Linguistic structure as composition and perturbation

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1996-June, Issue , 1996, Pages 335-341

  de Marcken, Carl ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEARNING LANGUAGES; LINGUISTIC STRUCTURE; POWER; SPEECH SIGNALS; TEXT COMPRESSIONS; TEXT SEGMENTATION;

EID: 85149107548     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Leonard E. Baum, Ted Petrie, George Soules, and Norman Weiss. 1970. A maximization technique occuring in the statisticalanalysis of probabaJistic functions in markov chains. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41:164-171.
2. Glenn Carroll and Eugene Charniak. 1992. Learning probaballstic dependency grammars from labelled text. In Working Notes, Fall Symposium Series, AAAL pages 25-31.
3. Timothy Andrew Cartwright and Michael R. Brent. 1994. Segmenting speech without a lexicon: Evidence for a bootstrapping model of lexical acquisition. In Proc. of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
4. Stanley F. Chen. 1995. Bayesian grammar induction for language modeling. In Proe. $2nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 228-235, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
5. Noam A. Chomsky. 1955. The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory. Plenum Press, New York.
6. Carl de Marcken. 1995a. Lexical heads, phrase structure and the induction of grammar. In Third Workshop on Very Large Corpora, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
7. Carl de Marcken. 1995b. The unsupervised acquisition of a lexicon from continuous speech. Memo A.I. Memo 1558, MIT Artificial Intelligence Lab., Cambridge, Massachusetts.
8. Sabine Deligne and Frederic Bimbot. 1995. Language modeling by variable length sequences: Theoretical formulation and evaluation of multigrams. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Speech and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 169-172.
9. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Liard, and D. B. Rubin. 1977. Maximum lildihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B(39):I-38.
10. T. Mark Ellison. 1992. The Machine Learning of Phonological Structure. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Australia.
11. W. N. Francis and H. Kucera. 1982. Frequency analysis of English usage: lexicon and grammar. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
12. Zellig Harris. 1968. Mathematical Structure of Language. Wiley, New York.
13. Donald Cort Olivier. 1968. Stochastic Grammars and Language Acquisition Mechanisms. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
14. Fernando Pereira and Yves Schabes. 1992. Inside-outside reestimation from partially bracketed corpora. In Proc. $9th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 128-135, Berkeley, California.
15. Jorma Rissanen. 1978. Modeling by shortest data description. Automatica, 14:465-471.
16. Jorma Rissanen. 1989. Stochastic Complexity in StatisticalInquiry. World Scientific,Singapore.
17. R. J. Solomonoff. 1960. The mechanization of linguistic learning. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics, pages 180-193.
18. Andreas Stolcke. 1994. Bayesian Learning of Probabalistic Language Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
19. J. Gerald Wolff. 1982. Language acquisition, data compression and generalization. Language and Communication, 2(1):57-89.
20. J. Ziv and A. Lempel. 1978. Compression of individual sequences by variable rate coding. Iggg Transactions on Information Theory, 24:530-538.