Multiscale Vegetation Data for the Mountains of Southern California: Spatial and Categorical Resolution

Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 141-168

  Franklin, Janet ^a   Woodcock, Curtis E ^b  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85148781308     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/9780203740170-8     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Allen, T. F. H. and Hoekstra, T. W., The confusion between scale-defined levels and conventional levels of organization in ecology, J. Veg. Sci., 1,5, 1990
2. Allen, T. H. F. and Starr, T. B., Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1982, 253
3. Astle, W. L., Webster, R., and Lawrance, C. J., Land classification for management planning in the Luangwa Valley of Zambia, J. Applied EcoL, 6, 143, 1969
4. Bailey, R. G., Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multi-scale ecosystem mapping, Landscape Urban Plan., 14, 313, 1987
5. Bolstad, P. V. and Lillesand, T. M., Improved classification of forest vegetation in northern Wisconsin through a rule-based combination of soils, terrain, and Landsat Thematic Mapper data, Forest Sci., 38, 5, 1992
6. Christian, C. S., The concept of land units and land systems, Proc. 9th Pacific Sci. Congr., 20, 74, 1958
7. Christian, Cẻ S. and Stewart, G. A., Methodology of integrated surveys, in Aerial Surveys and Integrated Studies. Proc. Toulouse Confi, UNESCO, Paris, 1968, 233
8. Cibula, W. G. and Nyquist, M. O., Use of topographic and climatological models in a geographic database to improve Landsat MSS classification for Olympic National Forest, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 53, 67, 1987
9. Collins, J., Woodcock, C. E., and Jupp, D. L. B., Spatial dependence and nested hierarchical scene models, in ASPRS/ACSM Annu. Conv. Expo. Tech. Papers, Charlotte, CA, February 27-March 2 1995, ACSM/ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, 1995, 535
10. Congalton, R. G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing Environ., 37, 35, 1991
11. Cousins, S. H., Hierarchy in ecology: its relevance to landscape ecology and geographic information systems, in Landscape Ecology and Geographic Information Systems, Haines-Young, R., Green, D. R., and Cousins, S., Eds., Taylor and Francis, New York, 1993, 75
12. Davis, F. W·, Mapping and monitoring teưestrial biodiversity using geographic information systems, in Biodiversity and Terrestrial Ecosystems, Peng, C.-I. and Chou, C. H., Eds., Academia Sinica Monograph Series No. 14, Taipei, 1994, 461
13. Davis, F. W. and Dozier, J., Information analysis of a spatial database for ecological land classification, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 56, 605, 1990
14. Davis, F. W·, Stine, P. A., and Stoms, D. M., Distribution and conservation status of coastal sage scrub in southwestern California, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 743, 1994
15. deHoll, F. G., Land Management Plan: Palomar Mountain Planning Unit, USDA Forest Service, Cleveland National Forest, Rancho Bernardo, CA, 1976, 21pp
16. Dubayah, R. C., Modeling a solar radiation topoclimatology for the Rio Grande River Basin, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 627, 1994
17. Ehleringer, J. R. and Field, C. B., Eds., Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe, Academic Press, San Diego, 1993, 388pp
18. Forest Service, R., 5, F.A User’s Guide, USDA Forest Service Region 5 Remote Sensing Laboratory, Sacramento, CA, 1994
19. Forman, R. T. T. and Godron, M., Landscape Ecology, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1986, 619pp
20. Franklin, J., Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modeling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 19, 474, 1995
21. Franklin, J., Davis, F. W., and Lefebure, P., Thematic Mapper analysis of tree cover in semiarid woodlands using a model of canopy shadowing, Remote Sensing Environ., 36,189,1991
22. Franklin, J., Logan, T., Woodcock, C. E., and Strahler, A. H., Coniferous forest classification and inventory using Landsat and digital terrain data, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, GE-24, 139, 1986
23. Franklin, J. F., Why link species conservation, environmental protection, and resource management?, in Linking Species and Ecosystems, Jones, C. G. and Lawton, J. H., Eds., Chapman and Hall, New York, 1995, 326
24. Goodchild, M. F., Geographical data modeling, Comp. Geosci., 18, 401, 1992
25. Goodchild, M. F., Integrating GIS and remote sensing for vegetation analysis and modeling: methodological issues, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 615, 1994
