Services before trial and sentence: achievement, decline and potential

Handbook of Probation

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 181-209

  Haines, Kevin ^a   Morgan, Rod ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WALES   (United Kingdom)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145547682     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781843926184-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (90)

1. Ashworth, A. (1994) The Criminal Process: An Evaluative Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
2. Audit Commission (1989) Promoting Value for Money in the Probation Service. London:HMSO.
3. Beamer, S. (1991) ‘A Study of HMP Holloway’s Bail Unit - Users and Staff’s Perspectives’. Unpublished MSc thesis, London: LSE.
4. Beaumont, B. (1995) ‘Managerialism and the probation service’, in B. Williams (ed.), Probation Values. Birmingham: Venture Press.
5. Bottomley, A. K. (1970) Prison Before Trial, Occasional Papers in Social Administration No. 39. London: Bell.
6. Bottoms, A.E. and McWilliams, W. (1986) ‘Social enquiry reports twenty-five years after the Streatfeild Report’, in P. Bean and D. Whynes (eds), Barbara Wootton: Social Science and Public Policy. London: Tavistock.
7. Bowling, B. and Phillips, C. (2002) Racism, Crime and Justice. London: Longman.
8. Brittan, L. (1984) ‘A strategy for criminal justice’, Howard Journal, 23 (1): 3-10.
9. Burnett, R. and Eaton, G. (2004) Factors Associated with Effective Practice in Approved Premises: A Literature Review, Online Report 65/04. London: Home Office.
10. Burney, E. (1979) JP: Magistrate, Court and Community. London: Hutchinson.
11. Carter, P. (2003) Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime: A New Approach. London: Home Office and Strategy Unit.
12. Carter, R.M. and Wilkins, L.T. (1967) ‘Some factors in sentencing policy’, Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 58 (4): 503-14.
13. Cavadino, P. and Gibson, B. (1993) Bail, the Law, Best Practice, and the Debate. Winchester:Waterside Press.
14. Crisp, D., Whittaker, C. and Harris, J. (1995) Public Interest Case Assessment Schemes. London: Home Office.
15. Curran, J.H. and Chambers, G.A. (1982) Social Enquiry Reports in Scotland. Edinburgh:HMSO.
16. Davies, C. (1971) ‘Pre-trial imprisonment: a Liverpool study’, British Journal of Criminology, 2: 32-48.
17. Drakeford, M., Haines, K., Cotton, B. and Octigan, M. (2001) Pre-Trial Services and the Future of Probation. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
18. Faulkner, D. (1989) ‘The future of the probation service: a view from government’, in R. Shaw and K. Haines (eds), The Criminal Justice System: A Central Role for the Probation Service. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
19. Flood-Page, C. and Mackie, A. (1998) Sentencing Practice: An Examination of Decisions in Magistrates’ Courts and the Crown Court in the mid-1990s, Research Study 180. London: Home Office.
20. Ford, P. (1972) Advising Sentencers: A Study of Recommendations Made by Probation Officers to the Courts, Occasional Paper No. 5. Oxford: Oxford University Penal Research Unit.
21. Fullwood, C. (1989) ‘Probation, community and inter-agency dimensions: a future look’, in R. Shaw and K. Haines (eds), The Criminal Justice System: A Central Role for the Probation Service. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
22. Garland, D. (1985) Punishment and Welfare: A History of Penal Strategies. Aldershot:Gower.
23. Gelsthorpe, L. and Raynor, P. (1995) ‘Quality and effectiveness in probation officers’ reports to sentencers’, British Journal of Criminology, 35 (2): 188-200.
24. Godson, D. and Mitchell, C. (1991) Bail Information Schemes in English Magistrates Courts. London: Inner London Probation Service.
25. Haines, K. (1996) Understanding Modern Juvenile Justice. Aldershot: Avebury.
26. Haines, K. and Octigan, M. (1999) Reducing Remands in Custody: The Probation Service and Remand Services. London: ACOP.
27. Hankinson, I. and Stephens, D. (1986) ‘Ever decreasing circles: practitioners and probation bureaucracy’, Probation Journal, 33 (1): 17-19.
28. Hine, J., McWilliams, W. and Pease, K. (1978) ‘Recommendations, social information and sentencing’, Howard Journal, 17: 91-100.
