Assessing the Performance of Multisensor Fusion Processes

Handbook of Multisensor Data Fusion

Volumn , Issue , 2001, Pages 20-1-20-18

  Llinas, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85152303526     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9781420038545-23     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Linn, R.J., Hall, D.L., and Llinas, J., A Survey of Multisensor Data Fusion Systems, presented at the SPIE, Sensor Fusion Conference, Orlando, FL, April 1991.
2. Villars, D.S., Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments for Development Research, Wm. C. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa, 1951.
3. DeWitt, R.N., Principles for Testing a Data Fusion System, PSR (Pacific-Sierra Research, Inc.) Internal Report, March 1998.
4. Anon, A., Methodology for the test and evaluation of C3I systems, Vol. 1 - Methodology Description, Report 1ST-89-R-003A, prepared by Illgen Simulation Technologies, Santa Barbara, CA, May 1990.
5. International Test and Evaluation Association, Special Journal Issue on Test and Evaluation of C3IV, Vol. VIII, 2, 1987.
6. Llinas, J. et al., The test and evaluation process for knowledge-based systems, Rome Air Development Center Report RADC-TR-87-181, November 1987.
7. Przemieniecki, J.S., Introduction to mathematical methods in defense analysis, Amer. Inst. Of Aero. and Astro., Washington, D.C., 1985.
8. Bryant, M. and Garber, F., SVM classifier applied to the MSTAR public data set, Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3721, 1999.
9. Sweet, R., Command and control evaluation workshop, MORS C2 MOE Workshop, Military Operations Research Society, January 1985.
10. Summers, M.S. et al., Requirements on a fusion/tracker process of low observable vehicles, Final Report, Rome Laboratory/OCTM Contract No. F33657-82-C-0118, Order 0008, January 1986.
11. Mori, S. et al., Tracking performance evaluation: Prediction of track purity, SPIE, Vol. 1096, Signal and Data Processing of Small Targets, 1989.
12. Bar-Shalom, Y. et al., From receiver operating characteristic to system operating characteristic: Evaluation of a large-scale surveillance system, Proc. Of EASCON87, Washington, D.C., October 1987.
13. Fortmann, T.E. and Bar-Shalom, Y., Detection thresholds for tracking in clutter-A connection between estimation and signal processing, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 30, March 1985.
14. Kurniawan, Z. et al., Parametric optimization for an integrated radar detection and tracking system, IEEE Proc. (F), 132, 1, February 1985.
15. Nagarajan, V. et al., New approach to improved detection and tracking performance in track-whilescan-radars; Part 3: Performance prediction, optimization, and testing, IEEE Proc. (F), 134, 1, February 1987.
16. Hashlamoon, W.A. and Varshney, P.K., Performance aspects of decentralized detection structures, Proc. of 1989 Int’l. Conf. Of SMC, Cambridge, MA, November 1989.
17. Ward, H.R., Clutter filter performance measures, Proc. of 1980 International Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, April 1980.
18. Wiener, Howard L., Willman, Joseph H., Kullback, Joseph H., and Goodman, Irwin R., Naval Ocean-Surveillance Correlation Handbook 1978, Naval Research Laboratory, 1978.
19. Schweiter, G.A., MOPs for the SDI tracker-correlator, Daniel H. Wagner Associates Interim Memorandum to Naval Research Laboratory, 1978.
20. Mifflin, T., Ocean-surveillance tracker-correlator measures of performance, Naval Research Laboratory Internal Memorandum, 1986.
21. Askin, K., SDI-BM tracker/correlator measures of performance, Integrated Warfare Branch Information Technology Division, April 4, 1989.
22. Belkin, B., Proposed operational measures of performance, Daniel H. Wagner Associates Internal Memorandum, August 8, 1988.
23. Anon, Target recognizer definitions and performance measures, prepared under the auspices of the Automatic Target Recognizer Working Group Data Collection Guidelines Subcommittee of the Data Base Committee, ATRWG No. 86-001, approved February 1986.