A more powerful two-sample test in high dimensions using random projection

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 24: 25th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2011, NIPS 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Lopes, Miles E ^a   Jacob, Laurent ^a   Wainwright, Martin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENE EXPRESSION; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION;

DATA DIMENSIONS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; HIGHER DIMENSIONS; HIGHER-DIMENSIONAL; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; MULTI-VARIATE NORMAL DISTRIBUTIONS; RANDOM PROJECTIONS; SAMPLE SIZES; TEST STATISTICS; TWO-SAMPLE TESTS;

STATISTICAL TESTS;

EID: 85162531971     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. E. L. Lehmann and J. P. Romano. Testing statistical hypotheses. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2005.
2. Y. Lu, P. Liu, P. Xiao, and H. Deng. Hotelling's T2 multivariate profiling for detecting differential expression in microarrays. Bioinformatics, 21(14):3105-3113, Jul 2005.
3. J. J. Goeman and P. Bühlmann. Analyzing gene expression data in terms of gene sets: methodological issues. Bioinformatics, 23(8):980-987, Apr 2007.
4. D. V. D. Ville, T. Blue, and M. Unser. Integrated wavelet processing and spatial statistical testing of fMRI data. Neuroimage, 23(4):1472-1485, 2004.
5. U. Ruttimann et al. Statistical analysis of functional MRI data in the wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(2):142-154, 1998.
6. Z. Bai and H. Saranadasa. Effect of high dimension: by an example of a two sample problem. Statistica Sinica, 6:311,329, 1996.
7. M. S. Srivastava and M. Du. A test for the mean vector with fewer observations than the dimension. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 99:386-402, 2008.
8. M. S. Srivastava. A test for the mean with fewer observations than the dimension under non-normality. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 100:518-532, 2009.
9. S. X. Chen and Y. L. Qin. A two-sample test for high-dimensional data with applications to gene-set testing. Annals of Statistics, 38(2):808-835, Feb 2010.
10. S. Clémençon, M. Depecker, and Vayatis N. AUC optimization and the two-sample problem. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2009), 2009.
11. A. Gretton, K. M. Borgwardt, M. Rasch, B. Schölkop, and A.J. Smola. A kernel method for the twosample-problem. In B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, and T. Hoffman, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, pages 513-520. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
12. Z. Harchaoui, F. Bach, and E. Moulines. Testing for homogeneity with kernel Fisher discriminant analysis. In John C. Platt, Daphne Koller, Yoram Singer, and Sam T. Roweis, editors, NIPS. MIT Press, 2007.
13. M. E. Lopes, L. J. Jacob, and M. J. Wainwright. A more powerful two-sample test in high dimensions using random projection. Technical Report arXiv: 1108.2401, 2011.
14. S. S. Vempala. The Random Projection Method. DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science. American Mathematical Society, 2004.
15. L. Jacob, P. Neuvial, and S. Dudoit. Gains in power from structured two-sample tests of means on graphs. Technical Report arXiv: q-bio/1009.5173v1, 2010.
16. J. A. Cuesta-Albertos, E. Del Barrio, R. Fraiman, and C. Matrán. The random projection method in goodness of fit for functional data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(10):4814-4831, 2007.
17. R. J. Muirhead. Aspects of Multivariate Statistical Theory. John Wiley & Sons, inc., 1982.
18. A. W. van der Vaart. Asymptotic Statistics. Cambridge, 2007.
19. A. P. Dempster. A high dimensional two sample significance test. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 29(4):995-1010, 1958.
20. A. P. Dempster. A significance test for the separation of two highly multivariate small samples. Biometrics, 16(1):41-50, 1960.
21. R.W. Tothill et al. Novel molecular subtypes of serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer linked to clinical outcome. Clin Cancer Res, 14(16):5198-5208, Aug 2008.
22. J. Moreaux et al. A high-risk signature for patients with multiple myeloma established from the molecular classification of human myeloma cell lines. Haematologica, 96(4):574-582, Apr 2011.
23. R. N. Jorissen et al. Metastasis-associated gene expression changes predict poor outcomes in patients with dukes stage b and c colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res, 15(24):7642-7651, Dec 2009.
24. A. Subramanian et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 102(43):15545-15550,Oct 2005.
25. T. Beissbarth and T. P. Speed. Gostat: find statistically overrepresented gene ontologies within a group of genes. Bioinformatics, 20(9):1464-1465, Jun 2004.