ECOLOGICAL ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOACOUSTICS AND AUDITORY DISPLAYS: HEARING, GROUPING, AND MEANING MAKING

Ecological Psychoacoustics

Volumn , Issue , 2021, Pages 149-174

  Walker, Bruce N ^a   Kramer, Gregory ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Metta Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139706158     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1163/9780080477442_009     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Astheimer, P. (1993). Realtime sonification to enhance the human-computer interaction in virtual worlds. Proceedings of the Fourth Eurographics Workshop on Visualization in Scientific Computing, Abingdon, England.
2. Ballas, J. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 250--267.
3. Ballas, J. A. (1994). Delivery of information through sound. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory inteifaces (pp. 79-94). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4. Barrass, S. (1997). Auditory information design. Unpublished dissertation, Australian National University.
5. Bertin, J. (1981). Graphics and graphic information processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
6. Blattner, M. M., Sumikawa, D. A., & Greenberg, R. M. (1989). Earcons and icons: Their structure and common design principles. Human-Computer Interaction, 4, 11-44.
7. Bly, S. (1982). Sound and computer information presentation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis.
8. Bonebright, T. (2001). Perceptual structure of everyday sounds: A multidimensional scaling approach. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 73-78), Espoo, Finland.
9. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Brungart, D. S., Ericson, M. A., & Simpson, B. D. (2002). Design considerations for improving the effectiveness of multitalker speech displays. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 424-430), Kyoto, Japan.
11. Carlile, S., Leong, P., & Hyams, S. (1997). The nature and distribution of errors in sound localization by human listeners. Hearing Research, 114, 79-196.
12. Dombois, F. (2001). Using audification in planetary seismology. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 227-230), Espoo, Finland.
13. Dombois, F. (2002). Auditory seismology-On free oscillations, focal mechanisms, explosions, and synthetic seismograms. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 27-30), Kyoto, Japan.
14. Earl, C., & Leventhal, J. A. (1999). Survey of Windows screen reader users: Recent improvements in accessibility. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 93(3), 174-177.
15. Edworthy, J., Loxley, S., & Dennis, I. (1991). Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors, 33, 205-232.
16. Egan, J., Carterette, E., & Thwing, E. (1954). Some factors affecting multichannel listening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 774--782.
17. Fitch, W. T., & Kramer, G. (1994). Sonifying the body electric: Superiority of an auditory over a visual display in a complex, multi-variate system. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 307-326). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Fletcher, H. (1940). Auditory patterns. Reviews of Modern Physics, 12, 47--65.
19. Fletcher, H., & Munson, W. A. (1933). Loudness: Its definition, measurement, and calculation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 5, 82-88.
20. Flowers, J. H., & Grafel, D. C. (2002). Perception of sonified daily weather records. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, Maryland.
21. Garner, W. R. (1974). Processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Gaver, W. W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), 67-94.
23. Gaver, W. W. (1994). Using and creating auditory icons. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 417-446). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
24. Gaver, W. W., Smith, R. B., & O' Shea, T. (1991). Effective sounds in complex systems: The ARKoia simulation. Proceedings of the CH1'91, New York.
25. Gittins, D. (1986). Icon-based human-computer interaction. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 24, 519-543.
26. Guillaume, A., Drake, C., Rivenez, M., Pellieux, L., & Chastres, V. (2002). Perception of urgency and alarm design. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 357-361), Kyoto, Japan.
27. Hartmann, W. M. (1997). Sounds, signals, and sensation: Modern acoustics and signal processing. New York: Springer Verlag.
28. Hayward, C. (1994). Listening to the earth sing. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 369-404). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29. Hellier, E. J., Edworthy, J., & Dennis, I. (1993). Improving auditory warning design: Quantifying and predicting the effects of different warning parameters on perceived urgency. Human Factors, 35, 693-706.
30. Hemenway, K. (1982). Psychological issues in the use of icons in command menus. Proceedings of the CHl'82 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 21-24), New York.
31. Howard, J. H., & Ballas, J. A. (1982). Acquisition of acoustic pattern categories by exemplar observation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 30, 157-173.
32. ISO (1987). Acoustics-Normal equal-loudness level contours (No. ISO 226:1987). Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
33. Kolers, P. (1969). Some formal characteristics of pictograms. American Scientist, 57, 348-363.
34. Kramer, G. (1993). Sonification of Financial Data: An Overview of Spreadsheet and Database Sonification. Proceedings of the Virtual Reality Systems '93, New York.
35. Kramer, G. (l994a). An introduction to auditory display. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 1-78). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
36. Kramer, G. (1994b). Some organizing principles for representing data with sound. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonification, audification, and auditory interfaces (pp. 185-222). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
37. Kramer, G. (1996). Mapping a single data stream to multiple auditory variables: A subjective approach to creating a compelling design. Paper presented at the International Conference on Auditory Display, Palo Alto, CA.
38. Kramer, G., & Ellison, S. (1991). Audification: The use of sound to display multivariate data. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference (pp. 214--221), San Francisco.
39. Kramer, G., Walker, B. N., Bonebright, T., Cook, P., Flowers, J., Miner, N., et al. (1999). The Sonification Report: Status of the Field and Research Agenda. Report prepared for the National Science Foundation by members of the International Community for Auditory Display. Santa Fe, NM: International Community for Auditory Display (ICAD).
