Community, Culture, and Citizenship in Cyberspace

Handbook of Research on New Literacies

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 671-697

  Thomas, Angela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145145033     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410618894-29     Document Type: Chapter

References (103)

1. Associated Press. (2005). Cartoon controversy. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www. cnn.com/2005/SHOWBIZ/TV/04/27/cartoon.controversy.ap
2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson and M. Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Balsamo, A. (2000). The virtual body in cyberspace. In D. Bell and B. M. Kennedy (Eds.), The cybercultures reader (pp. 489-503). London: Routledge.
4. Baym, N. K. (1995). From practice to culture on usenet. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 29-52). Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell Publishers.
5. Baym, N. K. (1998). The emergence of on-line community. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). London: Sage Publications.
6. Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. London: Routledge.
7. Biocca, F. (1997). The cyborg’s dilemma. Progressive embodiment in virtual environments. The Journal of Computer-Mediated Communications, 3(2), 12-26.
8. Braidotti, R. (2003). Cyberfeminism with a difference. In A. Jones (Ed.), The feminism and visual culture reader (pp. 531-533). London: Routledge.
9. Braidotti, R. (2005). A critical cartography of feminist post-postmodernism. Australian Feminist Studies, 20(47), 169-180.
10. Bruckman, A. (1992). Identity workshop: Emergent social and psychological phenomena in text-based virtual reality. Unpublished article. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from MIT, Media Laboratory Web site: ftp://ftp.cc.gatech.edu/pub/people/asb/papers/identityworkshop. rtf
11. Cherny, L., and Weise, E. R. (Eds.). (1996). Wired women: Gender and new realities in cyberspace. Seattle, WA: Seal Press.
12. Cohill, A. M., and Kavanaugh, A. L. (Eds.). (1997). Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Norwood, MA: Artech House, Inc.
13. Collins-Jarvis, L. A. (1993). Gender representation in an electronic city hall: Female adoption of Santa Monica’s PEN system. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 37(1), 49-66.
14. Consalvo, M. (1997). Cash cows hit the web: Gender and communications technology. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 21(1), 98-115.
15. Correll, S. (1995). The ethnography of an electronic bar: The lesbian cafe. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 24(3), 270-298.
16. Cranny-Francis, A. (2005). Multimedia. London: Sage Publications.
17. Cranny-Francis, A., Waring, W., Stavropoulos, P., and Kirkby, J. (2003). Gender studies: Terms and debates. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
18. Cuene. (2005, June 5). Web 2.0: Is it a whole new internet? Retrieved September 20, 2005, from http://cuene.typepad.com/blog/2005/05/web_20_at_mima.html
19. Danet, B. (1998). Text as mask: Gender, play, and performance on the internet. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 129-158). London: Sage Publications.
20. Danet, B., Ruedenberg-Wright, L., and Rosenbaum-Tamari, Y. (1997). Hmmm… Where’s that smoke coming from?: Writing, play and performance on internet relay chat. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2, 4.
21. Davies, J. (2006). Affinities and beyond! Developing ways of seeing in online spaces. ELearning, 3(2), 217-234.
22. Davis, I. (2005, July 4). Talis, Web 2.0, and All That. Internet Alchemy Weblog. Retrieved September 20, 2005, from http://internetalchemy.org/2005/07/talis-web-20-and-allthat
23. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practices of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley:University of California Press.
24. Del.icio.us Social Bookmarks Manager. (2005). Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://del.icio. us
25. Dibbell, J. (1993). A rape in cyberspace or how an evil clown, a Haitian trickster spirit, two wizards, and a cast of dozens turned a catabase into a society. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://ftp.game.org/pub/mud/text/research/VillageVoice.txt
26. Dibbell, J. (1998). My tiny life. Crime and passion in a virtual world. New York: Henry Holt Company.
27. Dietrich, D. (1997). (Re)-Fashioning the techno-erotic woman: Gender and textuality in the cybercultural matrix. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 169-184). London: Sage Publications.
28. Donath, J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 25-59). London: Routledge.
29. Downey, G. L., and Dumit, J. (Eds.). (1998). Cyborgs and citadels: Anthropological interventions in emerging sciences and technologies. Santa Fe, NM: The School of American Research Press.
30. Ebben, M., and Kramarae, C. (1993). Women and information technologies: Creating a cyberspace of our own. In H. J. Taylor, C. Kramarae, and M. Ebben (Eds.), Women, information technology, and scholarship (pp. 5-27). Urbana, IL: Women, Information Technology, and Scholarship Colloquium.
31. Emig, W., and Herring, S. (2005). Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias. Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-38) (pp.1-10). Los Alamitos: IEEE Press.
32. Escobar, A. (1996). Welcome to cyberia: Notes on the anthropology of cyberculture. In Z. Sardar and J. R. Ravetz (Eds.), Cyberfutures: Culture and politics on the information superhighway (pp. 111-137). New York: New York University Press.
33. Everard, J. (2000). Virtual states: The internet and the boundaries of the nation-state. London:Routledge.
