Teen pregnancy and abuse of the Child Support Grant. Addressing the myths and stereotypes

Agenda

Volumn 17, Issue 56, 2003, Pages 79-83

  GOLDBLATT, BETH ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142902306     PISSN: 10130950     EISSN: 2158978X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10130950.2003.9676024     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Andersson, N, Roche, M and Mhatre, S. 2002. Gender Planning for Sustainable Development Johannesburg: CIET.
2. Berrick, J D. 1995. Faces of Poverty: Portraits of Women on Welfare Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE). 2000a. Phasing in the Child Support Grant—A Social Impact Study Johannesburg: CASE.
4. Community Agency for Social Enquiry (CASE). 2000b. Youth 2000: A Study of Youth in South Africa Johannesburg: CASE.
5. Committee of Inquiry into a Comprehensive System of Social Security for South Africa. 2002. Transforming the Present—Protecting the Future: Consolidated Report Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
6. Fraser, N and Gordon, L. 1994. ‘A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state’. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 19: 2
7. Liebenberg, S. 2001. ‘The right to social assistance: the implications of for policy reform in South Africa’. Grootboom SAJHR, 17 part 2.
8. Sogaula, N, van Niekerk, R, Noble, M, Green, C, Sigala, M, Samson, M, Sanders, D and Jackson, D. 2002. Social Security Transfers, Poverty and Chronic Illness in the Eastern Cape. An Investigation of the Relationship between Social Security Grants, the Alleviation of Rural Poverty and Chronic Illnesses (Including those Associated with HIV/AIDS): A Case Study of Mount Frere in the Eastern Cape, Economic Policy Research Unit and Social Disadvantage Research Centre, Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of Oxford and School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape
9. West, L P. 2002. ‘Soccer Moms, Welfare Queens, Waitress Moms, and Super Moms: myths of motherhood in state media coverage of child care’ MARIAL Centre, Emory University. Working Paper 16.