26. Gopal, S. and Woodcock, C. E., Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 60, 181, 1994
27. Gordon, H. and White, T. C, Ecological Guide to Southern California Chaparral Plant Series, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Cleveland National Forest, Ranch Bernardo, CA, 1994, 162 pp
28. Graetz, R. D., Remote sensing of teưestrial ecosystem structure: an ecologist’s pragmatic view, in Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning, Hobbs, R. J. and Mooney, H. A., Eds., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990, 5
29. Haines-Young, R., Green, D. R,. and Cousins, S., Eds., Landscape Ecology and Geographic Information Systems, Taylor and Francis, New York, 1993, 288pp
30. Hobbs, R. J. and Mooney, H. A., Eds., Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1990
31. Hoffer, R. M., Challenges in developing and applying remote sensing to ecosystem management, in Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management, Sample, V. A., Ed., Island Press, Washington, DC, 1994, 25
32. Hoffer, R. M. and staff, Natural Resource Mapping in Mountainous Terrain By Computer Analysis of ERTS-1 Satellite Data, Agricultural Experimental Station Research Bulletin 919, and LARS Contract Report 061575, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN, 1975, 124pp
33. Holland, R. F., Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California, The Resources Agency, Nongame Heritage Program, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, CA, 1986, 156pp
34. Huete, A. R., Separation of soil-plant spectral mixtures by factor analysis, Remote Sensing Environ., 19, 237, 1986
35. Hutchinson, C. F., Techniques for combining Landsat and ancillary data for digital classification improvement, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 48, 123, 1982
36. Jupp, D. L. B·, Strahler, A. H., and Woodcock, C. E., Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images I. Basic theory, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, 26, 463, 1988
37. Lees, B. G., Decision trees, artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms for classification of remotely sensed and ancillary data, 7th Australasian Remote Sensing Conf. Proc., Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Association Australia Ltd., Floreat, Western Australia, 51, 1994
38. Li, X. and Strahler, A. H., Geometric-optical modeling of a conifer forest canopy, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing, GE-23, 705, 1985
39. Lund, H. G., National hierarchical framework of ecological units for ecosystem classification, in Proc. Nat. Workshop: Integrated Ecol. Resour. Inventories, Lund, H. G., Ed., USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 1993, 155
40. MacKenzie, M. D., GIS applications perspective: Remote sensing and GIS as a bridge between ecologists and resource managers in the Northern Lake States, in Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management, Sample, V. A., Ed., Island Press, Washington, DC, 1992, 265
41. Margules, C. R. and Nicholls, A. O., Assessing the conservation value of remnant habitat ‘islands’: mallee patches on the Western Eyre Peninsula, South Australia, in Nature Conservation: The Role of Remnant of Natural Vegetation, Saunders, D. A., Arnold, G. W·, Burbidge, A. A., and Hopkins, A. J. M., Eds., Suưey Beatty and Sons Pty. Ld., Canbeưa, 1987, 89
42. Maytas, W. J. and Parker, I., CALVEG Mosaic of Existing Vegetation in California, Regional Ecology Group, USDA Forest Service, Region 5, 630 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA, 1980, 27pp
43. Meyer, M. and Werth, L., Satellite data: management panacea or potential problem?, J. Forestry, September 1990, 10, 1990
44. Michaelsen, J., Schimel, D., Friedl, M., Davis, F. W., and Dubayah, R. C., Regression tree analysis of satellite and terrain data to guide vegetation sampling and surveys, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 673, 1994
45. Mladenoff, D. J. and Host, G. E., Ecological perspective: cuưent and potential applications of remote sensing and GIS to ecosystem analysis, in Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management, Sample, V. A., Ed., Island Press, Washington, DC, 1994, 218
46. Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B., and Ladson, A. R., Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological and biological applications, Hydrol. Process., 5, 3,1991
47. Naveh, Z. and Lieberman, A., Landscape Ecology: Theory and Applications, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, 360pp
48. O’Neill, R. V., DeAngelis, D. L., Waide, J. B., and Allen, T. H. F,. A Hierarchical Concept of Ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986, 253
