Information Selection in Noisy Environments with Large Action Spaces

Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1622-1627

  Tsividis, Pedro ^a   Gershman, Samuel J ^a   Tenenbaum, Joshua B ^a   Schulz, Laura ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

active learning; exploration; information gain; information search

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; QUERY PROCESSING; SEARCH ENGINES;

ACTION SPACES; ACTIVE LEARNING; HUMAN COGNITION; INFORMATION GAIN; INFORMATION SEARCH; INFORMATION SELECTION; NOISY ENVIRONMENT; REAL-WORLD; SEARCH GAMES; SIMPLE INFORMATIONS;

RELIABILITY;

EID: 85139228126     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Markant, D., & Gureckis, T. (2012). Does the utility of information influence sampling behavior? In Proceedings of the 34th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 719-724). Austin, TX.
2. Navarro, D. J., & Perfors, A. F. (2011). Hypothesis generation, sparse categories, and the positive test strategy. Psychological Review, 118, 120-134.
3. Nelson, J. D., Divjak, B., Gudmunsdottir, G., Martignon, L. F., & Meder, B. (2013). Children's sequential information search is sensitive to environmental probabilities. Cognition, 130, 74-80.
4. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (1994). A rational analysis of the selection task as optimal data selection. Psychological Review, 101.
5. Stephan, K., Penny, W., Daunizeau, J., Moran, R. J., & Friston, K. J. (2009). Bayesian model selection for group studies. Neuroimage, 46, 1004-1017.
6. Wason, P. (1968). Reasoning about a rule. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 20, 273-281.