Bringing Instructional Consultation to Scale: Research and Development of IC and IC Teams

Handbook of Research in School Consultation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 203-223

  Rosenfield, Sylvia A ^a   Silva, Arlene ^a   Gravois, Todd A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85150532671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Allen, S. J., & Graden, J. L. (2002). Best practices in collaborative problem solving for intervention design. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology–IV (pp. 565–582). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
2. Anton-LaHart, J., & Rosenfield S. (2004). A survey of preservice consultation training in school psychology programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 15, 41–62.
3. Benn, A., & Rosenfield S. (in press). Analysis of instructional consultants’ questions and alternatives to questions during the problem identification interviews. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation.
4. Bergan, J. R., & Tombari, M. L. (1976). Consultant skill and efficiency and the implementation of outcomes of consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 14, 3–14.
5. Burns, M. K. (2004). Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 167–175.
6. Cleven, C. A., & Gutkin, T. B. (1988). Cognitive modeling of consultation processes: A means for improving consultees’ problem definition skills. Journal of School Psychology, 26, 370–389.
7. Coffey, M. (2001). Instructional consultation teams: Baltimore City Public Schools and Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams 2000–2001 end of year progress report (Tech. Rep. No. 9). College Park: University of Maryland, Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
8. Coffey, M. (2002). Instructional consultation teams: Baltimore City Public Schools and Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams 2001–2002 end of year progress report (Tech. Rep. No. 11). College Park: University of Maryland, Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
9. Coffey, M., Rosenfield S., & Smith, J. (2003). Instructional consultation teams: Baltimore City Public Schools and Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams 2000–2001 end of year progress report (Tech. Rep. No. 12). College Park: University of Maryland, Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
10. Cooke, N. L., & Reichard, S. M. (1996). The effects of different interspersal drill ratios on acquisition and generalization of multiplication and division facts. Education and Treatment of Children, 19, 124–142.
11. Costas, L., Rosenfield S., & Gravois, T. A., (2003, August). Impact of instructional consultation on teacher satisfaction and skill development. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
12. Coulter, W. A., & Coulter, E. M. (1990). Curriculum-based assessment for instructional design. Unpublished training material. (Available from Directions and Resources, P.O. Box 57113, New Orleans, LA 70157.)
13. Deno, S. L. (2002). Problem solving as “best practice.” In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.) Best practices in school psychology–IV (pp. 37–55). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
14. Flugum, K. R., & Reschly, D. J. (1994). Prereferral interventions: Quality indices and outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 32, 1–14
15. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1986). Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53, 199–208.
16. Fudell, R. (1992). Level of implementation of teacher support teams and teachers’ attitudes toward special needs students. Dissertation Abstracts International, 53 (5), 1399A. (UMI No. AAC-9227463)
17. Fullan, M. G., & Hargreaves, A. (1991). What’s worth fighting for? Working together for your school. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
18. Gickling, E. E., & Havertape, J. F. (1981). Curriculum-based assessment. In J. A. Tucker (Ed.), Non-test based assessment (pp. 189–410). Minneapolis: The National School Psychology Inservice Training Network, University of Minnesota.
19. Gickling, E. E., & Thompson, V. P. (1985). A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children, 52, 205–218.
20. Gravois, T. A. (2004a). Instructional Consultation Team Consortium: Eastern Shore IC Team Consortium phases1 and2 progress report, July 1, 2003–June 30, 2004 (Tech. Rep. No. 13). College Park: University of Maryland, Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
21. Gravois, T. A. (2004b). Instructional Consultation Team Consortium: Western Maryland IC Team Consortium phases 1 progress report, July 1, 2003–June 30, 2004 (Tech. Rep. No. 14). College Park: University of Maryland, Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
22. Gravois, T. A, Fudell, R., & Rosenfield S. (1998). The instructional consultation team level of implementation scale-revised. Unpublished manuscript.
23. Gravois, T. A., & Gickling, E. E. (2002). Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In A. Thomas and J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology–IV (pp. 885–898). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
24. Gravois, T. A., Knotek, S., & Babinski, L. (2002). Educating practitioners as instructional consultants: Development and implementation of the IC Team Consortium. Journal Educational and Psychological Consultation,13, 113–132.
25. Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfield S. (2002). A multi-dimensional framework for the evaluation of instructional consultation teams. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 5–29.
26. Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfield S. (2006). Impact of instructional consultation teams on the disproportionate referral and placement of minority students in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 42–52.
27. Gravois, T. A., Rosenfield S. A., & Gickling, E. (2002). Instructional consultation teams training manual. College Park, MD: Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
28. Gravois, T. A., Rosenfield S., & Vail, P. L. (1999). Achieving effective and inclusive school settings: A guide for professional development. Special Services in the Schools, 15, 145–170. (Copublished simultaneously in S. I. Pfeiffer & L. A. Reddy, Eds., Inclusion practices with special needs students: Theory, research, and application, pp. 145–170. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press)
29. Gravois, T. A., Vail, P. L., & Nelson, D. (2004). Instructional consultation team coaching manual. College Park, MD: Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
30. Gutkin, T. B. (1999). Collaborative versus directive/prescriptive/expert school-based consultation: Reviewing a false dichotomy. Journal of School Psychology, 37, 161–190.
31. Harris, A. J. (1979). The effective teacher of reading, revisited. The Reading Teacher, 33, 135–140.
32. Hughes, J., Erchul, W., Yoon, J., Jackson, T., & Henington, C. (1997). Consultant use of questions and its relationship to consultee evaluation of effectiveness. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 281–298.
33. Jones, G. (1999). Validation ofa simulation to evaluate instructional consultation problem identification skill competence. Dissertation Abstracts International, 60 (12A), 4317.