29. HM Inspectorate of Probation (2000) Towards Race Equality: A Thematic Report. London:HMIP.
30. HM Inspectorate of Probation (2002) Probation Service Workload Prioritisation - Report of an HMIP National Survey. London: HMIP.
31. HM Inspectorate of Probation (2003) 2002/3 Annual Report. London: HMIP.
32. HM Inspectorate of Probation (2004a) 2003/4 Annual Report. London: HMIP.
33. HM Inspectorate of Probation (2004b) Towards Race Equality: Follow-Up Inspection Report. London: HMIP.
34. Home Office (1978) The Sentence of the Court - A Handbook for Courts on the Treatment of Offenders. London: HMSO.
35. Home Office (1990) Partnership in Dealing with Offenders in the Community. London:Home Office.
36. Home Office (1992a) Partnership in Dealing with Offenders in the Community: A Decision Document. London: Home Office.
37. Home Office (1992b) Bail Information Schemes: Practice and Effect, Research Paper No. 69. London: Home Office.
38. Home Office (1999) Pre-Sentence Reports and Specific Sentence Reports, Probation Circular 85/99. Home Office: Probation Unit.
39. Home Office (2002) Probation Statistics England and Wales 2001. London: National Statistics.
40. Home Office (2003) Criminal Statistics England and Wales 2002. London: National Statistics.
41. Home Office (2004a) Offender Management Caseload Statistics England and Wales, Statistical Report No. 15/04. London: National Statistics.
42. Home Office (2004b) Criminal Statistics England and Wales 2003, Cm 6361. London:National Statistics.
43. Home Office (2005a) Restructuring Probation to Reduce Re-offending. London: Home Office.
44. Home Office (2005b) Sentencing Statistics 2004, Statistical Bulletin No. 15/05. London:National Statistics.
45. Hood, R. (1992) Race and Sentencing. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
46. Hough, M., Jacobson, J. and Millie, A. (2003) The Decision to Imprison: Sentencing and the Prison Population. London: Prison Reform Trust.
47. Humphrey, C. (1991) ‘Calling on the experts: the Financial Management Initiative (FMI), private sector consultants and the probation service’, Howard Journal, 30 (1):1-18.
48. King, M. (1971) Bail or Custody. London: Cobden Trust.
49. King, R.D. and Morgan, R. (1976) A Taste of Prison: Custodial Conditions for Trial and Remand Prisoners. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
50. Lloyd, C. (1986) Response to SNOP. Cambridge: Institute of Criminology.
51. McWilliams, W. (1983) ‘The mission to the English police courts 1876-1936', Howard Journal, 22: 129-47.
52. McWilliams, W. (1985) ‘The mission transformed: professionalism of probation between the wars’, Howard Journal, 24: 257-74.
53. McWilliams, W. (1986) ‘The English probation system and the diagnostic ideal’, Howard Journal, 25: 241-60.
54. McWilliams, W. (1987) ‘Probation, pragmatism and policy’, Howard Journal, 26: 97-121.
55. McWilliams, W. (1992) ‘The rise and development of management thought’, in R. Statham and P. Whitehead (eds), Managing the Probation Service. Harlow:Longman.
56. Morgan, R. (1994) ‘An awkward anomaly: remand prisoners’, in E. Player and M. Jenkins (eds), Prisons After Woolf: Reform Through Riot. London: Routledge.
57. Morgan, R. (1997) ‘Imprisonment: current concerns and a brief history since 1945', in M. Maguire, R. Morgan and R. Reiner (eds), Oxford Handbook of Criminology, 3rd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Morgan, R. (2003a) Carcentricity: Fatal Attractions. Annual McClintock Lecture, Edinburgh.
59. Morgan, R. (2003b) ‘Thinking about the demand for probation services’, Probation Journal, 50: 7-19.
60. Morgan, R. (2006) ‘Race, probation and inspections’, in S. Lewis, P. Raynor, D. Smith and A. Wardak (eds), Race and Probation. Cullompton: Willan.
61. Morgan, P. and Henderson, P. (1998) Remand Decisions and Offending on Bail: Evaluation of the Bail Process Project, Home Office Research Study 184. London: Home Office.
