EMPIRICAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH CUSTODY RECOMMENDATIONS:: A Call for Clinical Humility and Judicial Vigilance

Family Court Review

Volumn 43, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 193-222

  Tippins, Timothy M ^a   Wittmann, Jeffrey P ^b  

^a ALBANY LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b The Center for Forensic Psychology Albany   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85165499698     PISSN: 15312445     EISSN: 17441617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00019.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ackerman, M., & Schoendorf, K. (1992). ASPECT: Ackerman-Schoendorf Scale for Parent Evaluation of Custody—Manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
2. American Psychological Association. (2003). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57(12), 1060–1073.
3. American Psychological Association. (1994). Guidelines for child custody evaluations for in divorce proceedings. American Psychologist, 49, 677–682.
4. Baerger, D. R., Galatzer-Levy, R., Gould, J. W., & Nye, S. G. (2002). A methodology for reviewing the reliability and relevance of child. Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, 18, 35–74.
5. Bagby, M. R., Nicholson, R. A., Buis, T., Radovanovic, H., & Fidler, B. (1999). Custody evaluations detecting malingered and defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in family custody and access evaluations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 62(2), 191–203.
6. Bauserman, R. (2002). Child adjustment in joint-custody vs. sole custody arrangements: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(1), 91–102.pmid/11915414
7. Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2001). Psychologists current practices and procedures in child custody evaluations five years after American Psychological Association guidelines. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(3), 261–268.
8. Bow, J. N., & Quinnell, F. A. (2004). Critique of child custody evaluations by the legal profession. Family Court Review, 42, 115–126.
9. Brennan, J. F. (2003). History and systems of psychology (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice-Hall.
10. Bricklin, B. (1989). Perception of Relationships Test manuel. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
11. Bricklin, B. (1984, 1990a). Bricklin Perceptual Scales manual. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
12. Bricklin, B. (1990b). Parent Awareness Skills Survey manual. Furlong, PA: Village Publishing.
13. Bricklin, B. (1992). Data-based tests in child custody evaluations. American Journal of Family Therapy, 20, 254–265.
14. Brodzinsky, D. M. (1993). On the use and misuse of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24(2), 213–219.
15. Butcher, J. N. (1997). Frequency of MMPI-2 scores in forensic evaluations. MMPI-2 News and Profiles, 8(1), 2–4.
16. Cummings, M. E., & Davies, P. (1994). Children and marital conflict: The impact of family dispute and resolution. New York: Guilford Press.
17. Felner, R. D., Rowlison, R. T., Farber, S. S., Primavera, J., & Bishop, T. A. (1987). Child custody resolution: A study of social science involvement and impact. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18, 468–474.
18. Foster, K. R., & Huber, P. W. (1997). Judging science: Scientific knowledge and the federal courts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Galatzer-Levy, R. M., & Kraus, L. (1999). The scientific basis of child custody decisions. New York: Wiley.
20. Garb, H. N. (1998). Studying the clinician. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Goldstein, J., Freud, A., & Solnit, A. (1973). Beyond the best interests of the child. New York: Free Press.
22. Gould, Jonathan W. (1998). Conducting scientifically crafted child custody evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23. Heilbrun, K. (2001). Forensic mental health assessment. New York: Kluwer Academic.
24. Hetherington, M., & Kelly, J. (2002). For better or for worse: Divorce reconsidered. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
25. Hetherington, M., & Stanley-Hagen, M. (2002). Parenting in divorced and remarried families. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 3). NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Horvath, L. S., Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2002). Child custody cases: A content analysis of evaluations in practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 33, 557–562.
27. Hynan, D. L. (2003). Parent-child observations in custody evaluations. Family Court Review, 41(2), 214–223.
28. Karra, D., & Berry, K. (1985). Custody evaluations: A critical review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(1), 76–85.
29. Karras, D., & Berry, K. K. (1985). Custody evaluations: A critical analysis. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 16(1), 76–85.
