1979. The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review 86:124-140.
3. Benson, S. 1995. Inductive learning of reactive action models. In Proceedings of J2th International Conference on Machine Learning.
4. Carbonell, J.; Blythe, J.; Etzioni, O.; Gil, Y.; Joseph, R.; Kahn, D.; Knoblock, C; Minton, S.; Pérez, M. A.; Reilly, S.; Vcloso, M.; and Wang, X. 1992. PRODIGY 4.0: The Manual and "Ritorial. Technical report, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.
5. Chapman, D. 1987. Planning for conjunctive goals. Artificial Intelligence 32:333-378.
6. Chien, S.; Hill., R. J.; Wang, X.; Estlin, T.; Fayyad, K.; and Mortensen, H. 1995. Why real-world planning is difficult: A tale of two applications. In Ghallab, M., ed.. Advances in Planning. IOS Press.
7. Fikes, R. E., and Nilsson. N. J. 1971. STRIPS: a new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial intelligence 2(3,4): 189-208.
8. Gil, Y. 1991. A specification of manufacturing processes for planning. TR CMU-CS-91-179, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA.
9. G i l, Y. 1992. Acquiring Domain Knowledge for Planning by Experimentation. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
10. Hufftnan, S.; Pearson, D.; and Laird, J. 1993. Correcting imperfect domain theories: A knowledge-level analysis. In Chipman, S., and Meyrowitz, A. L., eds.. Foundations of Knowledge Acquisition: Congitive Models of Complex Learning. Boslon/Dordrecht/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Kambhampati, S. 1990. A theory of plan modification. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
12. Knoblock, C. 1995. Planning, executing, sensing, and replanning for information gathering. In Proc. IJCAÍ 95. McAUester, D., and Rosenblitt, D. 1991. Systematic nonlinear planning. In Proc. the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
13. Mitchell, T. 1978. Version Spaces: An Approach to Concept Learning. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University,. Pcnberthy, J., and Weld, D. 1992. UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL. In Proceedings ofKR-92.
14. Shen, W. 1989. Learning from Environment Based on Percepts and Actions. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Simmons, R. 1988. A theory of debugging plans and interpretations. In Proceedings ofthe Sixth National Conference on Artificiallntelligence.
16. Veloso, M.; Carbonell, J.; Pérez, M. A.; Borrajo, D.; Fink, E.; and Blythe, J. 1995. Integrating planning and learning: The PRODIGY architecture. Journal ofExperimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 7(1).
17. Wang, X. 1995. Learning by observation and practice: An incremental approach for planning operator acquisition. In Proceedings of 12th International Conference on Machine Learning.
18. Wang, X. 1996. Learning Planning Operators by Observation and Practice. Ph.D. Dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
19. Wilkins, D. 1988. Practical Planning: Extending the Classical AI Planning Paradigm. Morgan Kaufmann.