34. Knotek, S. E., Rosenfield S. A., Gravois, T. A., & Babinski, L. M. (2003). The process of fostering consultee development during instructional consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 303–329.
35. Kratochwill, T. R., Elliott, S. N., & Callan-Stoiber, K. (2002). Best practices in collaborative problem solving for intervention design. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology–IV (pp. 583–608). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
36. Kuralt, S. K. (1990). Collaboration in the classroom: Implementing consultation-based prereferral intervention as the service delivery system of five elementary multidisciplinary teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York, NY.
37. LaFleur, A., & Rosenfield S. (2005, April). Student goal attainment and implementation integrity in instructional consultation teams. Poster presented at the National Association of School Psychologists Meeting, Atlanta.
38. Lambert, N. M. (2004). Consultee-centered consultation: An international perspective on goals, process, and theory. In N. M. Lambert, I. Hylander, & J. H. Sandoval (Eds.), Consultee-centered consultation: Improving the quality of professional services in schools and community organizations (pp. 3–19). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Lambert, N. M., Hylander, I., & Sandoval, J. H. (Eds.). (2004). Consultee-centered consultation: Improving the quality of professional services in schools and community organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Levinsohn, M. R. (2000). Evaluating instructional consultation teams for student reading achievement and special education outcomes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
41. McKenna, S. A., Rosenfield S., & Gravois, T. A. (2005, August). Validity of the Instructional Consultation Teams (IC-Teams) Level of Implementation Scale-Revised (LOI-R). Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
42. Neef, N. A., Iwata, B. A., & Page, T. J. (1980). The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement on spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 153–158.
43. Nezu, A. M., & Nezu, C. M. (Eds.). (1989). Clinical decision making in behavior therapy: A problem-solving perspective. Champaign, IL: Research Press Company.
44. Partanen, P., & Wistrom, C. (2004). Promoting student learning by consultee-centered consultation with a Vygotskian framework. In N. M. Lambert, I. Hylander, & J. H. Sandoval (Eds.), Consultee-centered consultation: Improving the quality of professional services in schools and community organizations (pp. 313–322). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Pounder, D. G. (1998). Restructuring schools for collaboration. Albany: State University of New York Press.
46. Pugach, M. C., & Johnson, L. J. (1995). Collaborative practitioners, collaborative schools. Denver, CO: Love.
47. Reynolds, A. J. (1998). Confirmatory program evaluation: A method for strengthening causal inference. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 203–221.
48. Roberts, M. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Effects of instructional ratios on students’ reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 73–91.
49. Rosenfield S. (1987). Instructional consultation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Rosenfield S. (1992). Developing school-based consultation teams: A design for organizational change. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 27–46.
51. Rosenfield S. (2000). Crafting usable knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1347–1355.
52. Rosenfield S. (2002a). Bestpracticesininstructionalconsultation. In A. Thomas& J. Grimes (Eds.), Bestpractices in school psychology–IV (pp. 609–623). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
53. Rosenfield S. (2002b). Developing instructional consultants: From novice to competent to expert. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 13, 97–111.
54. Rosenfield S. (2004). Consultation as dialogue: The right words at the right time. In N. M. Lambert, I. Hylander, & J. H. Sandoval (Eds.), Consultee-centered consultation: Improving the quality of professional services in schools and community organizations (pp. 337–347). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Rosenfield S. A., & Gravois, T. A. (1996). Instructional consultation teams: Collaborating for change. New York: Guilford.
56. Rosenfield S., & Rubinson, F. (1985). Introducing curriculum-based assessment through consultation. Exceptional Children, 52, 282–287.
57. Sarason, S. B. (1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
58. Schulte, A. C., & Osborne, S. S. (2003). When assumptive worlds collide: A review of definitions of collaboration in consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 109–139.
59. Shinn, M. R., Rosenfield S., & Knutson, N. (1989). Curriculum-based assessment: A comparison of models. School Psychology Review, 18, 299–316.
60. Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Children’s thinking (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
61. Silva, A. E. (2005). English Language Learner special education referral and placement outcomes in instructional consultation teams schools. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
62. Stoner, G., & Green, S. K. (1992). Reconsidering the scientist-practitioner model for school psychology practice. School Psychology Review, 21, 155–166.
63. Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443–462.
64. Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1979). The ecology of program research and evaluation:A model of evaluation succession. In L. B. Sechrest (Ed.), Evaluation studies review annual (Vol. 4, pp. 39–60). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
65. Tombari, M. L., & Bergan, J. R. (1978). Consultant cues and teacher verbalizations, judgments, and expectancies concerning children’s adjustment problems. Journal of School Psychology, 16, 212–219.
66. Udvari-Solner, A., & Thousand, J. S. (1996). Creatinga responsive curriculum for inclusive schools. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 182–193.
67. Vail, P. L., Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfield S. (1998). IC-team facilitator training manual. College Park, MD: Laboratory for Instructional Consultation Teams.
68. Vygotsky, L. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Vygotsky, L. V. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
70. Weiner, R. K. (2002). A comparison of IC-teams to IEP teams on special education referral and eligibility rates of minority students. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Maryland, College Park.
71. White, L. J., Summerlin, M. L., Loos, V. E., & Epstein, E. S. (1992). School and family consultation: A language-systems approach. In M. Fine & C. Carlson (Eds.), The handbook of family-school intervention: A systems perspective (pp. 347–362). Boston: Allyn& Bacon.
72. Ysseldyke, J. E., & Christenson, S. L. (1993). The instructional environment system (TIES)–II. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
73. Ysseldyke, J., Burns, M., Dawson, P., Kelly, B., Morrison, D., Ortiz, S., et al. (2006). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice III. Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.