30. Kelly, J., & Lamb, M. (2000). Using child development research to make appropriate custody and access decisions for young children. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 297–311.
31. Krauss, D. A., & Sales, B. D. (1999). The problem of “helpfulness” in applying Daubert to expert testimony: Child custody determinations in family law as an exemplar. Psychology of Public Policy and Law, 5, 78–99.
32. Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K. J., Hershkowitz, I. & Horowitz, D. (2000). Accuracy of investigators verbatim notes of their forensic interviews with alleged child abuse victims. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 699–708.pmid/11105480
33. Lilienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., & Lohr, J. M. (2003). Science and pseudoscience in clinical psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
34. Lyon, T. D., & Koehler, J. J. (1996). The relevance ratio: Evaluating the probative value of expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases. Cornell Law Review, 82, 43–78.
35. Martindale, D. A. (2001). Cross-examining mental health experts in child custody litigation. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 29, 483–511.
36. Mayes, L. C., & Truman, S. D. (2002). Substance abuse and parenting. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4) (pp. 329–360). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. McCann, J. T., Flens, J. R., Campagna, V., Collman, P., Lazzaro, T., & Connor, E. (2001). The MCMI-III in child custody evaluations: A normative study. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 1, 27–44.
38. Melton, G. B., Weithorn, L. A., & Slobogin, C. (1985). Community mental health centers and the courts: An evaluation of community-based forensic services. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
39. Melton, G. B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N. G., & Slobogin, C. (1997). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
40. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., et al. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56(2), 128–165.pmid/11279806
41. O'Donohue, W., & Bradley, A. R. (1999). Conceptual and empirical issues in child custody evaluations. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 310–322.
42. Otto, R. K., Edens, J. F., & Barcus, E. H. (2000). The use of psychological testing in child custody evaluations. Family & Conciliation Courts Review, 38(3), 312–340.
43. Patterson, G. R., & Fisher, P. A. (2002). Recent developments in our understanding of parenting: Bidirectional effects, causal models, and the search for parsimony. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 5; pp. 55–88). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Pope, K. S., Butcher, J. N., & Seelen, J. (2000). MMPI, MMPI-2, & MMPI-A in court: A practical guide for expert witnesses and attorneys (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Reagan, R. T. (1999). Book review—judging science: Scientific knowledge and the federal courts, by Kenneth R. Foster & Peter W. Huber. Oklahoma Law Review, 52, 291–301.
46. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093–1104.pmid/11080829
47. Rubin, K. H., & Burgess, K. B. (2002). Parents of aggressive and withdrawn children. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Shuman, D. W. (2002). The role of mental health experts in custody decisions: Science, psychological tests, and clinical judgment. Family Law Quarterly, 36, 135.
49. Strong, J. (Ed.). (1999). McCormick on evidence (5th ed.) (Vols. 1–2). St. Paul, MN: West Group.
50. Teti, D. M., & Candelaria, M. A. (2002). Parenting competence. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4; pp. 149–180). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Tippins, T. M. (2003). Custody evaluations—Expertise by default? New York Law Journal, 230, 3.
52. Turk, D. C., & Salovey, P. (Eds.). (1988). Reasoning, inference, & judgment in clinical psychology. New York: Free Press.
53. Tutin, J. (1993). The persistence of initial beliefs in clinical judgment. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12(3), 319–335.
54. Waxler, Z. W., Duggal, S., & Gruber, R. (2002). Parenting and psychopathology. In M. H. Borstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (Vol. 4; pp. 295–328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Wigmore, J. (1979). Wigmore on evidence. Boston: Little Brown.
56. Wittmann, J. J. P. (1985). Child advocacy and the scientific model in family court: A theory for pre-trial self-assessment. The Journal of Psychiatry & Law, 13, 61–82.
57. Wittmann, J. J. P. (2003). Should forensic psychologists make custody recommendations? New York Family Law Monthly, 4(11), 1–3.
58. Wood, J. M., Nezworski, M. T., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Garb, H. N. (2003). What's wrong with the rorschach? Science confronts the controversial inkblot test. San Francisco: Jossy-Bass.