Public relations in science: Managing the trust portfolio

Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 147-157

  Borchelt, Rick E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145127930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203928240-16     Document Type: Chapter

References (22)

1. Grunig, J. E. and Grunig, L. A. (2001) Guidelines for Formative and Evaluative Research in Public Affairs:A Report for the Department of Energy Office of Science, College Park, MD: Department of Communication, University of Maryland; www.instituteforpr.org/files/uploads/2001_PA_Research.pdf
2. Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology (revised edn), New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.
3. Weigold, M. F. (2001) ‘Communicating science: a review of the literature’, Science Communication, 23: 164-93.
4. AAAS (2004) AAAS Survey Report, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/aaas_survey_report.pdf
5. Bauer, M. W., Allen N. and Miller S. (2007) ‘What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda’, Public Understanding of Science, 16: 79-95.
6. Bernard, K. and Duffy, S. (1982) ‘Persuasion and uplift in American theatrical advertising during the Depression’, Journal of American Culture, 5: 66-71.
7. Friedman, S., Dunwoody, S. and Rogers, C. L. (eds) (1986) Scientists and Journalists: Reporting Science as News, New York: Free Press.
8. Gregory, J. and Miller, S. (1998) Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility, New York: Plenum Press.
9. Grunig, J. E. and Grunig, L. A. (2001) Guidelines for Formative and Evaluative Research in Public Affairs:A Report for the Department of Energy Office of Science, College Park, MD: Department of Communication, University of Maryland; www.instituteforpr.org/files/uploads/2001_PA_Research.pdf
10. Grunig, J. E. and Grunig, L. A. (2006) ‘Characteristics of excellent communication, ' in Gillis, T. L. (ed.) The IABC Handbook of Organizational Communication: A Guide to Internal Communication, Public Relations, Marketing, and Leadership, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 3-18.
11. Grunig, J. E. and Hung, C. F. (2002) ‘The effect of relationships on reputation and reputation on relationships: a cognitive, behavioral study’, paper presented at the PRSA Educator’s Academy 5th Annual International, Interdisciplinary Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, Florida, 8-10 March 2002.
12. Grunig, J. E. and Hunt, T. (1984) Managing Public Relations, San Diego, CA: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.
13. Grunig, L. (1997) ‘Excellence in public relations’, in Caywood, C. L. (ed.) The Handbook of Strategic Public Relations and Integrated Communications, New York: McGraw-Hill, 286-300.
14. Grunig, L., Grunig, J. E. and Dozier, D. M. (2002) Excellent Public Relations and Effective Organizations:A Study of Communication Management in Three Countries, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Haerlin, B. and Parr, D. (1999) ‘How to restore public trust in science’, Nature 400: 499.
16. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000) Science and Society, 3rd Report, London: HMSO.
17. Kalfoglou, A., Scott, J. and Hudson, K. (2004) Reproductive Genetic Testing: What America Thinks, Washington, DC: Genetics and Public Policy Center.
18. Lynch, M. (2001) ‘Managing the trust portfolio’, in Proceedings of the PCST2001 Conference. Public Communication of Science and Technology network. http://visits.web.cern.ch/visits/pcst2001/proceedings_list.html
19. Marchand, R. (1998) Creating the Corporate Soul: The Rise of Public Relations and Corporate Imagery in American Public Relations, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Millstone, E. and van Zwanenberg, P. (2000) ‘A crisis of trust: for science, scientists or for institutions?', Nature Medicine, 6: 1307-8.
21. Moore, A. (2000) ‘Would you buy a tomato from this man? How to overcome public mistrust in scientific advances’, EMBO Reports, 1: 210-12.
22. Royal Society (1985) The Public Understanding of Science, London: Royal Society.