Minimum income policies in old and new member states

Handbook of Quality of Life in the Enlarged European Union

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 218-234

  Cantillon, Bea ^a   Van Mechelen, Natascha ^a   Schulte, Bernd ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Social Law   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144985825     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203936306-20     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Arriba, A. and Moreno, L. (2005) ‘Spain: poverty, social exclusion and “safety nets”', pp. 141-203, in M. Ferrera (ed.), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe, London: Routledge.
2. Atkinson, A.B. (2004) ‘Could the open method of coordination lead to a basic income for Europe?', in B. Cantillon and J. Vandamme (eds), The Open Method of Coordination and Minimum Income Protection in Europe: Liber Memorialis Herman Deleeck, Leuven: Acco.
3. Barbier, J.-C. (2005) ‘Citizenship and the activation of social protection: a comparative approach’, pp. 113-134, in J.G. Andersen, A.-M. Guillemard, P.H. Jensen and B. Pfau-Effinger (eds), The Changing Face of Welfare, Bristol: Policy Press.
4. Behrendt, C. (2002) At the Margins of the Welfare State, Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. Bonny, I. and Bosco, N. (2002) ‘Income support measures for the poor in European cities’, pp. 81-125, in C. Saraceno (ed.), Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe, Bristol: Policy Press.
6. Bradshaw, J. and Finch, N. (2002) A Comparison of Child Benefit Packages in 22 Countries, UK Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report no 174, Leeds: Corporate Document Services.
7. Cantillon, B. (2004) ‘Minimale inkomensgarantie in Europa tussen subsidiariteit en federalisme’, in B. Cantillon and J. Vandamme (eds), The Open Method of Coordination and Minimum Income Protection in Europe: Liber Memorialis Herman Deleeck, Leuven: Acco.
8. Cantillon, B., Van Mechelen, N., Marx, I. and Van den Bosch, K. (2004) ‘De evolutie van de minimumbescherming in 15 Europese welvaartsstaten in de jaren negentig’, Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Sociale Zekerheid, 46, 3: 513-549.
9. Castles, F.G. (2004) The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Deacon, B., Castle-Kanerova, M. and Manning, N. (1992) The new Eastern Europe London: Sage.
11. Eardley, T., Bradshaw, J., Ditch, J., Gough, I. and Whiteford, P. (1996) Social Assistance in OECD Countries: Synthesis Report, London: HSMO.
12. European Commission (2003) Social Protection in the 13 Candidate Countries: A Comparative Analysis, Brussels.
13. European Commission (2004) Social Protection in the Member States of the European Union, of the European Economic Area and in Switzerland, Brussels: European Commission.
14. Gassmann, F. (2005) ‘How to improve access to social protection for the poor? Lessons from the social assistance reform in Latvia’, paper presented at the conference on Social Protection for Chronic Poverty, IDPM, 23-24 February, Manchester.
15. Hölsch, K. and Kraus, M. (2004) ‘Poverty alleviation and the degree of decentralization in European schemes of social assistance’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14, 2: 143-164.
16. ILO (1942) ‘Approaches to social security: an international survey’, Montreal.
17. Loedemel, I. and Schulte, B. (1992) ‘Social assistance: a part of social security or the poor law in new disguise?', paper presented at the conference Social Security Fifty Years after Beveridge, September, University of York.
18. Marlier, E., Atkinson, A.B., Cantillon, B. and Nolan, B. (2006) The EU and Social Inclusion: Facing the Challenges, Bristol: Policy Press.
19. Matsaganis, M. (2005) ‘Greece - fighting with hands tied behind the back: anti-poverty policy without a minimum income’, pp. 33-83, in M. Ferrera (ed.), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe, London: Routledge.
20. Matsaganis, M., Ferrera, M., Capucha, L. and Moreno, L. (2003) ‘Mending nets in the south: anti-poverty policies in Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain’, Social Policy and Administration, 37, 639-655.
21. Mora, M. (2006) ‘Social cohesion in the Czech Republic: a blessing or a trap?' ECFIN Country Focus, III: 1-6.
22. Nelson, K. (2004) ‘Mechanisms of poverty alleviation: anti-poverty effects of non-means tested and means-tested benefits in five welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 14: 371-390.
23. OECD (2004) Benefits and Wages. Country-chapters Information: Poland, Paris, OECD.
24. Paugam, S. (2003) ‘The Revenu Minimum d’Insertion (RMI) in France: the limits of a progressive social policy’, pp. 29-54, in G. Standing (ed.), Minimum Income Schemes in Europe, Geneva: International Labour Office.
25. Sacchi, S. and Bastagli, F. (2005) ‘Italy - striving uphill but not stopping halfway: the troubled journey of the experimental minimum insertion income’, pp. 84-140, in M. Ferrera (ed.), Welfare State Reform in Southern Europe, London: Routledge.
26. Sainsbury, D. and Morissens, A. (2002) ‘Poverty in Europe in the mid-1990s: the effectiveness of means-tested benefits’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 307-327.
27. Saraceno, C. (2002) ‘Introduction: exploring social assistance dynamics’, pp. 1-34, in C. Saraceno (ed.), Social Assistance Dynamics in Europe, Bristol: Policy Press.
28. Schulte, B. (2002a) ‘Die Transformation von Systemen sozialer Sicherheit in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Die Rolle des europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts am Beispiel des europäischen koordinierenden Sozialrechts’, pp. 649-669, in W. Boecken, F. Ruland and H.-D. Steinmeyer (eds), Sozialrecht und Sozialpolitik in Deutschland und Europa. Festschrift für Bernd Baron von Maydell, Luchterhand: Neuwied.
29. Schulte, B. (2002b) ‘Die “Methode der offenen Koordinierung” - Eine neue politische Strategie in der europäischen Sozialpolitik auch für den Bereich des sozialen Schutzes’, Zeitschrift für Sozialreform, 48: 1-27.
30. Schulte, B. (2005a) ‘The open method of co-ordination as a political strategy in the field of immigrant Integration policy’, pp. 114-121, in R. Süandszlig;muth and W. Weidenfeld (eds), Managing integration: The European Union’s Responsibilities towards Immigrants, Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.
31. Schulte, B. (2005b) ‘Die “offene Methode der Koordinierung” (OMK) als politische Strategie in der europäische Sozialpolitik’, Sozialer Fortschritt, 54: 105-113.
32. Taylor-Gooby, P. (ed.) (2004) New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
33. Torfing, J. (1999) ‘Workfare with welfare: recent reforms of the Danish welfare state’, Journal of European Social Policy, 9: 5-28.
34. Trickey, H. (2000) ‘Comparing workfare programmes: features and implications’, pp. 249-294, in I. Loedemel and H. Trickey (eds), An offer you can’t refuse. Workfare in international perspective, Bristol: Policy Press.
35. Walker, R. and Wiseman, M. (2003) The Welfare We Want: The British Challenge for American Reform, Bristol: Policy Press.
36. World Bank (2007) Social Assistance in Central Europe and the Baltic States, Washington, DC: World Bank.
37. Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P. and Magnusson, L. (2005) The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, Brussels: PIE Peter Lang.