DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT TO STUDY THE USE OF RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMS

9th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 269-279

  Beyah, Gayle ^a   Xu, Peng ^a   Woo, Han G ^a   Mohan, Kannan ^a   Straub, Detmar ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

assessment of e commerce systems; e commerce recommendation systems; Instrument development; technology acceptance model

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC COMMERCE;

ASSESSMENT OF E-COMMERCE SYSTEM; COLLABORATIVE RECOMMENDATION; CONTENT-BASED RECOMMENDATION; E-COMMERCE RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM; E-COMMERCE RECOMMENDATIONS; E-COMMERCE SYSTEMS; INSTRUMENT DEVELOPMENT; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; WEB BASED;

RECOMMENDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 85139106253     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R., and Todd, P.A. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: a Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), June 1992, pp. 227-247.
2. Balabanovic, M. and Shoham, Y. “Fab: Content-Based, Collaborative Recommendation,” Communications of the ACM (40:3), March 1997, pp. 66-72.
3. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. “The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Uses as an Illustration,” Technology Studies (2:2), 1995, pp. 285-309.
4. Boudreau, M.-C., Gefen, D., and Straub, D.W. “Validation in Information Systems Research: A State-of-the-Art Assessment,” MIS Quarterly (25:1), March 2001, pp. 1-16.
5. Calder, B.J., Phillips, L.W., and Tybout, A.M. “Designing Research for Application,” Journal of Consumer Research (8), 1981, pp. 197-207.
6. Carmine, E. and Zeller, R. “Reliability and Validity Assessment,” In Sage Paper Series on Quantitative Applications No. 07-017, Sage Publications Inc., Beverly Hills, CA, 1979.
7. Chau, P.Y.K. “An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems (13:2), Fall 1996, pp. 185-204.
8. Churchill, G.A. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research (16), 1979, pp. 64-73.
9. Davis, F.D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), September 1989, pp. 319-340.
10. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), August 1989, pp. 982-1003.
11. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. “Information Systems Success: the Quest for the Dependent Variable,” Information Systems Research (3:1), March 1992, pp. 60-95.
12. Dobson, S.O. “Information Overload from the Web,” Broker World (19), 1999, pp. 108-110.
13. Fishbein, M. and Azjen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, ed., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.
14. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variable and Measurement Error,” Journal of Marketing Research (18), 1981, pp. 39-50.
15. Gefen, D. and Straub, D.W. “Gender Difference in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly (21:4), December 1997, pp. 389-400.
16. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., and Boudreau, M.-C. “Structural Equation Modeling Techniques and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice,” Communications of the AIS (4:7), October 2000, pp. 1-78.
17. Giffin, K. “The Contribution of Studies of Source Credibility to a Theory of Interpersonal Trust in the Communication Process,” Psychological Bulletin (168), 1967.
18. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., and Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1995.
19. Hanover, D. “Big Names Add Clout to Web,” Chain Store Age (74:8), 1998.
20. Lagace, R. and Gassenheimer, G. “Exploratory Study of Trust and Suspicion toward Salespeople,” In American Marketing Association Proceedings, 1991.
21. Lederer, A.L., Maupin, D.J., Sena, M.P., and Zhuang, Y. “The Technology Acceptance Model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support Systems (29:3), 2000, pp. 269-282.
22. Mathieson, K. “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research (2:3), September 1991, pp. 173-191.
23. McAllister, D.J. “Affect and Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations,” Academy of Management Journal (38:1), February 1995, pp. 24-59.
24. Mooney, R.J. and Roy, L. “Content-Based Book Recommending Using Learning for Text Categorization,” Proceedings of the IGIR: Workshop on Recommender Systems, Algorithms and Evaluation, 1999.
25. Morris, M.G. and Dillon, A. “How User Perceptions Influence Software Use,” IEEE Software (14:4), July 1997, pp. 58-65.
26. Nunally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1994.
27. Rieh, S.Y. “Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority in the Web,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (53:2), January 2002, pp. 145-161.
28. Rucker, J. and Polanco, M.J. “Siteseer: Personalized Navigation for the Web,” Communications of the ACM (40:3), March 1997, pp. 73-76.
29. Schafer, J.B., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J. “Recommender Systems in E-Commerce,” E-Commerce (99), 1999.
30. Stenmark, D. “Capturing Tacit Knowledge using Recommender Systems,” Proceedings of the IRIS22, Department of CS/IS, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, 1999.
31. Straub, D.W. “Validating Instruments in IS Research,” MIS Quarterly (13:2), June 1989, pp. 147-169.
32. Straub, D.W., Limayem, M., and Karahanna-Evaristo, E. “Measuring System Usage: Implications for IS Theory Testing,” Management Science (41:8), August 1995, pp. 1328-1342.
33. Tan, M. and Teo, T.S.H. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking,” Journal of the AIS (1:5), July 2000, pp. 1-42.
34. Venaik, S., Midgley, D.F., and Devinney, T.M. “Autonomy, Networking, and Interunit Learning in a Model of MNC Subsidiary Innovation and Performance,” http://www.agsm.unsw.edu.au/~timdev/research/vmd.pdf, 2001.
35. Volkov, V. Personalized Content Aggregation at Web Portals: Tailoring the Content Bundle Based on Content Provider's Credibility, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 1999.