Shifting Agency: Agency, Kairos, and the Possibilities of Social Action

Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 133-153

  Herndl, Carl G ^a   Licona, Adela C ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85144352876     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315224954-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. (B. Brewster, Trans.) London: New Left Books.
2. Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands, la frontera: The new mestiza. San Francisco, CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3. Bakhtin, M. (1998). Discourse in the novel. In J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology (pp. 32-44). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
4. Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
5. Bordo, S. (1998). Material girl. In J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology (pp. 1099-1115). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
6. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
8. Burke, K. (1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
10. Campbell, K. K. (2003, September). Rhetorical agency. Paper presented at the conference of the Association of Rhetoric Societies, Evanston, IL.
11. Carter, M. (1988). Stasis and kairos: Principles of social construction in classical rhetoric. Rhetoric Review, 7(1), 97-113.
12. Clifford, J. (1991). The subject in discourse. In P. Harkin and J. Schlib (Eds.), Contending with words (pp. 38-51). New York: MLA.
13. Condit, C. (1997). In praise of eloquent diversity: Gender and rhetoric as public persuasion. Women’s Studies in Communication, 20, 91-116.
14. Condit, C. (1999). The character of “history” in rhetoric and cultural studies: Recoding genetics. In T. Rosteck (Ed.), At the intersection: Cultural studies and rhetorical studies (pp. 168-185). New York: The Guilford Press.
15. Davies, B. (1993). Shards of glass: Children reading and writing beyond gendered identities. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
16. de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
17. D’Souza, D. (1991). Illiberal education: The politics of race and sex on campus. New York: Free Press.
18. DuBois, W. E. B. (1998). The souls of black folk. In J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology (pp. 868-872). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
19. Ede, L., Glenn, C., and Lunsford, A. (1995). Border crossings: Intersections of rhetoric and feminism. Rhetorica, 13, 401-441.
20. Faber, B. (2002). Community action and organizational change: Image, narrative, identity. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon Books.
22. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777-795.
23. Gates, H. L. (1998). The blackness of blackness: A critique on the sign and the signifying monkey. In J. Rivkin and M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory: An anthology (pp. 903-922). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
24. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. Goankar, D. (1997). The idea of rhetoric in the rhetoric of science. In A. Gross and W. Keith (Eds.), Rhetorical hermeneutics: Invention and interpretation in the age of science (pp. 25-88). Albany: State University of New York Press.
26. Grossberg, L. (1992). We gotta get out of this place: Popular conservatism and post modern culture. New York: Routledge.
27. Habermas, J. (1970). Toward a theory of communicative competence. In H. Dreitzel (Ed.), Recent Sociology No. 2. (pp. 114-148). New York: Macmillan.
28. Hegde, R. S. (1998). A view from elsewhere: Locating difference and the politics of representation from a transnational feminist perspective. Communication Theory, 8, 271-297.
29. Henry, J. (2000). Writing workplace cultures: An archaeology of professional writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
30. Herndl, C., and Bauer, D. (2003). Speaking matters: Liberation theology, rhetorical performance, and social action. College, Composition and Communication, 54, 558-585.
31. Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.
32. Leach, E. R. (1962). On certain unconsidered aspects of double descent systems. Man, 62, 130-134.
33. Longo, B. (2000). Spurious coin: A history of science, management, and technical writing. Albany: State University of New York Press.
34. Mailloux, S. (2003). The role of rhetoric in the academy and beyond. Paper presented at the conference of the Association of Rhetoric Societies, Evanston, Illinois.
35. Messer-Davidow, E. (2002). Disciplining feminism: From social activism to academic discourse. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
36. Morris, M. (1990). Banality in cultural studies. In P. Mellencamp (Ed.), Logics of television: Essays in cultural criticism (pp. 14-43). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
37. Pérez, E. (1998). Irigaray’s female symbolic in the making of chicana sitios y lenguas (sites and discourses). In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living chicana theory (pp. 87-101). Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.
38. Pérez, E. (1999). The decolonial imaginary: Writing chicanas into history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
39. Poulakos, J. (1983). Toward a sophistic definition of rhetoric. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 16, 35-48.
40. Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed: Theory out of bounds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
41. Smith, P. (1988). Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
42. Sommers, C. H. (1994). Who stole feminism?: How women have betrayed women. New York: Simon and Schuster.
43. Spivak, G. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson and L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
44. Spivak, G. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Sullivan, P. A., and Porter, J. E. (1993). Remapping curricular geography: Professional writing in/and English. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 7, 389-422.
46. White, H. (1990). Tropics of discourse: Essays in cultural criticism. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
47. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.