Deciphering subsampled data: Adaptive compressive sampling as a principle of brain communication

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 23: 24th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2010, NIPS 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Isely, Guy ^a   Hillar, Christopher J ^b   Sommer, Friedrich T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPRESSIVE SAMPLING; NEURAL POPULATIONS; OVER-COMPLETE; RECONSTRUCTING SIGNALS; RESPONSE PROPERTIES; SPARSE CODES; SPARSE REPRESENTATION;

COMPRESSED SENSING;

EID: 85162025941     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. A. Bell and T. Sejnowski. Learning the higher-order structure of a natural sound. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 7(2):261-266, 1996.
2. E.J. Candès. Compressive sampling. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, volume 3, pages 1433-1452. Citeseer, 2006.
3. M. Elad. Optimized projections for compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 55(12):5695-5702, 2007.
4. S. Gleichman and Y.C. Eldar. Blind Compressed Sensing. preprint, 2010.
5. H. Lee, A. Battle, R. Raina, and A.Y. Ng. Efficient sparse coding algorithms. Advances in neural information processing systems, 19:801, 2007.
6. B.A. Olshausen and D.J. Field. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature, 381(6583):607-609, 1996.
7. M. Rehn and F.T. Sommer. A network that uses few active neurones to code visual input predicts the diverse shapes of cortical receptive fields. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 22(2):135-146, 2007.
8. C.J. Rozell, D.H. Johnson, R.G. Baraniuk, and B.A. Olshausen. Sparse coding via thresholding and local competition in neural circuits. Neural computation, 20(10):2526-2563, 2008.
9. D.L. Ruderman and W. Bialek. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters, 73(6):814-817, 1994.
10. A. Schüz, D. Chaimow, D. Liewald, and M. Dortenman. Quantitative aspects of corticocortical connections: a tracer study in the mouse. Cerebral Cortex, 16(10):1474, 2006.
11. E.C. Smith and M.S. Lewicki. Efficient auditory coding. Nature, 439(7079):978-982, 2006.
12. M. Sur, P.E. Garraghty, and A.W. Roe. Experimentally induced visual projections into auditory thalamus and cortex. Science(Washington), 242(4884):1437-1437, 1988.
13. F.E. Theunissen, S.V. David, N.C. Singh, A. Hsu, W.E. Vinje, and J.L. Gallant. Estimating spatio-temporal receptive fields of auditory and visual neurons from their responses to natural stimuli. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 12(3):289-316, 2001.
14. D.C. Van Essen, C.H. Anderson, and D.J. Felleman. Information processing in the primate visual system: an integrated systems perspective. Science, 255(5043):419-423, 1992.
15. 1-constrained quadratic programming (Lasso). IEEE Trans. Information Theory, pages 2183-2202, 2009.
16. Y. Weiss, H. Chang, and W. Freeman. Learning compressed sensing. In Snowbird Learning Workshop, Allerton, CA. Citeseer, 2007.
17. R.J. Wyman and J.B. Thomas. What genes are necessary to make an identified synapse? In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, volume 48, page 641. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1983.