62. Morison Report (1962) Report of the Departmental Committee on the Probation Service, Cmnd 1650. London: HMSO.
63. Mott, J. (1977) ‘Decision making and social inquiry reports in one juvenile court: an examination’, British Journal of Social Work, 14 (4): 361-78.
64. National Audit Office (2004) Facing Justice: Tackling Defendants’ Non-attendance at Court. London: NAO.
65. National Probation Directorate (2001) A New Choreography: An Integrated Strategy for the National Probation Service for England and Wales - Strategic Framework 2001-2004. London: NPD.
66. National Probation Service (2000) Bail Information, Probation Circular 29/2000. Home Office: National Probation Service.
67. National Probation Service (2005a) Criminal Justice Act 2003 - New Sentences and the New Report Framework, Probation Circular 18/2005. Home Office: National Probation Service.
68. National Probation Service (2005b) Bail Information Schemes, Probation Circular 19/2005. Home Office: National Probation Service.
69. National Probation Service (2005c) National Standards (2005) and National Offender Management Model: Application of Tiering Framework, Probation Circular 65/2005. London: Home Office.
70. NOMS/NPS (2005) National Standards 2005. London: NOMS/NPS.
71. Nottingham, S. and Mitchell, C. (1993) Bail Information Schemes in Prisons, Review of Prison Service Agency Action Plan. London: Home Office.
72. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2003) Supporting People (England) Directions 2003. London: ODPM.
73. Peters, A. (1986) ‘Main currents in criminal law theory’, in J. Van Dijk, C. Haffmans, F. Rüter, J. Schutte and S. Stolwijk (eds), Criminal Law in Action: An Overview of Current Issues in Western Societies. Arnhem: Gouda Quint BV.
74. Prison Service (1999) Bail Information Schemes, Prison Service Order No. 6101. London:Home Office.
75. Raynor, P. and Vanstone, M. (2002) Understanding Community Penalties: Probation, Policy and Social Change. Buckingham: Open University Press.
76. Raynor, P., Gelsthorpe, L. and Tisi, A. (1995) ‘Quality assurance, pre-sentence reports and the probation service’, British Journal of Social Work, 25 (4): 477-88.
77. Roberts, J. and Roberts, C. (1982) ‘Social enquiry reports and sentencing’, Howard Journal, 21: 76-93.
78. Rothman, D. (1980) Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America. Boston: Little, Brown.
79. Sentencing Guidelines Council (2004) New Sentences: Criminal Justice Act 2003 -Guideline. London: SGC.
80. Shapland, J. (1981) Between Conviction and Sentence: The Process of Mitigation. London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
81. Shaw, R. (1992) ‘Corporate management in probation’, in R. Statham and P. Whitehead (eds), Managing the Probation Service. Harlow: Longman.
82. Simon, F. and Weatheritt, M. (1974) The Use of Bail and Custody by London Magistrates’ Courts Before and After the Criminal Justice Act 1967, Research Study No. 20. London:Home Office.
83. Smith, D., Paylor, I. and Mitchell, P. (1993) ‘Partnership between the independent sector and the probation service’, Howard Journal, 32: 25-39.
84. Stanley, S.J. and Murphy, B. (1984) Inner London Probation Service: Survey of Social Enquiry Reports. London: ILPS.
85. Streatfeild Report (1961) Report of the Interdepartmental Report on the Business of the Criminal Courts, Cmnd 1289. London: HMSO.
86. Thorpe, J. (1979) Social Inquiry Reports: A Survey, Home Office Research Studies 48. London: Home Office.
87. Vanstone, M. (1995) ‘Managerialism and the ethics of management’, in R. Hugman and D. Smith (eds), Ethical Issues in Social Work. London: Routledge.
88. Warner, S. and McIvor, G. (1994) Pre-Trial Services in Scotland: An Evaluation of Two Experimental Bail Information and Accommodation Schemes. Scottish Office: Central Research Unit.
89. Wilkinson, J. (1990) ‘The Holloway Bail Unit: Review of the First Year’, unpublished report. London: ILPS.
90. Williams, B. (1992) Bail Information - An Evaluation of the Scheme at HMP Moorland. Bradford: Haughton Publishing.