40. Licklider, J. C. R. (1951). Basic correlates of the auditory stimulus. In S. S. Stevens (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 985-1039). New York: Wiley.
41. Licklider, J. C. R. (1956). Auditory frequency analysis. In C. Cherry (Ed.), Information theory (pp. 253-268). New York: Academic Press.
42. Martins, A. C. G., & Rangayyan, R. M. (1997). Experimental evaluation of auditory display and sonification of textured images. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD97) (pp. 129-134), Palo Alto, CA.
43. McAdams, S., & Bigand, E. (Eds.). (1993). Thinking in sound: The cognitive psychology of human audition. New York: Clarendon Press.
44. McKinley, R. L., & Ericson, M. A. (1992). Minimum audible angles for synthesized localization cues presented over headphones. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 2297.
45. Middlebrooks, J. c., & Green, D. M. (1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 135-159.
46. Mills, A. W. (1958). On the minimum audible angle. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 237-246.
47. Moore, B. C. J. (1989). An introduction to the psychology of hearing. London: Academic Press.
48. Mowbry, G. H., & Gebhard, J. W. (1961). Man's senses as informational channels. In H. W. Sinaiko (Ed.), Human factors in the design and use of control systems (pp. 115-149). New York: Dover.
49. Nagel, K., Kidd, C. C., O'Connell, T., Dey, A., & Abowd, G. D. (2001). The family intercom: Developing a context-aware audio communication system. Proceedings of the Ubicomp 2001 (pp. 176-183), Atlanta GA.
50. Neuhoff, J., & McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 970-985.
51. OSHA (1981). OSHA Standard 1910.95: Occupational noise exposure: Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
52. Ossner, J. (1990). Transnational Symbols: The rule of pictograms and models in the learning process. In J. Nielsen (Ed.), Designing user interfaces for international use (pp. 11-38). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
53. Patterson, R. D. (1982). Guidelines for auditory warning systems on civil aircraft. London: Civil Aviation Authority.
54. Pereverzev, S. v., Loshak, A., Backhaus, S., Davis, J. c., & Packard, R. E. (1997). Quantum oscillations between two weakly coupled reservoirs of super fluid 3He. Nature, 388, 449-45l.
55. Pollack, I., & Ficks, L. (1954). Information of elementary multidimensional auditory displays. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 155-158.
56. Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North Holland.
57. Resnick, S. B., & Feth, L. L. (1975). Discriminability of time-reversed click pairs: Intensity effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 57, 1493-1499.
58. Robinson, D. W., & Dadson, R. S. (1956). A re-determination of the equal-loudness relations for pure tones. British Journal of Applied Physics, 7, 166-18l.
59. Salvendy, G. (1997). Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
60. Sanders, M. S., & McCormick, E. J. (1993). Humanfactors in engineering and design (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
61. Scarf, F. L. (1979). Possible traversals of Jupiter's distant magnetic tail by Voyager and by Saturn. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, 4422.
62. Schiffman, H. R., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. L. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling. New York: Academic Press.
63. Schouten, J. F. (1940). The residue and the mechanism of hearing. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie Van Wetenschappen, 43, 991-999.
64. Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computerinteraction (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley Longman.
65. Smith, D. R., & Walker, B. N. (2002, 2-5 July). Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 362-367), Kyoto, Japan.
66. Sorkin, R. D. (1987). Design of auditory and tactile displays. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors (pp. 549-576). New York: Wiley.
67. Speeth, S. D. (1961). Seismometer sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 33, 909-916.
68. Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects. New York: Wiley.
69. Treisman, A. (1964). The effects of irrelevant material on the efficiency of selective listening. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 533-546.
70. Uzilevsky, G., & Andreev, V. (1993). Iconic signs and languages in user interface development. In L. J. Bass, J. Gomostaev, and C. Unger (Eds.), Human-computer interaction. Selected papers from Third International Conference, EWHCI'93 (pp. 115-124). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
71. Valenzuela, M. L., Sansalone, M. J., Krumhansl, C. L., & Streett, W. B. (1997). Use of sound for the interpretation of impact-echo signals. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD97) (pp. 47-56), Palo Alto, CA.
72. Walker, A., & Brewster, S. (2001). "Sitting too close to the screen can be bad for your ears": A study of audio-visual location discrepancy detection under different visual projections. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 86-89), Espoo, Finland.
73. Walker, B. N. (2000). Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Rice University, Houston, TX.
74. Walker, B. N. (2002). Magnitude estimation of conceptual data dimensions for use in sonification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8, 211-22l.
75. Walker, B. N., & Ehrenstein, A. (2000). Pitch and pitch change interact in auditory displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 15-30.
76. Walker, B. N., & Kramer, G. (l996a). Human factors and the acoustic ecology: Considerations for multimedia audio design. Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society JOIst Convention, Los Angeles.
77. Walker, B. N., & Kramer, G. (l996b). Mappings and metaphors in auditory displays: An experimental assessment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD96) (pp. 71-74), Palo Alto, CA.
78. Walker, B. N., & Lane, D. M. (2001). Psychophysical scaling of sonification mappings: A comparision of visually impaired and sighted listeners. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 90-94), Espoo, Finland.
79. Wenzel, E. M. (1994). Spatial sound and sonification. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory display: Sonijication, audijication, and auditory interfaces (pp. 127-150). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
80. Zacharov, N., & Koivuniemi, K. (2001). Audio descriptive analysis and mapping of spatial sound displays. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Auditory Display (pp. 95-104), Espoo, Finland.
81. Zwicker, E., & Scharf, B. (1965). A model of loudness summation. Psychological Review, 72, 3-26.