Developmental Considerations in Addressing the AAC Needs of Children With Severe Disabilities

Language Disorders from a Developmental Perspective: Essays in Honor of Robin S. Chapman

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 357-376

  Calculator, Stephen N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85145116943     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315092041-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Bates, E. (1976). Language in context. New York: Academic Press.
2. Beukelman, D., and Mirenda, P. (1998).AACstrategies for beginning communicators: Building opportunities and nonsymbolic communication. In D. Beukelman and P. Mirenda (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (2nd ed., pp. 265-294). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
3. Blischak, D., Lloyd, L., and Fuller, D. (1997). Terminology issues. In L. Lloyd, D. Fuller, and H. Arvidson (Eds.), Augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 38-42). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
4. Bowerman, M. (1978). The acquisition of word meaning: An investigation in some current conflicts. In N.Waterson and C. Snow (Eds.), The development of communication (pp. 263-287). New York: John Wiley.
5. Calculator, S. (1984). Prelinguistic development. In W. Perkins (Ed.), Language handicaps in children (pp. 67-71). New York: Thieme-Stratton.
6. Calculator, S. (1997a). AAC and individuals with severe to profound disabilities. In S. Glennen and D. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 445-471). San Diego: Singular.
7. Calculator, S. (2000). Augmentative and alternative communication. In E. Pritchard Dodge (Ed.), The survival guide for school-based speech-language pathologists (pp. 345-366) San Diego: Singular.
8. Calculator, S. (2002). Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman syndrome and their parents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 340-355.
9. Calculator, S., and Dollaghan, C. (1982). The use of communication boards in a residential setting: An evaluation. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 281-287.
10. Carey, S., and Bartlett, E. (1978). Acquiring a single new word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 15, 17-29.
11. Chadsey-Rusch, J., and Halle, J. (1992). The application of general case instruction to the requesting repertoires of learners with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 121-132.
12. Chapman, R., and Miller, J. (1980). Analyzing language and communication in the child. In R. Schiefelbusch (Ed.), Nonspeech language intervention strategies (pp. 159-196). Baltimore: University Park Press.
13. Clark, E. (1973). What’s in a word? Onthe child’s acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65-110). New York: Academic Press.
14. Cole, K., Dale, P., and Mills, P. (1990).Defining languagedelay in young children by cognitive referencing:Are we saying more than we know? Applied Psycholinguistics, 11, 291-302.
15. Cress, C. (2002). Expanding children’s early augmented behaviors to support symbolic development. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, and J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators (pp. 219-272). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
16. Cress, C., and Marvin, C. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 254-272.
17. Dore, J. (1974). Apragmatic description of early pragmatic development. Journal of Psychololinguistic Research, 3, 343-350.
18. Gerber, S., and Kraat, A. (1992). Use of a developmental model of language acquisition: Applications to children using AAC systems. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 19-32.
19. Glennen, S., and Calculator, S. (1985). Training functional communication board use. Apragmatic approach. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 131-141.
20. Halliday, M. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. New York: Arnold.
21. Iacono, T. (2003). Pragmatic development in individualswith developmental disabilities who use AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, and J. Riechle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 323-360). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
22. Iacono, T., Carter, M., and Hook, J. (1998). Identification of intentional communication in students with severe and multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 14, 102-114.
23. Kangas, K., and Lloyd, L. (1988). Early cognitive skills as prerequisites to augmentative and alternative communication use: What are we waiting for? Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 4, 211-222.
24. Light, J., Collier, B., and Parnes, P. (1985). Communicative interactions between young nonspeaking physically disabled children and their primary caregivers: Part I. Discourse patterns. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1, 74-83.
25. McLaughlin, S. (1998). Introduction to language development. San Diego: Singular.
26. Miller, J., Chapman, R., and Bedrosian, J. (1977, October). Defining developmentally disabled subjects for research: The relationship between etiology, cognitive development, and language and communicative performance. Paper presented at the second annual Boston University conference on language development, Boston.
27. Nelson, K. (1974). Concept, word, and sentence: Interrelations in acquisition and development. Psychological Review, 81, 11-56.
28. Owens, R. (2004). Language disorders: Afunctional approach to assessment and intervention. Boston: Pearson Education.
29. Owens, R., and House, L. (1984). Decision-making process in augmentative communication. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 49, 18-25.
30. Reichle, J., Halle, J., and Johnson, S. (1993). Developing an initial communicative repertoire: Applications and issues for persons with severe disabilities. In A. Kaiser and D. Gray (Eds.), Enhancing children’s communication: Research foundations for intervention (pp. 105-138). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
31. Reichle, J., and Karlan, G. (1985). Decision rules for the adoption of augmentative techniques. In R. Schielelbusch and L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives II (pp. 321-339). Austin, TX: Pro Ed.
32. Rice, M.(1989). Children’s language acquisition. American Psychologist, 44, 149-156.
33. Rowland, C., and Schweigert, P. (2000). Tangible symbols, Tangible outcomes. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 16, 61-78.
34. Rowland, C., and Schweigert, P. (2003). Cognitive skills and AAC. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, and J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 241-275). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
35. Schlosser, R., and Sigafoos, J. (2002). Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: Integrative review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 102-123.
36. Shane, H., and Bashir, A. (1980). Election criteria for the adoption of an augmentative communication system: Preliminary considerations. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 45, 408-414.
37. Siegel, E., and Cress, C. (2002). Overview of the emergence of earlyAACbehaviors. In J. Reichle, D. Beukelman, and J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators (pp. 25-57). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
38. Sigafoos, J. (1999). Creating opportunities for augmentative and alternative communication: Strategies for involving people with developmental disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 15, 183-190.
39. Smith, M., and Grove, N. (2003). Asymmetry in input and output. In J. Light, D. Beukelman, and J. Reichle (Eds.), Communicative competence for individuals who use AAC (pp. 163-195). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
40. Snell, M. (2002). Dynamic assessment. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 163-176.
41. Sutton, A., Soto, G., and Blockberger, S. (2002). Grammatical issues in graphic symbol communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 18, 192-204.
42. Weitz, C., Dexter, M., and Moore, J. (1997).AACand children with developmental disabilities. In S. Glennen and D. DeCoste (Eds.), Handbook of augmentative and alternative communication (pp. 395-431). San Diego: Singular.
43. Wetherby, A., and Prizant, B. (1989). The expression of communicative intent: Assessment issues. Seminars in Speech and Language, 10, 77-91.
44. Wilkinson, K., and McIlvane, W. (2002). Considerations in teaching graphic symbols to beginning communicators. In J. Riechle, D. Beukelman, and J. Light (Eds.), Exemplary practices for beginning communicators (pp. 273-321). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
45. Yoder, P., and Warren, S. (1998). Maternal responsivity predicts the prelinguistic communication that facilitates generalized intentional communication. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 1207-1219.