34. Farrell, H. (2005, October 7). The blogosphere as a carnival of ideas. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved October 22, 2005, from http://chronicle.com/free/v52/ i07/07b01401.htm
35. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin Books.
36. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
37. Gibson, W. (1986). Neuromancer. New York: Ace Books.
38. Gurak, L. (1999). The promise and the peril of social action in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 243-263). London: Routledge.
39. Guzzetti, B. J., and Gamboa, M. (2004). Zines for social justice: Adolescent girls writing on their own. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(4), 408-436.
40. Haraway, D. (2003). A cyborg manifesto: Science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In A. Jones (Ed.), The feminism and visual culture reader (pp. 475-496). London: Routledge.
41. Haraway, D. J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York:Routledge.
42. Harrill, R. (2002). Latest fall fashion includes wearable technology. University Week, 20(1). Retrieved May 31, 2005, from the University of Washington Web site: http://admin.urel. washington.edu/uweek/archives/issue/uweek_story_small.asp?id=611
43. Hayles, K. N. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). New York: Harper and Row.
45. Herring, S. (1996a). Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. In R. Kling (Ed.), Computerization and controversy: Value conflicts and social choices (pp. 476-489). San Diego: Academic Press.
46. Herring, S. (1996b). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in CMC. In C. Ess (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer-mediated communication (pp. 115-146). Albany: State University of New York Press.
47. Herring, S. (1996c). Two variants of an electronic message schema. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 81-106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
48. Herring, S. (Ed.). (1996d). Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
49. Herring, S., Kouper, I., Scheidt, L. A., and Wright, E. (2004). Women and children last: The discursive construction of weblogs. In L. Gurak, S. Antonijevic, L. Johnson, C. Ratcliff, and J. Reyman (Eds.), Into the blogosphere: Rhetoric, community, and culture of weblogs. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://blog.lib.umn.edu/blogosphere
50. Hicks, M. (2004). Online collaboration borne from multiplayer game. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.eweek.com/article2/0, 1759, 1526440, 00.asp
51. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage Publications.
52. Holeton, R. (1998). Composing cyberspace: Identity, community, and knowledge in the electronic age. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
53. Humphrey, S. (2006). Getting the reader on side - Exploring adolescent online political discourse. E-Learning, 3(1), pp. 143-157.
54. Jakobsson, M. (1999). Why Bill was killed - understanding social interaction in virtual worlds. In A. Nijholt, O. Donk, and B. van Dijk (Eds.), Interactions in virtual worlds. Proceedings of the fifteenth Twente workshop on language technology. Enschede, The Netherlands: Twente University. Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.informatik. umu.se/~mjson/files/bill.pdf
55. Jakobsson, M. (2001). Rest in peace, Bill the bot. Death and life in virtual worlds. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars. Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments (pp. 63-76) London: Springer.
56. Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. New York:Routledge.
57. Jenkins, H. (2004, February). Why Heather can write. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/13473
58. Jones, S. G. (Ed.). (1998). Cybersociety 2.0. Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
59. Jones, S. G. (2004). Conclusion: Contexting the network. In P. N. Howard and S. G. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The internet in context (pp. 325-334). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
60. Kelly, K. (2005). We are the web. Wired, 13(8), Retrieved October 22, 2005, from http:// www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.08/tech.html
61. Kenway, J., and Bullen, E. (2001). Consuming children. London: Open University Press.
62. Kollock, P. (1999). The economies of online cooperations: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220-239). London: Routledge.
63. Kollock, P., and Smith, M. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication:Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 109-128). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
64. Kress, G., and Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London:Routledge.
65. Livingstone, S., Bober, M., and Helsper, A. J. (2005). Active participation or just more information? Information, communication, and society, 8(3), 287-314.
66. Ludicorp Research and Development Ltd. (2004/2005). Flickr. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.flickr.com
67. Marshall, J. (2004). Governance, structure, and existence: Authenticity, rhetoric, race, and gender on an internet mailing list. Proceedings of the Australian Electronic Governance Conference, Centre for Public Policy, University of Melbourne. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://www.publicpolicy.unimelb.edu.au/egovernance/papers/21_Marshall. pdf
68. Mazzarella, S. R. (2005). Girl wide web: Girls, the internet, and the negotiation of identity. New York: Peter Lang.
69. McLaughlin, M. L., Osborne, K. K., and Ellison, N. B. (1997). Virtual community in a telepresence environment. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 146-168). London: Sage Publications.
