Analysis system of speech acts and discourse structures using maximum entropy model

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1999-June, Issue , 1999, Pages 230-237

  Choi, Won Seug ^a   Cho, Jeong Mi ^a   Seo, Jungyun ^a  

^a Sogang University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

ANALYSIS STRUCTURE; ANALYSIS SYSTEM; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE; DISCOURSE STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM ENTROPY MODELS; PROBABILISTICS; SPEECH ACT ANALYSIS; SPEECH ACTS; STATISTICAL DIALOGUE ANALYSIS MODEL; STRUCTURAL INFORMATION;

ENTROPY;

EID: 85149121216     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Andernach, T. 1996. A Machine Learning Approach to the Classification of Dialogue Utterances. Proceedings ofNeMLaP-2.
2. Berger, Adam L., Stephen A. Della Pietra, and Vincent J. Della Pietra. 1996. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Natural Language Processing. Computational Linguistics, 22(1):39-71.
3. Caberry, Sandra. 1989. A Pragmatics-Based Approach to Ellipsis Resolution. Computational Linguistics, 15(2):75-96.
4. Carniak, Eugene. 1993. Statistical Language Learning. A Bradford Book, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
5. Collins, M. J. 1996. A New Statistical Parser Based on Bigram Lexical Dependencies. Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 184-191.
6. Grosz, Barbara J. and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, Intentions, and the Structure of Discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12(3):175-204.
7. Hinkelman, E. A. 1990. Linguistic and Pragmatic Constraints on Utterance Interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
8. Hinkelman, E. A. and J. F. Allen. 1989. Two Constraints on Speech Act Ambiguity. Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 212-219.
9. Kim, Chang-Hyun, Jae-Hoon Kim, Jungyun Seo, and Gil Chang Kim. 1994. A Right-to-Left Chart Parsing for Dependency Grammar using Headable Path. Proceeding of the 1994 International Conference on Computer Processing of Oriental Languages (ICCPOL), pages 175-180.
10. Lambert, Lynn. 1993. Recognizing Complex Discourse Acts: A Tripartite Plan-Based Model of Dialogue. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.
11. Lambert, Lynn and Sandra Caberry. 1991. A Tripartite Plan-based Model of Dialogue. Proceedings ofACL, pages 47-54.
12. Lee, Jae-won, Jungyun Seo, Gil Chang Kim. 1997. A Dialogue Analysis Model With Statistical Speech Act Processing For Dialogue Machine Translation. Proceedings of Spoken Language Translation (Workshop in conjunction with (E)ACL'97), pages 10-15.
13. Lee, Hyunjung, Jae-Won Lee and Jungyun Seo. 1998. Speech Act Analysis Model of Korean Utterances for Automatic Dialog Translation. Journal of Korea Information Science Society (B): Software andApplications, 25(10):1443-1552 (In Korean).
14. Litman, Diane J. and James F. Allen. 1987. A Plan Recognition Model for Subdialogues in Conversations. Cognitive Science, pages 163-200.
15. Nagata, M. and T. Morimoto. 1994a. First steps toward statistical modeling of dialogue to predict the speech act type of the next utterance. Speech Communication, 15: 193-203.
16. Nagata, M. and T. Morimoto. 1994b. An information-theoretic model of discourse for next utterance type prediction. Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan, 35(6):1050-1061.
17. Reithinger, N. and M. Klesen. 1997. Dialogue act classification using language models. Proceedings ofEuroSpeech-97, pages 2235-2238.
18. Reynar, J. C. and A. Ratnaparkhi. 1997. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Identifying Sentence Boundaries. In Proceeding of the Fifth Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 16-19.
19. Ristad, E. 1996. Maximum Entropy Modeling Toolkit. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, Princeton University.
20. Samuel, Ken, Sandra Caberry, and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1998. Computing Dialogue Acts from Features with Transformation-Based Learning. Applying Machine Learning to Discourse Processing: Papers from the 1998 AAAI Spring Symposium. Stanford, California. Pages 90-97.
21. Walker, Marilyn A. 1996. Limited Attention and Discourse Structure. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):255-264.