JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION

International Organizations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 219-240

  Charnovitz, Steve ^a  

^a WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85141057197     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9789004479227_014     Document Type: Chapter

References (55)

1. Frieder Roessler, The Institutional Balance Between the Judicial and Political Organs of the WTO, in New Directions in International Economic Law. Essays in Hon­our of John H. Jackson 325 (Marco Bronckers & Reinhard Quick eds., 2000)
2. Raj Bhala, The Power of the Past: Toward De Jure Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part III of a Trilogy), 33 George Washington International Law Review 968 (2001)
3. David Palmeter, The WTO as a Legal System, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 444, 471 (2000)
4. Arnold D. McNair, International Legislation, 19 Iowa Law Review, 177, 184 (1933-34).
5. David P. Currie, Separating Judicial Power, 61 Law and Contemporary Problems, Summer 1998, at 7, 8
6. Montesquieu, The Spirit of Laws 202 (David Wallace Carrithers ed., 1977)
7. Gordon S. Wood, The Creadon of the American Republic, 1776-1787, at 152-53, 161, 453-463, 547-53 (1969).
8. Manley O. Hudson, International Tribunals, Past and Future 20, 25 (1944).
9. Manley O. Hudson, The First Year of the Permanent Court of International Justice, 17 American Journal of International Law 15, 19-20 (1923).
10. Elihu Lauterpacht, Judicial Review of the Acts of International Organisations, in International Law, The International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons 92 (Laurence Boisson de Chazournes & Philippe Sands eds., 1999).
11. William Adams Brown, Jr., The United States and the Restoration of World Trade 177, 233, 401 (1950).
12. Giorgio Sacerdoti, Appeal and Judicial Review in International Arbitration and Adjudication: The Case of the WTO Appellate Body, in International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System 247, 254 (Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann ed., 1997).
13. J.H.H. Weiler, The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats—Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement, 35 Journal of World Trade 191, 200-01 (2001).
14. Arie Reich, From Diplomacy to Law: The Judicialization of International Trade Relations, 17 Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 775 (1997)
15. David Palmeter & Petros C. Mavroidis, The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law, 92 American Journal of Interna­tional Law 398, 405 (1998)
16. Judith Goldstein & Lisa L. Martin, Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note, 54 International Organization 603 (2000).
17. Peter D. Ehrenhaft, The ‘Judicialization” of Trade Law, 56 Notre Dame Lawyer 595 (1981).
18. Frieder Roessler, Are the WTO’s Judicial Organs Overburdened, in Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium 308, 325 (Roger B. Porter, Pierre Sauvé, Arvind Subramanian & Americo Beviglia-Zampetti eds., 2001).
19. José Alvarez, How Not to Link: Institutional Conundrums of an Expanded Trade Regime. 7 Widener Law Symposium Journal 1, 19 (2001).
20. Joost Pauwelyn, The Use of Experts in WTO Dispute Settlement, 51 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 325, 338 (2002).
21. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, Dispute Settlement in International Economic Law— Lessons for Strengthening International Economic Dispute Settlement in Non-Economic Areas, 2 Journal of International Economic Law 189, 209 (1999).
22. Hirokazu Miyano, Diversification of International Dispute Settlement Systems—Lts Implication for the Concept of Dispute and its Settlement, 104 Chuo Law Review, Aug. 1998, at 1, 11
23. William J. Davey, WTO Dispute Settlement: Segregating the Useful Political Aspects and Avoiding “Over-Legalization, ” in New Directions in International Economic Law, supra note 1, at 291, 297
24. Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System 1948-1996: An Introduction, in International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System, supra note 26, at 3, 64
25. Deborah Z. Cass, The “Constitutionalization” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade, 12 European Journal of International Law 39, 44 (2001).
26. Robert O. Keohane, Andrew Moravcsik & Anne-Marie Slaughter, Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational, 54 International Organization 457, 459—60 (2000).