70. McManus, R. (2005, August 6). Web 2.0 is not about version numbers or betas. Read/Write Web. Retrieved October 22, 2005, from http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/002791. php
71. McNay, L. (1994). Foucault: Critical introduction. Cambridge, U.K.: Polity Press.
72. Mele, C. (1999). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities: The internet as a tool for collective action. In M. A. Smith and P. Kollock (Ed.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 290-310). London: Routledge.
73. Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the present: Social movements and individual needs in contemporary society. London: Hutchinson.
74. MIT. (2005). Seamless. Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://seamless.sigtronica.org/2005/ projects.html
75. Moll, L (2000). Inspired by Vygotsky: Ethnographic experiments in education. In C. Lee and P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspective on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 256-268). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
76. Moriwaki, K. (2004, July/August). Between the skin and the garden: New modes of interaction in the wearable data environment. HorizonZero, 16. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.horizonzero.ca/textsite/wear.php?is=16andfile=7andtlang=0
77. Parent, S., and Leech, A. (2004, July/August). Wear: Smart clothes, fashionable technologies. HorizonZero, 16. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.horizonzero.ca/textsite/ wear.php?is=16andart=0andfile=0andtlang=0
78. Reid, E. (1994). Cultural formations in text-based virtual realities. In P. Ludlow (Ed.), High noon on the electronic frontier: Conceptual issues in cyberspace (pp. 326-345). Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://semlab2.sbs.sunysb.edu/Users/pdludlow/highnoon.html
79. Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.rheingold. com/vc/book
80. Rheingold, H. (1994). The virtual community: Finding connection in a computerized world. London: Secker and Warburg.
81. Schmitz, J. (1997). Structural relations, electronic media, and social change: The public electronic network and the homeless. In S. G. Jones (Ed.), Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety (pp. 80-101). London: Sage Publications.
82. Schuler, D. (1994). Community networks: Building a new participatory medium. Communications of the ACM, 37(1), 39-51.
83. Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
84. Sefton-Green, J. (2001). The ‘end of school’ or just ‘out of school’? ICT, the home, and digital cultures. In C. Beavis and C. Durant (Eds.), P(ICT)ures of English (pp. 162-174). Kent Town, SA: Wakefield Press/AATE.
85. Shinkle, E. (2003, September). Gardens, games, and the anamorphic subject: Tracing the body in the virtual landscape. Fineart Forum, 17(9). Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.fineartforum.org/Backissues/Vol_17/faf_v17_n09/reviews/shinkle.html
86. Silver, D. (1999). Localizing the global village: Lessons from the blacksburg electronic village. In R. B. Browne and M. W. Fishwick (Eds.), The global village: Dead or alive? (pp. 79-92). Bowling Green, OH: Popular Press.
87. Silver, D. (2000). Margins in the wires: Looking for race, gender, and sexuality in the blacksburg electronic village. In B. E. Kolko, L. Nakamura, and G. B. Rodman (Eds.), Race in cyberspace: Politics, identity, and cyberspace (pp. 133-150). New York: Routledge.
88. Smith, M. A., and Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London:Routledge.
89. Spender, D. (1998). Gender-bending. In R. Holeton (Ed.), Composing cyberspace - Identity, community and knowledge in the electronic age (pp. 69-75). New York:McGraw-Hill.
90. Stone, A. R. (1991). Will the real body stand up?: Boundaries stories about virtual cultures. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace. First steps (pp. 81-118). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
91. Taylor, T. L. (1999). Life in virtual worlds: Plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 3(43), 436-449.
92. Taylor, T. L. (2002). Living digitally: Embodiment in virtual worlds. In R. Schroeder (Ed.), The social life of avatars: Human interaction in virtual worlds (pp. 40-62). London:Springer-Verlag.
93. Thiel, S. (2005). “IM me”: Identity construction and gender negotiation in the world of adolescent girls and instant messaging. In S. R. Mazzarella (Ed.), Girl wide web: Girls, the internet, and the negotiation of identity (pp. 179-202). New York: Peter Lang.
94. Thomas, A. (2004a). e-selves@palace.kids: Literacy and identity in a virtual community. Unpublished manuscript, Charles Darwin University, Australia.
95. Thomas, A. (2004b). Digital literacies of the cybergirl. E-Learning, 1(3), 358-382.
96. Thomas, A. (2004c). i-Anya. Personal weblog. http://angelaathomas.com
97. Thomas, A. (2005a). Children online: Learning in a virtual community of practice. E-Learning, 2(1), 27-38.
98. Thomas, A. (2005b,) May. Fictional blogging and the narrative identity of adolescent girls. Paper prepared for Blogtalk Downunder Conference, Sydney, Australia.
99. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen. New York: Simon and Schuster.
100. Wellman, B. (1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the internet (pp. 179-205). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
101. Wellman, B., Salaff, J., Dimitrova, D., Garton, L., Gulia, M., and Haythornwaite, C. (1996). Computer networks as social networks: Collaborative work, telework, and virtual community. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 213-238.
102. Wenger, E. (2002). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. London:Cambridge University Press.
103. Wikipedia. (2001-2005). Wikipedia: The free encyclopedia. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia