Quantification and Aspect

Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics

Volumn 32, Issue , 2005, Pages 61-80

  Di Sciullo, Anne Marie ^a   Slabakova, Roumyana ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aspect calculation; definiteness; nominal interpretation; quantification; terminativity

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145164857     PISSN: 18730043     EISSN: 22151788     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (35)

1. Babko-Malaya, O. (1999). Zero Morphology: a Study of Aspect, Argument Structure, and Case. PhD dissertation, Rutgers.
2. Bach, E., Jelinek, E., Kratzer, A., & Partee, B. (1995). Introduction. In E.Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Quantif ication and Natural Languages (Vol. 1, pp.1-11). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
3. Carlson, G. N. (1983). Marking constituents. In F. Heny & B. Richards (Eds.), Linguistic Categ ories (Vol. 1: 69-98). Dordrecht: Reidel.
4. Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
5. Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist Inquiries, MITWP L, 15.
6. Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp.89-155). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
7. Chomsky, N. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
8. Declerck, R. (1989). Boundedness and the structure of situations. Leuvense Bij dragen, 78, 285-318.
9. De Hoop, H. (1995). On the characterization of the weak-strong distinction. In E.Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer & B. Partee (Eds.), Quantification and Natural Languages (Vol. 2: 421-450). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Depraetere, I. (1995). On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. Linguistics and Philosophyh, 18, 1–18.
11. Di Sciullo, A. M. (1997). Prefixed verbs and adjunct identification. In A. M. Di Sciullo (Ed.), Projections and Interface Conditions (pp.52-73). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Di Sciullo, A.M. (1999). Verbal structure and variation. In E. Trevino & J. Lema (Eds.), Semantic Issues in Romance Syntax (pp 39-55). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
13. Di Sciullo, A. M. (2000). Paths in Words . Paper presented at the ESSLI 2000 Conference. Birmingham.
14. Di Sciullo, A. M. (in press). Asy mmetry in Morphology. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
15. Di Sciullo, A. M., & Klipple, E. (1994). Modify ing affixes. WECOL.
16. Dowty, D. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ . Dordrecht: Reidel.
17. Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic roles and argument selection. Language, 67, 547-619.
18. Filip, H. (1992). Aspect and interpretation of nominal arguments. In C. P. Canakis, G. P. Chan, & J. M. Denton (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp.139-158). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Filip, H. (1993/1999). Aspect, Situation Types and Nominal Reference. PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley. 1993. Published as Aspect, Eventualityt Ty pes and Noun Phrase Semantics. 1999. New York: Garland Publishing.
20. Filip, H. (2001). Nominal and verbal semantic structure: Analogies and interactions. Language Sciences, 23, 453-501.
21. Filip, H. (2004). Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Accepted for publication in a special issue of Journal o f Slavic Linguistics, W. Browne & B. H. Partee (Eds.). Vol. 12: 1-2.
22. Heim, I. (1982). The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
23. Kamp, H. (1981). A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen & M. Stockhof (Eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Part 1: 277-322. Amsterdam.
24. Krifka, M. (1998). The origins of telicity. In S. Rothstein (Ed.), Events and Grammarr (pp.197–235). Dordrecht: Reidel.
25. Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs of quantification. In E.L. Keenan (Ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language (pp.3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Longobardi, G. (2001). How comparative is semantics? A unified parametric theory of bare nouns and proper names. Natural Language Semantics, 9, 335-369.
27. Partee, B. H., Bach, E. & Kratzer, A. (1987). Quantification: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
28. Piñon, C. (1995). An Ontology of Event Semantics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
29. Slabakova, R. (2001a). Telicity in the Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Slabakova, R. (2001b). Aspectual constraints in the mental lexicon. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30. 2, 197-217.
31. Tenny, C. L. (1994). Aspectual Roles and the Sy ntax-Semantics Interf ace. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophyh . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
33. Verkuyl, H. J. (1972). On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.
34. Verkuyl, H. J. (1993). A Theory of Aspectuality. The Interaction between Temp oral and Atemp oral Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Wierzbicka, A. (1967). On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To Honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. 3 (pp.2231-2249). The Hague: Mouton.