Issues in the teaching and learning of geometry

Aspects of Teaching Secondary Mathematics: Perspectives on Practice

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 121-139

  Jones, Keith ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85139696662     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203165874-14     Document Type: Chapter

References (9)

1. Clements, D. (2000) ‘Teaching and learning geometry’ in Kilparick, J. (ed.) Research Companion to the NCTM Standards for Mathematics, Reston, VA: NCTM.
2. de Villiers, M. (1999) Rethinking Proof with Geometer’s Sketchpad, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
3. Hoyles, C. and Jones, K. (1998) ‘Proof in dynamic geometry contexts’ in C. Mammana and V. Villani (eds) Perspectives on the Teaching of Geometry for the 21st Century, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
4. Jones, K. (1999) ‘Students’ interpretations of a dynamic geometry environment’ in I. Schwank (ed.) European Research in Mathematics Education, Osnabrück: Forschungsinstitut für Mathematikdidaktik.
5. Malkevitch, J. (ed.) (1991) Geometry’s Future, Arlington, MA: COMAP.
6. Mathematical Association (1993) Geometry in the Undergraduate Syllabus: Report from Group III, mathematical content at university, Leicester: Mathematical Association.
7. Royal Society/Joint Mathematical Council (2001) On Geometry Education Teaching and Learning pre-19, London: Royal Society/Joint Mathematical Council.
8. Whitely, W. (1999) ‘The decline and rise of geometry in 20th century North America’, Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Mathematics Education Study Group of Canada, St. Catharines, Ontario: Brock University.
9. Willson, W.W. (1977) The Mathematics Curriculum: Geometry, Glasgow: Blackie/Schools Council.