49. Perez-Trejo, F., Landscape response units: process-based self-organising systems, in Landscape Ecology and Geographic Information Systems, Haines-Young, R., Green, D. R., and Cousins, S., Eds., Taylor and Francis, New York, 1993, 87
50. Pryde, P. R., Ed., San Deigo: An Introduction to the Region, 3rd ed., Kendall-Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa, 1992, 308pp
51. Sabol, D. E., Adams, J. B., and Smith, M. O., Quantitative sub-pixel spectral detection of targets in multispectral images, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 2659, 1992
52. Sample, V. A., Ed., Remote Sensing and GIS in Ecosystem Management, Island Press, Washington, DC, 1994, 369pp
53. Scott, J. M·, Davis, F., Csuti, B., Noss, R., Butterfield, B., Groves, C., Anderson, H., Caicco, S., D’Erchia, F., Edwards, T. C., Jr., Ulliman, J., and Wright, R. G., Gap analysis: a geographical approach to protection of biological diversity, Wildlife Monogr., 123, 1, 1993
54. Shandley, J. P., Franklin, J., and White, T,. Testing the Woodcock-Harward image segmentation algorithm in an area of southern California chaparral and woodland vegetation, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 17, 983, 1996
55. Smith, M. Oẻ, Ustin, S. L., Adams, J. B., and Gillespie, A. R., Vegetation in deserts: I. A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images, Remote Sensing Environ., 31, 1, 1990
56. Spies, T. A. and Barnes, B. V., A multifactor ecological classification of the northern hardwood and conifer ecosystems of Sylvania Recreation Area, Upper Peninsula, Michigan, Canadian J. Forest Res., 15, 949, 1985
57. Stoms, D. M·, Validating large-area land cover databases with maplets, GeoCarto International, 11, 87, 1996
58. Strahler, A. H., The use of prior probabilities in maximum likelihood classification of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing Environ., 10, 135, 1980
59. Strahler, A. H., Stratification of natural vegetation for forest and rangeland inventory using Landsat digital imagery and collateral data, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 2, 15, 1981
60. Strahler, A. H., Woodcock, C. E., and Smith, J. A., On the nature of models in remote sensing, Remote Sensing Environ., 20, 121, 1986
61. Troll, G,. Landscape ecology (geo-ecology) and bio-ceonology — a terminology study, Geoforum, 8, 43, 1971
62. Trotter, C. M., Remotely-sensed data as an information source for geographical information systems in natural resource management: a review, Int. J. Geogr. Info. Sys., 5, 225,1991
63. Turner, M. G. and Gardner, R.H., Eds., Quantitative Methods in Landscape Ecology, Springer- Verlag, New York, 1991
64. Urban, D. L., O’Neill, R. V., and Shugart, H. H., Jr., Landscape ecology, BioScience, 37,119, 1987
65. Walsh, S. J. and Davis, F. W., Applications of remote sensing and geographic information systems in vegetation science: introduction, J. Veg. Sci., 5, 610, 1994
66. White, J. D·, Kroh, G. C, and Pinder, J. E., Ill, Forest mapping at Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, using Landsat TM data and a geographical information system, Photogr. Eng. Remote Sensing, 61, 299, 1995
67. Whittaker, R. H., Direct gradient analysis, in Handbook of Vegetation Science 5: Ordination and Classification of Communities, Whittaker, R. H., Ed., Junk, The Hague, 1973, 9
68. Wood, C. M·, Palomar, from Teepee to Telescope, Frye and Smith, Ltd., San Diego, 1937, 149
69. Woodcock, C. D., Collins, J., Gopal, S., Jakabhazy, V. D., Li, X., Macomber, S., Ryherd, S., Harward, V. J., Levitan, J., Wu, Y., and Warbington, R., Mapping forest vegetation using Landsat TM imagery and a canopy reflectance model, Remote Sensing Environ., 50, 240, 1994a
70. Woodcock, C. E., Collins, J. B., Jakabhazy, V. D., Li, X., and Macomber, S., Inversion of the Li-Strahler model for mapping forest vegetation: what works and what doesn’t, in ACSM/ASPRS Atinu. Conv. Expo. Tech. Papers, Charlotte, NC, February 27-March 2, 1995, ACSM/ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, 1995, 299
71. Woodcock, C. E. and Gopal, S., Remote sensing of forests: new data layers for GIS, in ACSM/ASPRS Annu. Conv. Expo. Tech.Papers, Charlotte, NC, February 27-March 2, 1995, ACSM/ASPRS, Bethesda, MD, 1995, 420
72. Woodcock, C. W., Gopal, S., Macomber, S., and Jakabhazy, V., Accuracy Assessment of the Vegetation Map of the Plumas National Forest, Boston University Center for Remote Sensing, Boston, 1994b, 18pp
73. Woodcock, C. E. and Harward, V. J., Nested-hierarchical scene models and image segmentation, Int. J. Remote Sensing, 13, 3167, 1992