Negotiations of Thematic Conversations About Biology

Learning Conversations in Museums

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 357-400

  Ash, Doris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85142547452     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410606624-18     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Ash, D. (1995). From functional reasoning to an adaptationist stance: Children’s transition toward deep biology. Unpublished thesis. University of California, Berkeley.
2. Ash, D. (1999). The process skills of inquiry. Inquiry, Foundations (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: NSF.
3. Ash, D. (2000, April). Social negotiation of life sciences thematic content in family talk:Mapping design principles form community of learners classroom research to museums. Paper presented at the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans.
4. Ash, D., and Brown, A.L. (1996, April). Thematic continuities guide shifts in biological reasoning: Children’s transition towards deep principles of evolution. Paper presented at AERA, New York. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5. Ash, D., Campione, J.C., and Brown, A.L. (1995, April). Measuring children’s shift toward adaptationist reasoning: The guided clinical interview. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
6. Ash, D., and Klein, C. (2000). Inquiry in the informal learning environment. In J.Minstrell and E. Van Zee (Eds.), Teaching and learning in an inquiry-based classroom (pp. 215-240). Washington, DC: AAAS.
7. Ash, D., Ostrenko, M., Steier, F., and Borun, M. (2000, August). Analyzing inquiry through visitor conversation. Symposium at Visitor Studies Association, Boston.
8. Bakhtin, M.M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.
9. Bates, M. (1950). The nature of natural history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10. Bransford, J.D., Declos, V.R., Vye, N.J., Burns, M.S., and Hasselbring, T.S. (1987). Approaches to dynamic assessment: Issues, data and future directions. In C.S.Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: Foundations and fundamentals. New York: Guilford Press.
11. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodical challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
12. Brown, A.L., Ash, D., Rutherford, M., Nakagawa, K., Gordon A., and Campione, J.C. (1993). Distributed expertise in the classroom. In G.Salomon (Ed.), Distributed Cognitions (pp. 188-228). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Brown, A.L., and Campione, J.C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Brown, A.L., and Campione, J.C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L.Schauble and R.Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning (pp. 289-325). Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Brown, A.L., Campione, J., Metz, K., and Ash, D. (1996). The development of science learning abilities in children. In A.Burgen and K.Harnquist (Eds.), Growing up with science:Developing early understanding of science (pp. 156-178). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
16. Brown, A.L., Ellery, S., and Campione, J.C. (1997). Creating zones of proximal development electronically. In J.Green and S.Goldman (Eds.), Thinking practices in math and science education (pp. 149-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Brown, A.L., and Reeve, R.A. (1987). Bandwidths of competence: The role of supportive contexts in learning and development. In L.S.Liben (Ed.), Development and learning:Conflict or congruence? (pp. 173-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books.
19. Crowley, K., and Callanan, M. (1998). Describing and supporting collaborative scientific thinking in parent-child interactions. Journal of Museum Education, 23(1), 12-20.
20. Edwards, D., and Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge: The development of understanding in the classroom. London: Routledge.
21. Eldredge, N. (1985). Unfinished synthesis: Biological hierarchies and modern evolutionary thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Eldredge, N. (1991). Santa Rosalia: Or why there are some many different species. In The miner’s canary: Unraveling the mysteries of extinction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23. Could, S.J. (1991). Bully for Brontosaurus. New York: W.W. Norton.
24. Gould, S.J., and Lewontin, B.C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marcos and the panglossian paradigm. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B: Biological Sciences, 205 (pp. 582-598).
25. Halliday, M.A.K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93-116.
26. Inagaki, K., and Sugiyama, K. (1988). Attributing human characteristics Developmental changes in over-and underattribution. Cognitive Development, 3, 55-70.
27. Keil, F. (1992). The origins of autonomous biology. In M.R.Gunman and M.Marasotos (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Modularity and constraints on language and cognition, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Leinhardt, G., and Crowley, K. (1998). Museum learning as conversational elaboration: A proposal to capture, code and analyze museum talk (pp. 115-142). Museum Learning Collaborative (Tech. Rep. # MLC-01). http://mlc.lrdc.pitt/mld
29. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
30. Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J.V.Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 37-71). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
31. Mayr, E. (1988). Is there an autonomous biology? In Toward a new philosophy of biology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
32. Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Moschkovich, J. (1989, April). Constructing a problem space through appropriation: A case study of tutoring during computer exploration. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
34. Newman, D., Griffin, P., and Cole, M. (1989). The construction zone. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
35. Nystrand, M. (1997). Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
36. Palincsar, A.M., Brown, A.L., and Campione, J. (1987). Dynamic assessment. In L.Swanson (Ed.), Handbook on the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 115-142). Austin, Texas:Pro-ed.
37. Paris, S., and Ash, D. (2002). Reciprocal theory building inside and outside museums. Curator.
38. Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In J.V.Wertsch, P.del Rio, and A.Alvarez (Eds.), Socio studies of mind (pp. 139-164). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Schauble, L., and Bartlett, K. (1997). Constructing a science gallery for children and families:The role of research in an innovative design process. Science Education (Informal Science Education-Special Issue) 81(6), 781-793.
40. Sinclair, J.McH., and Coulthard, M.C. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.
41. Springer, K., and Keil, F.C. (1991). Early differentiation of causal mechanisms appropriate to biological and non-biological kinds. Child Development.
42. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Wells, G. (1997). A sociocultural perspective on classroom discourse: Appendix A, Coding scheme for the analysis of classroom discourse. In B.Davies and D.Corson (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Education, Vol. 3. Oral discourse and education (pp. 3-5). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer Academic Publishers, (with E.Measures and C.Quell).
44. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices of the mind. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. White, B.Y. (1989, December). The role of intermediate abstractions in understanding science and mathematics. Eleventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Society, University of Michigan.
47. White, B. (1993). Intermediate causal models: A missing link for successful science education. In R.Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.