The discriminant center-surround hypothesis for bottom-up saliency

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 20 - Proceedings of the 2007 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Gao, Dashan ^a   Mahadevan, Vijay ^a   Vasconcelos, Nuno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FORECASTING; MEMORY ARCHITECTURE; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS;

A-CENTER; BOTTOM-UP SALIENCIES; DECISION-THEORETIC; DISCRIMINANT POWER; EYE FIXATIONS; IMAGE LOCATIONS; NONLINEAR PROPERTIES; OPTIMAL SOLUTIONS; QUANTITATIVE PREDICTION; SETS OF FEATURES;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 85161993174     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. N. D. Bruce and J. K. Tsotsos. Saliency based on information maximization. In Proc. NIPS, 2005.
2. R. Buccigrossi and E. Simoncelli. Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 8:1688-1701, 1999. (Pubitemid 30527916)
3. A. B. Chan and N. Vasconcelos. Modeling, clustering, and segmenting video with mixtures of dynamic textures. IEEE Trans. PAMI, In Press.
4. M. N. Do and M. Vetterli. Wavelet-based texture retrieval using generalized gaussian density and kullback-leibler distance. IEEE Trans. Image Processing, 11(2):146-158, 2002. (Pubitemid 34278451)
5. G. Doretto, A. Chiuso, Y. N. Wu, and S. Soatto. Dynamic textures. Int. J. Comput. Vis., 51, 2003.
6. D. Gao and N. Vasconcelos. Discriminant saliency for visual recognition from cluttered scenes. In Proc. NIPS, pages 481-488, 2004.
7. D. Gao and N. Vasconcelos. Decision-theoretic saliency: computational principle, biological plausibility, and implications for neurophysiology and psychophysics. submitted to Neural Computation, 2007.
8. J. Harel, C. Koch, and P. Perona. Graph-based visual saliency. In Proc. NIPS, 2006.
9. J. Huang and D. Mumford. Statistics of Natural Images and Models. In Proc. IEEE Conf. CVPR, 1999.
10. D. H. Hubel and T. N. Wiesel. Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J. Neurophysiol., 28:229-289, 1965.
11. L. Itti and C. Koch. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40:1489-1506, 2000. (Pubitemid 30216462)
12. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 20(11), 1998.
13. S. G.Mallat. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: The wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. PAMI, 11(7):674-693, 1989.
14. H. C. Nothdurft. The conspicuousness of orientation and motion contrast. Spat. Vis., 7, 1993.
15. Y. Sheikh and M. Shah. Bayesian modeling of dynamic scenes for object detection. IEEE Trans. on PAMI, 27(11):1778-92, 2005. (Pubitemid 41685113)
16. C. Stauffer and W. Grimson. Adaptive background mixture models for real-time tracking. In CVPR, pages 246-52, 1999.
17. B. W. Tatler, R. J. Baddeley, and I. D. Gilchrist. Visual correlates of fixation selection: effects of scale and time. Vision Research, 45:643-659, 2005. (Pubitemid 40037974)
18. A. Treisman and G. Gelade. A feature-integratrion theory of attention. Cognit. Psych., 12, 1980.
19. A. Treisman and S. Gormican. Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95:14-58, 1988.
20. A. Tversky. Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev., 84, 1977.
21. N. Vasconcelos. Scalable discriminant feature selection for image retrieval. In CVPR, 2004.
22. D. Walther and C. Koch. Modeling attention to salient proto-objects. Neural Networks, 19, 2006.
23. J. Zhong and S. Sclaroff. Segmenting foreground objects from a dynamic textured background via a robust Kalman filter. In ICCV, 2003.
24. Z. Zivkovic. Improved adaptive Gaussian mixture model for background subtraction. In ICVR, 2004.