Tracking initiative in collaborative dialogue interactions

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 1997-July, Issue , 1997, Pages 262-270

  Chu Carroll, Jennifer ^a   Brown, Michael K ^a  

^a LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

'CURRENT; PERCENTAGE POINTS; SYSTEM PREDICTION;

EID: 85149106777     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Allen, James. 1991. Discourse structure in the TRAINS project. In Darpa Speech and Natural Language Workshop.
2. Carletta, Jean. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. ComputationaILinguistics, 22:249-254.
3. Chu-Carroll, Jennifer and Michael K. Brown. 1997. Initiative in collaborative interactions - - its cues and effects. In WorkingNotes of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction, pages 16-22.
4. Chu-Carroll, Jennifer and Sandra Carberry. 1994. A plan-based model for response generation in collaborative task-oriented dialogues. In Proceedings of the TwelfthNational Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 799-805.
5. Chu-Carroll, Jennifer and Sandra Carberry. 1995. Response generation in collaborative negotiation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Associationfor Computational Linguistics, pages 136-143.
6. Cochran, W. G. 1950. The comparison of percentages in matched samples. Biometrika, 37:256-266.
7. Gordon, Jean and Edward H. Shortliffe. 1984. The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. In Bruce Buchanan and Edward Shortliffe, editors, Rule-Based Expert Systems: The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project. Addison-Wesley, chapter 13, pages 272-292.
8. Gross, Derek, James F. Allen, and David R. Tranm. 1993. The TRAINS 91 dialogues. Technical Report TN92-1, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
9. Grove, William M., Nancy C. Andreasen, Patricia McDonald-Scott, Martin B. Keller, and Robert W. Shapiro. 1981. Reliability studies of psychiatric diagnosis. Archives of General Psychiatry., 38:408-413,
10. Guinn, Curry I. 1996. Mechanisms for mixed-initiative)',m~nJ'c,mputer col!~_b,~_raOvedi_scourse. In Proceed-i;;g~of tiu."34th Anl;ual Mccti,.d of the,ts~,,ciati~,.,for Computational Linguistics, pages 278-285.
11. Heeman, Peter A. and James F. Allen. 1995. The TRAINS 93 dialogues. Technical Report TN94-2, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
12. Jordan, Pamela W. and Barbara Di Eugenio. 1997. Control and initiative in collaborative problem solving dialogues. In WorkingNotes of the AAA1-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Modelsfor Mixed Initiative Interaction, pages 81-84.
13. Kitano, Hiroaki and Carol Van Ess-Dykema. 1991. Toward a plan-based understanding model for mixed-initiative dialogues. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 25-32.
14. Lambert, Lynn and Sandra Carberry. 1991. A tripartite plan-based model of dialogue. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 47-54.
15. Litman, Diane and James Allen. 1987. A plan recognition model for subdialogues in conversation. Cognitive Science, 11:163-200.
16. Map Task Dialogues. 1996. Transcripts of DCIEM Sleep Deprivation Study, conducted by Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Canada, and Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh and University of Glasgow, UK. Distrubuted by HCRC and LDC.
17. Novick, David G. 1988. ControlofMixed-lnitiative Discourse Through Meta-Locutionary Acts: A Computational Model. Ph.D. thesis, University of Oregon.
18. Novick, David G. and Stephen Sutton. 1997. What is mixed-initiative interaction? In Working Notes of the AAAI-97 Spring Symposium on Computational Models for Mixed Initiative Interaction, pages 114-116.
19. Pearl, Judea. 1990, Bayesian and belief-fuctions formalisms for evidential reasoning: A conceptual analysis. In Glenn Shafer and Judea Pearl, editors, Readings in Uncertain Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, pages 540-574.
20. Rmnshaw, Lance A. 1991. A three-level model for plan exploration. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 36-46.
21. Shafer, Glenn. 1976. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press.
22. Siegel, Sidney. and N. John. Castellan, Jr. 1988. Nonparametric Statisticsfor the Behavioral Sciences. Mc-Graw Hill.
23. Smith, Ronnie W. and D. Richard Hipp. 1994. Spoken Natural Language Dialog Systems - A Practical Approach. Oxford University Press.
24. SRI Transcripts. 1992. Transcripts derived from audiotape conversations made at SRI International, Menlo Park, CA. Prepared by Jacqueline Kowtko under the direction of Patti Price.
25. Switchboard Credit Card Corpus. 1992. Transcripts of telephone conversations on the topic of credit card use, collected at Texas Instruments. Produced by NIST, available through LDC.
26. Walker, Marilyn and Steve Whittaker. 1990. Mixed initiative in dialogue: An investigation into discourse segmentation. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 70-78.
27. Walker, Marilyn A. 1992. Redundancy in collaborative dialogue. In Proceedingsofthe 15th International Conference on ComputationalLinguistics, pages 345-351.
28. Whittaker, Steve and Phil Stenton. 1988. Cues and control in expert-client dialogues. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 123-130.