Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence

Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

Volumn 152, Issue , 2006, Pages 11-20

  Bex, Floris ^a   Prakken, Henry ^b   Verhey, Bart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDUCTIVE REASONING; FORMAL TECHNIQUES; GENERALISATION; LEGAL CONTEXTS; NARRATIVE THEORY;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 85139002939     PISSN: 09226389     EISSN: 18798314     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. nd edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
2. Bennett, W. L. and Feldman, M. S. (1981) Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture, Methuen-Tavistock, London etc.
3. Bex, F. J. and Prakken, H. (2004) Reinterpreting arguments in dialogue: an application to evidential reasoning. JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference, pp.119 - 129, IOS Press, Amsterdam
4. Bex, F. J., Prakken, H., Reed, C., and Walton, D. N. (2003) Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11, pp.125 - 165.
5. nd edition, Contact, Amsterdam
6. Keppens, J. and Schafer, B. (2006) Knowledge based crime scenario modelling. Expert Systems with Applications 30:pp.203 - 222.
7. Pearl, J. (1988) Embracing Causality in Default Reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 35, pp.259 - 271.
8. Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1993) The story model for juror decision making. In Hastie, R. (eds.), Inside the Juror, The Psychology of Juror Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
9. Thagard (2005): P. Thagard, Testimony, credibility and explanatory coherence. Erkenntnis 63 (2005): 295-316.
10. Tillers, P. and Schum, D. A. (1991) A Theory of Preliminary Fact Investigation. University of California Davis Law Review 24, pp.931 - 1012.
11. Toulmin, S. E. (2003) The Uses of Argument, Updated Edition edition, first published in 1958), Cambrifge University Press, Cambridge
12. Verheij, B. (2001) Anchored narratives and dialectical argumentation. ICAIL-2001 Workshop on AI and Legal Evidence.
13. Wagenaar, W. A., Van Koppen, P. J., and Crombag, H. F. M. (1993) Anchored Narratives: The Psychology of Criminal Evidence, St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY
14. Walton, D. N. (2002) Legal Argumentation and Evidence, Penn. State University Press, University Park, PA
15. nd edition), Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA