History of the Community Innovation Survey

Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 60-87

  Arundel, Anthony ^a   Smith, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145641196     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (47)

1. Åkerblom, M. (1996), ‘The second Community Innovation Survey: Preliminary methodo- logical considerations and first draft of revised core questionnaire’, mimeo, 3 September.
2. APSC (Australian Public Service Commission) (2011), State of the Service Report: State of the Service Series 2010–2011, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
3. Archibugi, D., P. Cohendet, A. Kristensen and K.-A. Schaffer (1997), ‘Evaluation of the Community Innovation Survey’, in A. Arundel and R. Garrelfs (eds), Innovation Measurement and Policies, Luxembourg: European Commission, EIMS publication 50, pp. 41–6.
4. Arthur D. Little (1963), Patterns and Problems of Technical Innovation in American Industry, Report c-65344 submitted to the NSF, Washington, DC: NSF.
5. Arundel, A. (2007), ‘Innovation survey indicators: What impact on innovation policy?’, in OECD, Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, Paris: OECD, pp. 49–64.
6. Arundel, A. and C. Bordoy (2005), The Fourth Community Innovation Survey: Final Questionnaire, Supporting Documentation, and the State-of-Art for the Design of the CIS, Final report to Eurostat, Luxembourg: Eurostat, May.
7. Arundel, A. and R. Garrelfs (eds) (1997), Innovation Measurement and Policies, Luxembourg: European Commission, EIMS publication 50.
8. Arundel, A. and H. Hollanders (2011), ‘A taxonomy of innovation: How do public sector agencies innovate? Results of the 2010 European Innobarometer survey of public agen- cies’, Brussels: INNO Metrics, European Commission, http://www.proinnoeurope.eu/sites/default/files/page/11/12/IUS2010_A_taxonomy_of_innovation_How_do_public_sector_ agencies_innovate.pdf, accessed 31 July 2012.
9. Arundel, A., C. Bordoy and A. van Cruysen (2009), Community Innovation Survey 2008: Final Report, report for Eurostat, Luxembourg: Eurostat, 19 March.
10. Arundel, A., C. Bordoy and A. van Cruysen (2010), Community Innovation Survey 2010: Final Report, report for Eurostat, Luxembourg: Eurostat, 24 January.
11. Arundel, A., C. Bordoy, A. van Cruysen and C. Huang (2007), Community Innovation Survey 2006: Final Report, report for Eurostat, Luxembourg: Eurostat, 11 September.
12. Borins, S. (2001), The Challenge of Innovating in Government, Innovation in Management Series, Arlington, VA: PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
13. Bugge, M., P.S. Mortensen and C. Bloch (2011), Measuring Public Innovation in Nordic Countries: Report on the Nordic Pilot Studies, Analyses of Methodology and Results, Oslo: MEPIN, NIFU.
14. Carter, C.F. and B.R. Williams (1957), Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Collins, D. (2003), ‘Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods’, Quality of Life Research, 12, 229–38.
16. David, P.A. (2011), ‘Zvi Griliches and the Economics of Technology Diffusion: Linking innovation adoption, lagged investments, and productivity growth’, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 10-029, Stanford, CA: Stanford Institute for Policy Research.
17. De Bresson, C. and B. Murray (1984), Innovation in Canada: A Retrospective Survey: 1945–1978, New Westminster, BC: Cooperative Research Unit on Science and Technology (CRUST).
18. Eurostat (2012), Community Innovation Survey database, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/science:technology_innovation/data/database, accessed 14 August.
19. Foyn, F. (1999), ‘Synthesis report from the national survey reports on CIS-II’, Working Party of National Experts on Science and Technology Indicators: Joint Eurostat/OECD Workshop on Innovation Surveys, DSTI/EAS/STP/NESTI/RD(99)3, Paris: OECD.
20. Foyn, F. (2006), ‘Using the Oslo methodology to measure innovation: The community innovation survey approach’, in W. Blankley, M. Scerri, N. Molotja and I. Saloojee (eds), Measuring Innovation in OECD and non-OECD Countries, Cape Town, HSRC Press, pp. 111–22.
21. Godin, B. (2001a), ‘Tradition and innovation: The historical contingency of R&D statisti- cal classifications’, Working Paper No. 11, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Montreal: INRS.
22. Godin, B. (2001b), ‘The number makers: A short history of international science and tech- nology statistics’, Working Paper No. 9, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Montreal: INRS.
23. Godin, B. (2009), ‘The rise of innovation surveys: Measuring a fuzzy concept’, Working Paper No. 16, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Montreal: INRS.
24. Hansen, J.A. (1987), International Comparisons of Innovation Indicator Development, Report for the National Science Foundation, Washington, DC: NSF.
25. Hughes, A., K. Moore and N. Kataria (2011), Innovation in Public Sector Organizations: A Pilot Survey for Measuring Innovation Across the Public Sector, London: Nesta.
26. IIT Research Institute (1968), Technology in Retrospect and Critical Events in Science (TRACES), Washington, DC: NSF.
27. Kline, S.J. and N. Rosenberg (1986), ‘An overview of innovation’, in R. Landau and N. Rosenberg (eds), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 275–305.
28. Levin, R.C., A.K. Klevorick, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter (1987), ‘Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–831.
29. Myers, S. and D.G. Marquis (1969), Successful Industrial Innovation: A Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms, NSF 60-17, Washington, DC: NSF.
30. NAO (National Accounting Office) (2006), Achieving Innovation in Central Government Organizations, London: NAO.
31. Noel, V. and G. Prizeman (2005), Using Cognitive Question Testing to Pretest a Questionnaire for a Large-Scale Postal Survey of Nonprofit Organizations, School of Business Studies, Dublin: Trinity College Dublin.
32. OECD (1963), Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development, Paris, OECD.
33. OECD (1981), Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD.
34. OECD (1992), Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD.
35. OECD (2002), Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD.
36. OECD/Eurostat (1997), Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data – Oslo Manual, Paris: OECD.
37. OECD/Eurostat (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris: OECD.
38. Pavitt, K., M. Robson and J. Townsend (1987), ‘The size distribution of innovating firms in the United Kingdom: 1945–1983’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 297–316.
39. Qureschi, H., and O. Rowlands (2004), ‘User satisfaction surveys and cognitive question testing in the public sector: The case of personal services in England’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7, 273–87.
40. Schumpeter, J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Sirilli, G. (1998), ‘Old and new paradigms in the measurement of R&D’, Science and Public Policy, 25, 305–11.
42. Smith, K. (1992), ‘Technological innovation indicators: Experience and prospects’, Science and Public Policy, 19, 383–92.
43. Smith, K. (1997), ‘Innovation measurement and the CIS approach’, in A. Arundel and R. Garrelfs (eds), Innovation Measurement and Policies, Luxembourg: European Commission, EIMS publication 50, pp. 20–26.
44. Stead, H. (2001), ‘The development of S&T statistics in Canada: An informal account’, Paper No. 5, Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, Montreal: INRS.
45. Townsend, J. (1981), ‘Science innovation in Britain since 1945’, SPRU Occasional Paper Series No. 16, Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.
46. Wilhelmsen, L. (2012), ‘The Norwegian innovation survey: Combined with the R&D survey versus a separate CIS’, presentation to the Eurostat CIS Workshop, Luxembourg, 2–3 July.
47. Young, A. (1997), ‘Revising the Oslo Manual’, in A. Arundel and R. Garrelfs (eds), Innovation Measurement and Policies, Luxembourg: European Commission, EIMS publication 50, pp. 92–8.