Formative Research Revealed: Methodological and Process Issues in Formative Research

“G” is for Growing: Thirty Years of Research on Children and Sesame Street

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 39-60

  Fisch, Shalom M ^a   Bernstein, Lewis ^a  

^a Children s Television Workshop   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142584899     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410605252-11     Document Type: Chapter

References (42)

1. Anderson, D. R., Lorch, E. P., Smith, R., Bradford, R., and Levin, S. (1981). Effects of peer presence on preschool children’s television viewing. Developmental Psychology, 17, 446-453.
2. Bernstein, L. (1977). Measuring the appeal ofchildren’s television: A review of research methods and findings (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
3. Big Bag New Mexico Research. (1995). Acquired materials: New Mexico study (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
4. Briggs, L. J., and Wager, W. W. (1981). Handbook of procedures for the design of instruction (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NT: Educational Technologies Publications.
5. Connell, D. D., and Palmer, E. L. (1971). Sesame Street: A case study. In J. D. Halloran and M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Broadcaster/researcher cooperation in mass communication research. Leeds, England: Kavanagh and Sons.
6. Cronbach, L. J. (1963). Course improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 64, 672-683.
7. Cronbach, L. J., Ambron, S. R., Dornbusch, S. M., Hess, R. D., Hornik, R. C., Philips, D. C., Walker, D. F., and Weiner, S. S. (1980). Toward reform of program evaluation: Aims, methods, and institutional arrangements. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cronbach, L. J., and Associates. (1983). Ninety-five theses for reforming program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
9. Dale, P. S. (1976). Language development: Structure and function (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
10. deVilliers, J. G., and deVilliers, P. A. (1978). Language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11. Dow, P. B. (1991). Schoolhouse politics: Lessons from the Sputnik era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Druin, A. (Ed.). (1999). The design of children’s technology. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman.
13. Eells, K. (1953). Some implications for school practice of the Chicago studies of cultural bias in intelligence tests. Harvard Educational Review, 23, 284-297.
14. Fisch, S. M. (1998). The Children’s Television Workshop: The experiment continues. In R. G. Noll and M. E. Price (Eds.), A communications cornucopia: Markle Foundation essays on information policy (pp. 297-337). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
15. Fisch, S. M., McCann, S. K., Body, K. E., and Cohen, D. I. (1993, April). Can formative research achieve reliability? In L. Martin andS.M. Fisch (Chairs), Meeting the challenges of formative research: Lessons from the Children’s Television Workshop. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
16. Flagg, B. N. (Ed.). (1990). Formative evaluation for educational technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Higgins, N., and Sullivan, H. (Eds.). (1990). Children’s learning from television: Research and development at the Children’s Television Workshop [Special issue]. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(4).
18. Huston, A. C., and Wright, J. C. (1997). Mass media and children’s development. In W Damon, I. Sigel, and A. Rennings (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4). New York: Wiley.
19. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. (1981). Standards for evaluation of educational programs, projects, and materials. New York: McGraw Hill.
20. Land, H. W (1972). The Children’s Television Workshop: How and why it works. Jericho, NY: Nassau Board of Cooperative Educational Services.
21. Lesser, G. S. (1974). Children and television: Lessons from Sesame Street. New York: Vintage Books/Random House.
22. Mielke, K. W (1983). The educational use of production variables and formative research in programming. In M. Meyer (Ed.), Children and the formal features of television. Munchen, Germany: Saur.
23. Mielke, K. W (1990). Research and development at the Children’s Television Workshop. Educational Technology Research and Development, 35(4), 7-16.
24. Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation. In R. Tyler, R. Gagné, and M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (pp. 39-83). Chicago: Rand McNally.
25. Scriven, M. (1993). Hard-won lessons in program evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 58, 1-101.
26. Sesame Street Research. (1990). Sesame Street females: The facts (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
27. Sesame Street Research. (1995). The Muppet study, 1995 (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
28. Sesame Street Research. (1997). What do preschoolers know about space! (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
29. Sesame Street Research. (1998a). Muppet and child character appeal study (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
30. Sesame Street Research. (1998b). Elmo’s World: Assessing the appeal and comprehension of the Ball episode (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
31. Sesame Street Research. (1998c). Elmo’s World “Shoes”: Assessing the appeal, engagement, and comprehension (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
32. Sesame Street Research. (1998d). Elmo’s World “Hats”: Assessing the appeal, engagement, and comprehension (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
33. Sesame Street Research. (1998e). Elmo’s World “Balls”: Assessing the appeal, engagement, and comprehension among first-time and repeat viewers (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
34. Sesame Street Research. (1999). Elmo’s World “Dancing”: Assessing the appeal, engagement, and comprehension of repeat viewers over three consecutive days (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
35. Sesame Street Research and Applied Research and Consulting (1998). Sesame Street letters and numbers cluster study (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
36. Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Bantam/Vintage.
37. Stalford, C. B. (1985). Reflections on writing a clear evaluation summary. Evaluation News, 6(4), 10-16.
38. Smith, M. L., and Glass, G. V. (1987). Research and evaluation in education and the social sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
39. Stufflebeam, D. L. (1983). The CIPP model for program evaluation. In G. F. Madaus, M. Scriven, and D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
40. Stufflebeam, D. L., and Webster, W J. (1980). An analysis of alternative approaches to evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 3(2), 5-19.
41. Tessier, B. (1996). Sesame Street brand survey results, 1995-1996 (unpublished research report). New York: Children’s Television Workshop.
42. Weston, C., McAlpine, L., and Bordonaro, T. (1995). A model for understanding formative evaluation in instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(3), 29-48.