Word-sense disambiguation using decomposable models

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1994-June, Issue , 1994, Pages 139-146

  Bruce, Rebecca ^a   Wiebe, Janyce ^a  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

CASE-STUDIES; CONTEXTUAL FEATURE; DECOMPOSABLE MODELS; JOINT DISTRIBUTIONS; PERFORMANCE; PROBABILISTIC CLASSIFIERS; PROBABILISTIC MODELS; VARIABLE INTERACTION; WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY;

EID: 85149134501     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Baglivo, J., Olivier, D., and Pagano, M. (1992). Methods for Exact Goodness-of-Fit Tests. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 87, No. 418, June 1992.
2. Bishop, Y. M.; Fienberg, S.; and Holland, P (1975). Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
3. Black, Ezra (1988). An Experiment in Computational Discrimination of English Word Senses. IBM Journal of Research and Development, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 185-194.
4. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Monterey, CA: Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software.
5. Brown, P., Delia Pietra, S., Delia Pietra, V., and Mercer, R. (1991). Word Sense Disambiguation Using Statistical Methods. Proceedings ofthe 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-91), pp. 264-304.
6. Cowie, J., Guthrie, J., and Guthrie, L. (1992). Lexical Disambiguation and Simulating Annealing. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92). pp 359-365.
7. Dagan, I., Itai, A., and Schwall, U. (1991). Two Languages Are More Informative Than One. Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-91), pp. 130-137.
8. Darroch, J., Lauritzen, S., and Speed, T. (1980). Markov Fields and Log-Linear Interaction Models for Contingency Tables. The Annals of Statistics, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 522-539.
9. Dunning, Ted (1993). Accurate Methods for the Statistics of Surprise and Coincidence. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp.61-74.
10. Gale, W., Church, K., and Yarowsky, D. (1992a). A Method for Disambiguating Word Senses in a Large Corpus. AT&T Bell Laboratories Statistical Research Report No. 104.
11. Gale, W., Church, K. and Yarowsky, D. (1992b). Estimating Upper and Lower Bounds on the Performance of Word-Sense Disambiguation Programs. Proceedings ofthe 30th Annual Meeting of the ACL, 1992.
12. Havranek, Tomas (1984). A Procedure for Model Search in Multidimensional Contingency Tables. Biometrics, 40, pp.95-100.
13. Hearst, Marti (1991). Toward Noun Homonym Disambiguation-Using Local Context in Large Text Corpora. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the UW Centre for the New OED and Text Research Using Corpora, pp. 1-22.
14. Jorgensen, Julia (1990). The Psychological Reality of Word Senses. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Vol 19, pp. 167-190.
15. Kelly, E and P. Stone (1979). Computer Recognition of English Word Senses, Vol. 3 of North Holland Linguistics Series, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16. Kiiveri, H., Speed, T., and Carlin, J. (1984). Recursive Causal Models. Journal Austral. Math. Soc. (Series A), 36, pp. 30-52.
17. Kilgarriff, Adam (1993). Dictionary Word Sense Distinctions: An Enquiry Into Their Nature. Computers and the Humanities, 26, pp.365-387.
18. Koehler, K. (1986). Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Log-Linear Models in Sparse Contingency Tables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 81, No. 394, June 1986.
19. Lau, R., Rosenfeld, R., and Roukos, S. (1993a). Trigger-Based Language Models: a Maximum Entropy Approach. Proceedings of ICASSP-93. April 1993.
20. Lau, R., Rosenfeld, R., and Roukos, S. (1993b). Adaptive Language Modeling Using the Maximum Entropy Principle. Proc. ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop. March 1993.
21. Pearl, Judea (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning In Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. San Mateo, Ca.: Morgan Kaufmann.
22. Pederson, S. and Johnson, M. (1990). Estimating Model Discrepancy. Technometrics, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 305-314.
23. Procter, Paul et al. (1978). Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English.
24. Ratnaparkhi, A. and Roukos, S. (1994). A Maximum Entropy Model for Prepositional Phrase Attachment. Proc. ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop. March 1994.
25. Rosenfeld, R. (1994). A Hybrid Approach to Adaptive Statistical Language Modeling. Proc. ARPA Human Language Technology Workshop. March 1994.
26. Schutze, Hinrich (1992). Word Space. In S.J. Hanson, J.D. Cowan, and C.L. Giles (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 5, San Mateo, Ca.: Morgan Kaufmann.
27. Wermuth, N. and Lauritzen, S. (1983). Graphical and recursive models for contingency tables. Biometrika, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 537-52.
28. Wilks, Y., Fass, D., Guo, C, McDonald, J., Plate, T., and Slator, B. (1990). Providing Machine Tractable Dictionary Tools. Computers and Translation 2. Also to appear in Theoretical and Computational Issues in Lexical Semantics (TCILS). Edited by James Pustejovsky. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
29. Yarowsky, David (1992). Word-Sense Disambiguating Using Statistical Models of Roget's Categories Trained on Large Corpora. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-92).
30. Yarowsky, David (1993). One Sense Per Collocation. Proceedings of the Speech and Natural Language ARPA Workshop, March 1993, Princeton, NJ.
31. Zernik, Uri (1990). Tagging Word Senses In Corpus: The Needle in the Haystack Revisited. Technical Report 90CRD198, GE Research and Development Center.