Cognitive Status and Form of Reference in Multimodal Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 685-690

  Kehler, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; INTERFACE STATES;

HIGH-ACCURACY; HUMAN-HUMAN INTERACTIONS; MULTI-MODAL TRAVELS; MULTIMODAL HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; NORMAL MODES; REFERRING EXPRESSIONS; SET OF RULES; SIMPLE++; USER INTERACTION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 85158093287     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Alshawi, H. 1987. Memory and Context for Language Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
2. Chafe, W. L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Li, C. N., ed., Subject and Topic. New York: Academic Press. 25-55.
3. Cheyer, A., and Julia, L. 1995. Multimodal maps: An agent-based approach. In Proceedings of CMC95, 103-113.
4. Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Cole, P., and Morgan, J., eds., Speech Acts. New York, New York: Academic Press. 41-58.
5. Grosz, B., and Sidner, C. 1986. Attention, intentions, and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics 12(3):175-204.
6. Grosz, B. J.; Joshi, A. K.; and Weinstein, S. 1995. Centering: A framework for modelling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics 21(2).
7. Gundel, J. K.; Hedberg, N.; and Zacharski, R. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2):274-307.
8. Huls, C.; Bos, E.; and Classen, W. 1995. Automatic referent resolution of deictic and anaphoric expressions. Computational Linguistics 21(1):59-79.
9. Julia, L., and Cheyer, A. 1997. Speech: a privileged modality. In Proceedings of EUROSPEECH'97, 103-113.
10. Lappin, S., and Leass, H. 1994. An algorithm for pronominal anaphora resolution. Computational Linguistics 20(4):535-561.
11. Martin, D.; Cheyer, A.; and Moran, D. 1999. The Open Agent Architecture: A framework for building distributed software systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 13(1-2):92-128.
12. Neal, J. G.; Dobes, Z.; Bettinger, K. E.; and Byoun, J. S. 1988. Multi-modal references in human-computer dialogue. In Proceedings of the 7th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-88), 819-823.
13. Oviatt, S., and Kuhn, K. 1998. Referential features and linguistic indirection in multimodal language. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP-98).
14. Oviatt, S. 1996. Multimodal interfaces for dynamic interactive maps. In Proceedings of CHI96, 95-105.
15. Passonneau, R. 1989. Getting at discourse referents. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-89), 51-59.
16. Prince, E. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P., ed., Radical Pragmatics. New York, New York: Academic Press. 223-255.
17. Prince, E. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information-status. In Thompson, S., and Mann, W., eds., Discourse Description: Diverse Analyses of a Fundraising Text. Philadelphia/Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V. 295-325.
18. Sidner, C. 1983. Focusing in the comprehension of definite anaphora. In Brady, M., and Berwick, R., eds., Computational Models of Discourse. MIT Press. 267-330.
19. Zancanaro, M.; Stock, O.; and Strapparava, C. 1997. Multimodal interaction for information access: exploiting cohesion. Computational Intelligence 13(7):439-464.