Location-Based Mobile Decision Support Systems and Their Effect On User Performance

10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 2870-2874

  Basole, Rahul C ^a   Chao, Raul O ^b  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Location Technologies; Mobile Decision Support Systems; Technology Design; User Performance

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; LOCATION;

DECISION SUPPORTS; INFORMATION ACCESS; LOCATION BASED; LOCATION TECHNOLOGY; MOBILE DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; SUPPORT UTILITY; TECHNOLOGY DESIGNS; UBIQUITOUS INFORMATION; USER PERFORMANCE; WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 85139044863     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Bhargava, H., and Power, D. (2001) Decision Support Systems and Web Technologies: A Status Report, Proceedings of the 2001 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Boston, MA.
2. Daft R.L., Lengel, R.H., and Trevino, L. (1987) Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems, MIS Quarterly, 355-366.
3. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models, Management Science, 35, 8, 982-1003.
4. DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. (1992) Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable, Information Systems Research,3, 1, 60-95.
5. Dennis, A.R. and Kinney, S.T. (1998) Testing media richness theory in the new media: the effects of cues, feedback and task equivocality, Information Systems Research, 9, 3, 256-274.
6. Dishaw, M.T. and Strong, D.M. (1999) Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs, Information and Management, 36, 1, 9-21.
7. Goodhue, D.L. (1995) Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems, Management Science, 41, 12, 1827-1844.
8. Goodhue, D.L. and Thompson, R.L. (1995) Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance, MIS Quarterly, 19, 2, 213-236.
9. Mennecke, B.E. and Strader, T. J. (2001) Where in the World on the Web Does Location Matter? A Framework for Location Based Services in M-Commerce, Proceedings of the 2001 Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), Boston, MA.
10. Pavlou, P. (2003) Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce – Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7, 3, 69-103.
11. Sharda, R., Barr, S., and McDonnell, J. (1988) Decision Support Systems Effectiveness: A Review and an Empirical Test, Management Science, 34, 2, 139-159. 12. Sprague, R. (1980) A Framework for the Development of Decision Support Systems, MIS Quarterly, 4, 4, 1-26.
12. Todd, P. and Benbasat, I. (1992) The Use of Information in Decision Making: An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids, MIS Quarterly, 16, 3, 373-393.