Ontology of Learning Object Content Structure

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 125, Issue , 2005, Pages 322-329

  Jovanović, Jelena ^a   Gašević, Dragan ^a   Verbert, Katrien ^b   Duval, Erik ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT MODELING; CONTENT STRUCTURE; FORMAL DEFINITION; INFORMATION ARCHITECTURES; INTEGRATION POINTS; LEARNING OBJECTS; ONTOLOGY'S; STRUCTURAL ASPECTS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 85139011564     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Duval, E. and Hodgins, W., “A LOM research agenda”, In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary, 2003, pp.1-9.
2. Priestley, M., “DITA XML: A Reuse by Reference Architecture for Technical Documentation”, In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, ACM SIGDOC 2001, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, October 21-24, 2001. pp. 152-156.
3. Stojanovic, Lj., Stabb, S. and Studer, R., “eLearning based on the Semantic Web,” In Proc. of the WWWNet Conf., Orlando, USA, 2001.
4. Verbert, K. and Duval, E., “Towards a global architecture for learning objects: a comparative analysis of learning object content models,” In Proc. of the 16th ED-MEDIA 2004 Conf., Lugano, Switzerland, 2004, pp. 202-209.
5. R. E. Horn. Structured writing as a paradigm. In Instructional Development: the State of the Art. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1998.
6. DITA Language Reference. Release 1.2. First Edition, May 2003. http://xml.coverpages.org/DITALangugeReference20030606.pdf.
7. Bechhofer, S., et al (2004) “OWL Web Ontology Language Reference,” W3C Recommendation, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-owl-ref-20040210.
8. Djuriü, D, Gaševiü, D., Devedžiü, V., “Ontology Modeling and MDA,” Journal of Object Technology, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2005, pp. 109-128.
9. Buccella, A., Cechic, A. and Brisaboa, N.R. (2003). “An Ontology Approach to Data Integration,” Journal of Computer Science and Technology, Vol.3 No.2, pp. 62-68.
10. Hatala, M. and Richards, G., “Value-added Metatagging: Ontology and Rule-based Methods for Smarter Metadata,” In M. Schroeder and G. Wagner (Eds.) Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web (RuleML2003), LNCS 2876, Springer-Verlag, pp.65-80, 2003.
11. I. Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean. (2004). SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, version 0.5 of 19 November 2003. [Online]. Available:http://www.daml.org/2003/11/swrl/rules-all.html
12. Verbert, K., Jovanoviü, J., Gaševiü, D., Duval, E., and Meire, M., “Towards a Global Component Architecture for Learning Objects: a Slide Presentation Framework”, In Proc. Of the 17th ED-MEDIA 2004 Conf., Montreal, Canada, 2005. (to appear).