27. Laurence R. Helfer & Anne-Marie Slaughter, Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication, 107 Yale Law Journal 273, 303 (1997).
28. Florentino P. Feliciano & Peter L. H. Van den Bossche, The Dispute Settlement System of the World Trade Organization: Institutions, Process and Practice, IS Philippine Law Journal 1, 30-31 (2000)
29. Robert Howse, Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence, in The EU, The WTO and the NAFTA 35, 49-50 (J. H. H. Weiler ed., 2000)
30. Philip M. Nichols, GATT Doctrine, 36 Virginia Journal of International Law 379, 454 n. 429 (1996).
31. Jan Tumlir, GATT Rules and Community Law—A Comparison of Economic and Legal Functions, in The European Community and GATT 1, 10 (Meinhard Hilf, Francis G. Jacobs, and Ernst-Ulrich Petersmann, eds. 1986).
32. Konstantin J. Joergens, True Appellate Procedure or Only a Two-Stage Process? A Comparative View of the Appellate Body under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding 30 Law & Policy in Inter­national Business 193, 197, 213, 228 (1999)
33. Jeffrey Atik, Democratizing the WTO, 33 George Washington International Law Review 451, 454 (2001)
34. William J. Davey, Comment, in Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multi­lateral Trading System at the Millennium, supra note 55, at 329, 331
35. B. S. Chimni, WTO and Environment: Legitimisation of Unilateral Trade Sanctions. SI Economic & Political Weekly 133 (2002)
36. Donald M. McRae, GATT Article XX and the WTO Appellate Body, in New Directions in International Economic Law, supra note 1, at 219.
37. Jagdish Bhagwati, After Seattle: Free Trade and the WTO, in Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, supra note 55, at 50, 60-61.
38. Laurence Boisson de Chazournes, Advisory Opinions and the Furtherance of Common Interests of Humankind, in This Volume Mitsuo Matsushita & Douglas E. Rosenthal, Was the WTO Mistaken in Ruling on Antidumping Act of 19161 36 BNA International Trade Reporter 1450 (2001).
39. Claude E. Barfield, Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy. The Future of the World Trade Organization 5 (2001).
40. Daniel Bodansky, Non Liquet and the Incompleteness of International Law, in International Law, The International Court of Justice and Nuclear Weapons, supra note 16, at 153.
41. Jacques H. F. Bourgeois, WTO Dispute Settlement in the Field of Antidumping Law, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 259, 271-72 (1998)
42. William J. Davey, Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System ExceededLts Authority?, 4 Journal of International Economic Law 79, 106 (2001).
43. Alan WM. Wolff, Problems with WTO Dispute Settlement, 2 Chicago Journal of International Law 417, 424 (2001).
44. Robert Howse, The Legitimacy of the World Trade Organization, in The Legitimacy of International Organizations 355, 381
45. Marco C. E. J. Bronckers & John H. Jackson, Editorial Comment: Outside Counsel in WTO Dispute Processes, 2 Journal of International Economic Law 156 (1999).
46. Geert A. Zonnekeyn, The Appellate Bodys Communication on “Amicus Curiae” Briefs in the “Asbestos” Case. An Echternach Procession?, 33 Journal of World Trade 553 (2001).
47. Judges and Legislators. Toward Institutional Comity (Robert A. Katzmann ed., 1988).
48. José E. Alvarez, Judging the Security Council, 90 American Journal of Interna­tional Law 1, 39 (1996)
49. Padideh Ala’i, Judicial Lobbying at the WTO: The Debate Over the Use of Amicus Curiae Briefs and the U.S. Experience, 24 Fordham International Law Journal 62 (2000);
50. Andrea Kupfer Schneider, Unfriendly Actions: The Amicus Brief Battle at the WTO, 7 Widener Law Sympo­sium Journal 87 (2001).
51. Daniel Pruzin, WTO Appellate Body Under Fire for Move on Acceptance of Amicus Briefs, BNA Daily Report for Executives, 27 November 2000, at Al.
52. Robert O. Keohane & Joseph S. Nye, Jr., The Club Model of Multilateral Cooperation and Problems of Democratic Legitimacy, in Efficiency, Equity, and Legitimacy: The Multilateral Trading System at the Millennium, supra note 55, at 264, 275.
53. Patrick M. Norton, A Law of the Future or a Law of the Past? Modern Tribunals and the International Law of Expropriation, 85 American Journal of International Law 474, 505 (1991).
54. Steve Charnovitz, The Legal Status of the Doha Declaration, 5 Journal of International Economic Law 207 (2002).
55. W. Michael Reisman, The Constitutional Crisis in the United Nations, 87 American Jour­nal of International Law 83, 96 (1993).